Literature DB >> 23744690

Improved T2* imaging without increase in scan time: SWI processing of 2D gradient echo.

S Soman1, S J Holdsworth, P D Barnes, J Rosenberg, J B Andre, R Bammer, K W Yeom.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: 2D gradient-echo imaging is sensitive to T2* lesions (hemorrhages, mineralization, and vascular lesions), and susceptibility-weighted imaging is even more sensitive, but at the cost of additional scan time (SWI: 5-10 minutes; 2D gradient-echo: 2 minutes). The long acquisition time of SWI may pose challenges in motion-prone patients. We hypothesized that 2D SWI/phase unwrapped images processed from 2D gradient-echo imaging could improve T2* lesion detection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 2D gradient-echo brain images of 50 consecutive pediatric patients (mean age, 8 years) acquired at 3T were retrospectively processed to generate 2D SWI/phase unwrapped images. The 2D gradient-echo and 2D SWI/phase unwrapped images were compared for various imaging parameters and were scored in a blinded fashion.
RESULTS: Of 50 patients, 2D gradient-echo imaging detected T2* lesions in 29 patients and had normal findings in 21 patients. 2D SWI was more sensitive than standard 2D gradient-echo imaging in detecting T2* lesions (P < .0001). 2D SWI/phase unwrapped imaging also improved delineation of normal venous structures and nonpathologic calcifications and helped distinguish calcifications from hemorrhage. A few pitfalls of 2D SWI/phase unwrapped imaging were noted, including worsened motion and dental artifacts and challenges in detecting T2* lesions adjacent to calvaria or robust deoxygenated veins.
CONCLUSIONS: 2D SWI and associated phase unwrapped images processed from standard 2D gradient-echo images were more sensitive in detecting T2* lesions and delineating normal venous structures and nonpathologic mineralization, and they also helped distinguish calcification at no additional scan time. SWI processing of 2D gradient-echo images may be a useful adjunct in cases in which longer scan times of 3D SWI are difficult to implement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23744690      PMCID: PMC7964849          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  18 in total

1.  Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI).

Authors:  E Mark Haacke; Yingbiao Xu; Yu-Chung N Cheng; Jürgen R Reichenbach
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Clinical applications of neuroimaging with susceptibility-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Vivek Sehgal; Zachary Delproposto; E Mark Haacke; Karen A Tong; Nathaniel Wycliffe; Daniel K Kido; Yingbiao Xu; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Djamel Haddar; Jürgen R Reichenbach
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging of the brain: current utility and potential applications.

Authors:  Richard J Robinson; Sandeep Bhuta
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Small vessels in the human brain: MR venography with deoxyhemoglobin as an intrinsic contrast agent.

Authors:  J R Reichenbach; R Venkatesan; D J Schillinger; D K Kido; E M Haacke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Imaging and clinical characteristics of children with multiple foci of microsusceptibility changes in the brain on susceptibility-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Tetsu Niwa; Noriko Aida; Taro Takahara; Thomas C Kwee; Kazutoshi Fujita; Ayako Shishikura; Daiki Miyata; Tomio Inoue
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-04-28

Review 6.  Susceptibility weighted imaging: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Benjamin C Ong; Stephen L Stuckey
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.735

7.  Hemorrhagic shearing lesions in children and adolescents with posttraumatic diffuse axonal injury: improved detection and initial results.

Authors:  Karen A Tong; Stephen Ashwal; Barbara A Holshouser; Lori A Shutter; Gwenael Herigault; E Mark Haacke; Daniel K Kido
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Identification of calcification with MRI using susceptibility-weighted imaging: a case study.

Authors:  Zhen Wu; Sandeep Mittal; Karl Kish; Yingjian Yu; J Hu; E Mark Haacke
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Susceptibility-weighted MR imaging: a review of clinical applications in children.

Authors:  K A Tong; S Ashwal; A Obenaus; J P Nickerson; D Kido; E M Haacke
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications, part 2.

Authors:  S Mittal; Z Wu; J Neelavalli; E M Haacke
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  9 in total

1.  Use of magnetic resonance imaging in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury: assessment of current practice.

Authors:  Peter A Ferrazzano; Bedda L Rosario; Stephen R Wisniewski; Nadeem I Shafi; Heather M Siefkes; Darryl K Miles; Andrew L Alexander; Michael J Bell
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Susceptibility-Based Neuroimaging: Standard Methods, Clinical Applications, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Salil Soman; Jose A Bregni; Berkin Bilgic; Ursula Nemec; Audrey Fan; Zhe Liu; Robert L Barry; Jiang Du; Keith Main; Jerome Yesavage; Maheen M Adamson; Michael Moseley; Yi Wang
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2017-02-14

3.  Iron and Non-Iron-Related Characteristics of Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Lesions at 7T MRI.

Authors:  S Chawla; I Kister; J Wuerfel; J-C Brisset; S Liu; T Sinnecker; P Dusek; E M Haacke; F Paul; Y Ge
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Accuracy of SWI sequences compared to T2*-weighted gradient echo sequences in the detection of cerebral cavernous malformations in the familial form.

Authors:  Gianvincenzo Sparacia; Claudia Speciale; Aurelia Banco; Francesco Bencivinni; Massimo Midiri
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2016-08-22

5.  Brain Injury Lesion Imaging Using Preconditioned Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping without Skull Stripping.

Authors:  S Soman; Z Liu; G Kim; U Nemec; S J Holdsworth; K Main; B Lee; S Kolakowsky-Hayner; M Selim; A J Furst; P Massaband; J Yesavage; M M Adamson; P Spincemaille; M Moseley; Y Wang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Contrast-enhanced FLAIR (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) for evaluating mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Soo Chin Kim; Sun-Won Park; Inseon Ryoo; Seung Chai Jung; Tae Jin Yun; Seung Hong Choi; Ji-hoon Kim; Chul-Ho Sohn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Diagnostic value of alternative techniques to gadolinium-based contrast agents in MR neuroimaging-a comprehensive overview.

Authors:  Anna Falk Delgado; Danielle Van Westen; Markus Nilsson; Linda Knutsson; Pia C Sundgren; Elna-Marie Larsson; Alberto Falk Delgado
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-08-23

8.  Clinical significance of asymmetric venous vasculature on minimum-intensity projection in patients with moyamoya disease.

Authors:  Min Jeong Han; Sun Jun Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  T2* "susceptibility vessel sign" demonstrates clot location and length in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Olivier Naggara; Jean Raymond; Montserrat Domingo Ayllon; Fawaz Al-Shareef; Emmanuel Touzé; Meriem Chenoufi; Sophie Gerber; Charles Mellerio; Matthieu Zuber; Jean Francois Meder; Jean-Louis Mas; Catherine Oppenheim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.