Literature DB >> 23746012

One-year mortality after isolated pelvic fractures with posterior ring involvement in elderly patients.

Jesse E Bible1, Rishin J Kadakia, Adam Wegner, Justin E Richards, Hassan R Mir.   

Abstract

Previous 1-year mortality studies of pelvic fractures in elderly patients have focused on pubic rami fractures, in elderly patients with multiple injuries, or both. Baseline information on the 1-year mortality of isolated pelvic fractures in elderly patients is unavailable. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 1-year mortality of elderly patients (aged 60 years or older) after isolated pelvic fractures with posterior ring involvement (Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 61-B and C). All patients aged 60 years or older treated for pelvic injuries at a single Level I trauma center over a 12-year period were retrospectively reviewed (N=1223). Exclusion criteria were associated injuries to other body systems (Abbreviated Injury Scale greater than 2), ballistic injuries, long bone fractures, concurrent acetabular fractures, and type 61-A fractures or isolated pubic rami fractures without posterior involvement. Mortality data were obtained from the Social Security Death Index. Seventy patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients treated nonoperatively were significantly older compared with those treated operatively. However, the Charlson Comorbidity Index did not significantly differ between treatment groups. A significantly higher percentage of type-B fractures (83.0%) were treated nonoperatively compared with type-C fractures, which were treated operatively 88.2% of the time. Mortality rates at 3 and 6 months and 1 year postoperatively were 7.1%, 11.4%, and 12.9%, respectively. These results suggest that the 1-year mortality rates of isolated pelvic fractures in elderly patients are lower than those reported previously for hip fractures and pelvic fractures with concurrent injuries. Although age was identified as a significant variable differing between patients treated operatively vs nonoperatively, comorbidities were not. Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23746012     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20130523-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  10 in total

1.  Implementation of a standardized protocol to manage elderly patients with low energy pelvic fractures: can service improvement be expected?

Authors:  Nikolaos K Kanakaris; Tess Greven; Robert M West; Arie B Van Vugt; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Morbidity and mortality following pelvic ramus fractures in an older Atlantic Canadian cohort

Authors:  Chris B. Hamilton; John D. Harnett; N. Craig Stone; Andrew J. Furey
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Low-energy lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring fractures in the middle-aged and elderly affect hospital quality measures and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Nina D Fisher; Sara J Solasz; Assefa Tensae; Sanjit R Konda; Kenneth A Egol
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-09-20

4.  Focusing on individual morphological fracture characteristics of pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients can support clinical decision making.

Authors:  Franziska Saxer; Henrik Eckardt; Michaela Ramser; Dieter Cadosch; Werner Vach; Nathalie Strub
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.070

5.  Water extract of Cnidii Rhizoma suppresses RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis in RAW 264.7 cell by inhibiting NFATc1/c-Fos signaling and prevents ovariectomized bone loss in SD-rat.

Authors:  Ka-Yeon Lee; Jae-Hyun Kim; Eun-Young Kim; Mijung Yeom; Hyuk-Sang Jung; Youngjoo Sohn
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.659

6.  Pelvic ring injury in the elderly: Fragile patients with substantial mortality rates and long-term physical impairment.

Authors:  Hester Banierink; Kaj Ten Duis; Rob de Vries; Klaus Wendt; Erik Heineman; Inge Reininga; Frank IJpma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Care Conundrum.

Authors:  Bailey R Abernathy; Lisa K Schroder; Deborah C Bohn; Julie A Switzer
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-14

8.  Pelvic fractures in severely injured elderly: a double-adjustment propensity score matched analysis from a level I trauma center.

Authors:  Shekhar Gogna; Rifat Latifi; David J Samson; Jonathan Butler
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  The impact of specific fracture characteristics of low-energy fractures of the pelvis on mortality.

Authors:  Franziska Saxer; Henrik Eckardt; Michaela Ramser; Werner Vach; Nathalie Strub; Dieter Cadosch
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 4.070

10.  Refracture and mortality following hospitalization for severe osteoporotic fractures: The Fractos Study.

Authors:  Christian Roux; Thierry Thomas; Julien Paccou; Geoffray Bizouard; Anne Crochard; Emese Toth; Magali Lemaitre; Frédérique Maurel; Laure Perrin; Florence Tubach
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2021-05-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.