Mammalian cysteine dioxygenase (CDO) is a mononuclear non-heme iron protein that catalyzes the conversion of cysteine (Cys) to cysteine sulfinic acid by an unclarified mechanism. One structural study revealed that a Cys-persulfenate (or Cys-persulfenic acid) formed in the active site, but quantum mechanical calculations have been used to support arguments that it is not an energetically feasible reaction intermediate. Here, we report a series of high-resolution structures of CDO soaked with Cys at pH values from 4 to 9. Cys binding is minimal at pH≤5 and persulfenate formation is consistently seen at pH values between 5.5 and 7. Also, a structure determined using laboratory-based X-ray diffraction shows that the persulfenate, with an apparent average O-O separation distance of ~1.8Å, is not an artifact of synchrotron radiation. At pH≥8, the active-site iron shifts from 4- to 5-coordinate, and Cys soaks reveal a complex with Cys, but no dioxygen, bound. This 'Cys-only' complex differs in detail from a previously published 'Cys-only' complex, which we reevaluate and conclude is not reliable. The high-resolution structures presented here do not resolve the CDO mechanism but do imply that an iron-bound persulfenate (or persulfenic acid) is energetically accessible in the CDO active site, and that CDO active-site chemistry in the crystals is influenced by protonation/deprotonation events with effective pKa values near ~5.5 and ~7.5 that influence Cys binding and oxygen binding/reactivity, respectively. Furthermore, this work provides reliable ligand-bound models for guiding future mechanistic considerations.
Mammaliann class="Gene">cysteine dioxygenase (CDO) is a mononuclear non-hemeiron protein that catalyzes the conversion of cysteine (Cys) to cysteine sulfinic acid by an unclarified mechanism. One structural study revealed that a Cys-persulfenate (or Cys-persulfenic acid) formed in the active site, but quantum mechanical calculations have been used to support arguments that it is not an energetically feasible reaction intermediate. Here, we report a series of high-resolution structures of CDO soaked with Cys at pH values from 4 to 9. Cys binding is minimal at pH≤5 and persulfenate formation is consistently seen at pH values between 5.5 and 7. Also, a structure determined using laboratory-based X-ray diffraction shows that the persulfenate, with an apparent average O-O separation distance of ~1.8Å, is not an artifact of synchrotron radiation. At pH≥8, the active-site iron shifts from 4- to 5-coordinate, and Cys soaks reveal a complex with Cys, but no dioxygen, bound. This 'Cys-only' complex differs in detail from a previously published 'Cys-only' complex, which we reevaluate and conclude is not reliable. The high-resolution structures presented here do not resolve the CDO mechanism but do imply that an iron-bound persulfenate (or persulfenic acid) is energetically accessible in the CDO active site, and that CDO active-site chemistry in the crystals is influenced by protonation/deprotonation events with effective pKa values near ~5.5 and ~7.5 that influence Cys binding and oxygen binding/reactivity, respectively. Furthermore, this work provides reliable ligand-bound models for guiding future mechanistic considerations.
Authors: John E Dominy; Jesse Hwang; Stephanie Guo; Lawrence L Hirschberger; Sheng Zhang; Martha H Stipanuk Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2008-02-28 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Mariana Brait; Shizhang Ling; Jatin K Nagpal; Xiaofei Chang; Hannah Lui Park; Juna Lee; Jun Okamura; Keishi Yamashita; David Sidransky; Myoung Sook Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-09-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Egor P Tchesnokov; Matthias Fellner; Eleni Siakkou; Torsten Kleffmann; Lois W Martin; Sekotilani Aloi; Iain L Lamont; Sigurd M Wilbanks; Guy N L Jameson Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Arden Perkins; Kimberly J Nelson; Jared R Williams; Derek Parsonage; Leslie B Poole; P Andrew Karplus Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Dianna L Forbes; Kathleen M Meneely; Annemarie S Chilton; Audrey L Lamb; Holly R Ellis Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Camden M Driggers; Kelsey M Kean; Lawrence L Hirschberger; Richard B Cooley; Martha H Stipanuk; P Andrew Karplus Journal: J Mol Biol Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: William P Morrow; Sinjinee Sardar; Pawan Thapa; Mohammad S Hossain; Frank W Foss; Brad S Pierce Journal: Arch Biochem Biophys Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 4.013
Authors: Mark D White; Laura Dalle Carbonare; Mikel Lavilla Puerta; Sergio Iacopino; Martin Edwards; Kate Dunne; Elisabete Pires; Colin Levy; Michael A McDonough; Francesco Licausi; Emily Flashman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-08-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Matthias Fellner; Eleni Siakkou; Abayomi S Faponle; Egor P Tchesnokov; Sam P de Visser; Sigurd M Wilbanks; Guy N L Jameson Journal: J Biol Inorg Chem Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 3.358