Does different orientation of the methoxy groups of ubiquinone-10 in the reaction centre of Rhodobacter sphaeroides cause different binding at QA and QB?

The different roles of ubiquinone-10 (UQ10) at the primary and secondary quinone (QA and QB) binding sites of Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 reaction centres are governed by the protein microenvironment. The 4C=O carbonyl group of QA is unusually strongly hydrogen-bonded, in contrast to QB. This asymmetric binding seems to determine their different functions. The asymmetric hydrogen-bonding at QA can be caused intrinsically by distortion of the methoxy groups or extrinsically by binding to specific amino-acid side groups. Different X-ray-based structural models show contradictory orientations of the methoxy groups and do not provide a clear picture. To elucidate if distortion of the methoxy groups induces this hydrogen-bonding, their (ring-)C-O vibrations were assigned by use of site-specifically labelled [5-13C]UQ10 and [6-13C]UQ10 reconstituted at either the QA or the QB binding site. Two infrared bands at 1288 cm(-1) and 1264 cm(-1) were assigned to the methoxy vibrations. They did not shift in frequency at either the QA or QB binding sites, as compared with unbound UQ10. As the frequencies of these vibrations and their coupling are sensitive to the conformations of the methoxy groups, different conformations of the C(5) and C(6) methoxy groups at the QA and QB binding sites can now be excluded. Both methoxy groups are oriented out of plane at QA and QB. Therefore, hydrogen-bonding to His M219 combined with electrostatic interactions with the Fe2+ ion seems to determine the strong asymmetric binding of QA.