Literature DB >> 23747611

Effects of stimulus salience on touchscreen serial reversal learning in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome.

Price E Dickson1, Beau Corkill, Eric McKimm, Mellessa M Miller, Michele A Calton, Daniel Goldowitz, Charles D Blaha, Guy Mittleman.   

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common inherited form of intellectual disability in males and the most common genetic cause of autism. Although executive dysfunction is consistently found in humans with FXS, evidence of executive dysfunction in Fmr1 KO mice, a mouse model of FXS, has been inconsistent. One possible explanation for this is that executive dysfunction in Fmr1 KO mice, similar to humans with FXS, is only evident when cognitive demands are high. Using touchscreen operant conditioning chambers, male Fmr1 KO mice and their male wildtype littermates were tested on the acquisition of a pairwise visual discrimination followed by four serial reversals of the response rule. We assessed reversal learning performance under two different conditions. In the first, the correct stimulus was salient and the incorrect stimulus was non-salient. In the second and more challenging condition, the incorrect stimulus was salient and the correct stimulus was non-salient; this increased cognitive load by introducing conflict between sensory-driven (i.e., bottom-up) and task-dependent (i.e., top-down) signals. Fmr1 KOs displayed two distinct impairments relative to wildtype littermates. First, Fmr1 KOs committed significantly more learning-type errors during the second reversal stage, but only under high cognitive load. Second, during the first reversal stage, Fmr1 KOs committed significantly more attempts to collect a reward during the timeout following an incorrect response. These findings indicate that Fmr1 KO mice display executive dysfunction that, in some cases, is only evident under high cognitive load.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral flexibility; Executive function; Fmr1; Fragile X syndrome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23747611      PMCID: PMC3854797          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.05.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  64 in total

1.  Effects of selective thalamic and prelimbic cortex lesions on two types of visual discrimination and reversal learning.

Authors:  Y Chudasama; T J Bussey; J L Muir
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Mildly impaired water maze performance in male Fmr1 knockout mice.

Authors:  R D'Hooge; G Nagels; F Franck; C E Bakker; E Reyniers; K Storm; R F Kooy; B A Oostra; P J Willems; P P De Deyn
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Fragile X mice develop sensory hyperreactivity to auditory stimuli.

Authors:  L Chen; M Toth
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Brain anatomy, gender and IQ in children and adolescents with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  S Eliez; C M Blasey; L S Freund; T Hastie; A L Reiss
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Anatomical phenotyping in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jacob Ellegood; Laura K Pacey; David R Hampson; Jason P Lerch; R Mark Henkelman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Further delineation of the executive deficit in males with fragile-X syndrome.

Authors:  John Wilding; Kim Cornish; Fehmidah Munir
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 7.  Gene, brain, and behavior relationships in fragile X syndrome: evidence from neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Amy A Lightbody; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2009

8.  FMR1 protein: conserved RNP family domains and selective RNA binding.

Authors:  C T Ashley; K D Wilkinson; D Reines; S T Warren
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Neural circuits subserving behavioral flexibility and their relevance to schizophrenia.

Authors:  Stan B Floresco; Ying Zhang; Takeshi Enomoto
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Genetic and dopaminergic modulation of reversal learning in a touchscreen-based operant procedure for mice.

Authors:  Alicia Izquierdo; Lisa M Wiedholz; Rachel A Millstein; Rebecca J Yang; Timothy J Bussey; Lisa M Saksida; Andrew Holmes
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  12 in total

1.  Role for the M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor in Top-Down Cognitive Processing Using a Touchscreen Visual Discrimination Task in Mice.

Authors:  R W Gould; D Dencker; M Grannan; M Bubser; X Zhan; J Wess; Z Xiang; C Locuson; C W Lindsley; P J Conn; C K Jones
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.418

2.  Cerebellar contribution to higher and lower order rule learning and cognitive flexibility in mice.

Authors:  P E Dickson; J Cairns; D Goldowitz; G Mittleman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Putative Microcircuit-Level Substrates for Attention Are Disrupted in Mouse Models of Autism.

Authors:  Francisco J Luongo; Meryl E Horn; Vikaas S Sohal
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Performance of C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice on a touchscreen-based attentional set-shifting task.

Authors:  Price E Dickson; Michele A Calton; Guy Mittleman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Hyperactivity, perseveration and increased responding during attentional rule acquisition in the Fragile X mouse model.

Authors:  Ioannis Kramvis; Huibert D Mansvelder; Maarten Loos; Rhiannon Meredith
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  BALB/c Mice Can Learn Touchscreen Visual Discrimination and Reversal Tasks Faster than C57BL/6 Mice.

Authors:  Karly M Turner; Christopher G Simpson; Thomas H J Burne
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  The Virtual-Environment-Foraging Task enables rapid training and single-trial metrics of rule acquisition and reversal in head-fixed mice.

Authors:  Martha N Havenith; Peter M Zijderveld; Sabrina van Heukelum; Shaghayegh Abghari; Paul Tiesinga; Jeffrey C Glennon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Impaired activity-dependent neural circuit assembly and refinement in autism spectrum disorder genetic models.

Authors:  Caleb A Doll; Kendal Broadie
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.505

9.  Normal Performance of Fmr1 Mice on a Touchscreen Delayed Nonmatching to Position Working Memory Task.

Authors:  Prescott T Leach; Jane Hayes; Michael Pride; Jill L Silverman; Jacqueline N Crawley
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-03-15

10.  Cyfip1 haploinsufficient rats show white matter changes, myelin thinning, abnormal oligodendrocytes and behavioural inflexibility.

Authors:  Ana I Silva; Josephine E Haddon; Yasir Ahmed Syed; Simon Trent; Tzu-Ching E Lin; Yateen Patel; Jenny Carter; Niels Haan; Robert C Honey; Trevor Humby; Yaniv Assaf; Michael J Owen; David E J Linden; Jeremy Hall; Lawrence S Wilkinson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.