Literature DB >> 23745576

Conformational differences between the methoxy groups of QA and QB site ubisemiquinones in bacterial reaction centers: a key role for methoxy group orientation in modulating ubiquinone redox potential.

Alexander T Taguchi1, Patrick J O'Malley, Colin A Wraight, Sergei A Dikanov.   

Abstract

Ubiquinone is an almost universal, membrane-associated redox mediator. Its ability to accept either one or two electrons allows it to function in critical roles in biological electron transport. The redox properties of ubiquinone in vivo are determined by its environment in the binding sites of proteins and by the dihedral angle of each methoxy group relative to the ring plane. This is an attribute unique to ubiquinone among natural quinones and could account for its widespread function with many different redox complexes. In this work, we use the photosynthetic reaction center as a model system for understanding the role of methoxy conformations in determining the redox potential of the ubiquinone/semiquinone couple. Despite the abundance of X-ray crystal structures for the reaction center, quinone site resolution has thus far been too low to provide a reliable measure of the methoxy dihedral angles of the primary and secondary quinones, QA and QB. We performed 2D ESEEM (HYSCORE) on isolated reaction centers with ubiquinones (13)C-labeled at the headgroup methyl and methoxy substituents, and have measured the (13)C isotropic and anisotropic components of the hyperfine tensors. Hyperfine couplings were compared to those derived by DFT calculations as a function of methoxy torsional angle allowing estimation of the methoxy dihedral angles for the semiquinones in the QA and QB sites. Based on this analysis, the orientation of the 2-methoxy groups are distinct in the two sites, with QB more out of plane by 20-25°. This corresponds to an ≈50 meV larger electron affinity for the QB quinone, indicating a substantial contribution to the experimental difference in redox potentials (60-75 mV) of the two quinones. The methods developed here can be readily extended to ubiquinone-binding sites in other protein complexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23745576      PMCID: PMC3800232          DOI: 10.1021/bi400489b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  23 in total

1.  Intensity of cross-peaks in hyscore spectra of S = 1/2, I = 1/2 spin systems.

Authors:  S A Dikanov; A M Tyryshkin; M K Bowman
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 2.  Proton and electron transfer in the acceptor quinone complex of photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  Colin A Wraight
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2004-01-01

3.  Coenzyme Q: a molecular orbital study.

Authors:  D L Breen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  An electron nuclear double resonance and electron spin resonance study of semiquinones related to vitamins K and E-1a.

Authors:  M R Das; H D Connor; D S Leniart; J H Freed
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1970-04-22       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Primary acceptor in bacterial photosynthesis: obligatory role of ubiquinone in photoactive reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas spheroides.

Authors:  M Y Okamura; R A Isaacson; G Feher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Hydrogen bonding between the Q(B) site ubisemiquinone and Ser-L223 in the bacterial reaction center: a combined spectroscopic and computational perspective.

Authors:  Erik Martin; Amgalanbaatar Baldansuren; Tzu-Jen Lin; Rimma I Samoilova; Colin A Wraight; Sergei A Dikanov; Patrick J O'Malley
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  The involvement of iron and ubiquinone in electron transfer reactions mediated by reaction centers from photosynthetic bacteria.

Authors:  R E Blankenship; W W Parson
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1979-03-15

8.  Does different orientation of the methoxy groups of ubiquinone-10 in the reaction centre of Rhodobacter sphaeroides cause different binding at QA and QB?

Authors:  André Remy; Rutger B Boers; Tatiana Egorova-Zachernyuk; Peter Gast; Johan Lugtenburg; Klaus Gerwert
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  2003-09

9.  Electron acceptors of bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers. II. H+ binding coupled to secondary electron transfer in the quinone acceptor complex.

Authors:  C A Wraight
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1979-11-08

10.  Electron transfer in reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. I. Determination of the charge recombination pathway of D+QAQ(-)B and free energy and kinetic relations between Q(-)AQB and QAQ(-)B.

Authors:  D Kleinfeld; M Y Okamura; G Feher
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1984-07-27
View more
  5 in total

1.  Colin A. Wraight, 1945-2014.

Authors:  Roger C Prince; Donald R Ort
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Tuning cofactor redox potentials: the 2-methoxy dihedral angle generates a redox potential difference of >160 mV between the primary (Q(A)) and secondary (Q(B)) quinones of the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center.

Authors:  Alexander T Taguchi; Aidas J Mattis; Patrick J O'Malley; Sergei A Dikanov; Colin A Wraight
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Redox potential tuning through differential quinone binding in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  Josh V Vermaas; Alexander T Taguchi; Sergei A Dikanov; Colin A Wraight; Emad Tajkhorshid
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  The semiquinone at the Qi site of the bc1 complex explored using HYSCORE spectroscopy and specific isotopic labeling of ubiquinone in Rhodobacter sphaeroides via (13)C methionine and construction of a methionine auxotroph.

Authors:  Sangjin Hong; Wagner B de Almeida; Alexander T Taguchi; Rimma I Samoilova; Robert B Gennis; Patrick J O'Malley; Sergei A Dikanov; Antony R Crofts
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  The 2-Methoxy Group Orientation Regulates the Redox Potential Difference between the Primary (QA) and Secondary (QB) Quinones of Type II Bacterial Photosynthetic Reaction Centers.

Authors:  Wagner B de Almeida; Alexander T Taguchi; Sergei A Dikanov; Colin A Wraight; Patrick J O'Malley
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 6.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.