Literature DB >> 19199799

Why do cysteine dioxygenase enzymes contain a 3-His ligand motif rather than a 2His/1Asp motif like most nonheme dioxygenases?

Sam P de Visser1, Grit D Straganz.   

Abstract

Density functional theory calculations on the oxygen activation process in cysteine dioxygenase (CDO) and three active site mutants whereby one histidine group is replaced by a carboxylic acid group are reported. The calculations predict an oxygen activation mechanism that starts from an Fe(III)-O-O(*) complex that has close lying singlet, triplet, and quintet spin states. A subsequent spin state crossing to the quintet spin state surfaces leads to formation of a ring-structure whereby an O-S bond is formed. This weakens the central O-O bond, which is subsequently broken to give sulfoxide and an iron-oxo complex. The second oxygen atom is transferred to the substrate after a rotation of the sulfoxide group. A series of calculations were performed on cysteine dioxygenase mutants with a 2His/1Asp motif rather than a 3His motif. These calculations focused on the differences in catalytic and electronic properties of nonheme iron systems with a 3His ligand system versus a 2His/1Asp motif, such as taurine/alpha-ketoglutarate dioxygenase (TauD), and predict why CDO has a 3His ligand system while TauD and other dioxygenases share a 2His/1Asp motif. One mutant (H86D) had the ligand trans to the dioxygen group replaced by acetate, while in another set of calculations the ligand trans to the sulfur group of cysteinate was replaced by acetate (H88D). The calculations show that the ligands influence the spin state ordering of the dioxygen bound complexes considerably and in particular stabilize the quintet spin state more so that the oxygen activation step should encounter a lower energetic cost in the mutants as compared to WT. Despite this, the mutant structures require higher O-O bond breaking energies. Moreover, the mutants create more stable iron-oxo complexes than the WT, but the second oxygen atom transfer to the substrate is accomplished with much higher reaction barriers than the WT system. In particular, a ligand trans to the sulfur atom of cysteine that pushes electrons to the iron will weaken the Fe-S bond and lead to dissociation of this bond in an earlier step in the catalytic cycle than the WT structure. On the other hand, replacement of the ligand trans to the dioxygen moiety has minor effects on cysteinate binding but enhances the barriers for the second oxygen transfer process. These studies have given insight into why cysteine dioxygenase enzymes contain a 3His ligand motif rather than 2His/1Asp and show that the ligand system is essential for optimal dioxygenation activity of the substrate. In particular, CDO mutants with a 2His/1Asp motif may give sulfoxides as byproduct due to incomplete dioxygenation processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19199799     DOI: 10.1021/jp809700f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem A        ISSN: 1089-5639            Impact factor:   2.781


  18 in total

1.  The "Gln-Type" Thiol Dioxygenase from Azotobacter vinelandii is a 3-Mercaptopropionic Acid Dioxygenase.

Authors:  Brad S Pierce; Bishnu P Subedi; Sinjinee Sardar; Joshua K Crowell
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Sulfur oxygenation in biomimetic non-heme iron-thiolate complexes.

Authors:  Alison C McQuilken; David P Goldberg
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.390

3.  O2 activation by bis(imino)pyridine iron(II)-thiolate complexes.

Authors:  Yosra M Badiei; Maxime A Siegler; David P Goldberg
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Structure-Based Insights into the Role of the Cys-Tyr Crosslink and Inhibitor Recognition by Mammalian Cysteine Dioxygenase.

Authors:  Camden M Driggers; Kelsey M Kean; Lawrence L Hirschberger; Richard B Cooley; Martha H Stipanuk; P Andrew Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Cysteine dioxygenase structures from pH4 to 9: consistent cys-persulfenate formation at intermediate pH and a Cys-bound enzyme at higher pH.

Authors:  Camden M Driggers; Richard B Cooley; Banumathi Sankaran; Lawrence L Hirschberger; Martha H Stipanuk; P Andrew Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Axial and equatorial ligand effects on biomimetic cysteine dioxygenase model complexes.

Authors:  Luis E Gonzalez-Ovalle; Matthew G Quesne; Devesh Kumar; David P Goldberg; Sam P de Visser
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 7.  Go it alone: four-electron oxidations by mononuclear non-heme iron enzymes.

Authors:  Spencer C Peck; Wilfred A van der Donk
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.358

8.  Synthesis, X-ray Structures, Electronic Properties, and O2/NO Reactivities of Thiol Dioxygenase Active-Site Models.

Authors:  Anne A Fischer; Nuru Stracey; Sergey V Lindeman; Thomas C Brunold; Adam T Fiedler
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 5.165

9.  Structures of Arabidopsis thaliana oxygen-sensing plant cysteine oxidases 4 and 5 enable targeted manipulation of their activity.

Authors:  Mark D White; Laura Dalle Carbonare; Mikel Lavilla Puerta; Sergio Iacopino; Martin Edwards; Kate Dunne; Elisabete Pires; Colin Levy; Michael A McDonough; Francesco Licausi; Emily Flashman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Structures, Spectroscopic Properties, and Dioxygen Reactivity of 5- and 6-Coordinate Nonheme Iron(II) Complexes: A Combined Enzyme/Model Study of Thiol Dioxygenases.

Authors:  Jesse B Gordon; Jeremy P McGale; Joshua R Prendergast; Zahra Shirani-Sarmazeh; Maxime A Siegler; Guy N L Jameson; David P Goldberg
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.