Literature DB >> 23744626

First-trimester contingent screening for trisomy 21 by biomarkers and maternal blood cell-free DNA testing.

K H Nicolaides1, D Wright, L C Poon, A Syngelaki, M M Gil.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define risk cut-offs with corresponding detection rates (DR) and false-positive rates (FPR) in screening for trisomy 21 using maternal age and combinations of first-trimester biomarkers in order to determine which women should undergo contingent maternal blood cell-free (cf) DNA testing.
METHODS: From singleton pregnancies undergoing screening for aneuploidies at three UK hospitals between March 2006 and May 2012, we analyzed prospectively collected data on the following biomarkers: fetal nuchal translucency thickness (NT) and ductus venosus pulsatility index for veins (DV-PIV) at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation and serum free β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), placental growth factor (PlGF) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) at 8 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks. Estimates of risk cut-offs, DRs and FPRs were derived for combinations of biomarkers and these were used to define the best strategy for contingent cfDNA testing.
RESULTS: In contingent screening, detection of 98% of fetuses with trisomy 21 at an overall invasive testing rate < 0.5% can be potentially achieved by offering cfDNA testing to about 36%, 21% and 11% of cases identified by first-line screening using the combined test alone, using the combined test with the addition of serum PlGF and AFP and using the combined test with the addition of PlGF, AFP and DV-PIV, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Effective first-trimester screening for trisomy 21, with DR of 98% and invasive testing rate < 0.5%, can be potentially achieved by contingent screening incorporating biomarkers and cfDNA testing.
Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23744626     DOI: 10.1002/uog.12511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  17 in total

1.  Genetic Counselors' Perspectives About Cell-Free DNA: Experiences, Challenges, and Expectations for Obstetricians.

Authors:  Patricia K Agatisa; Mary Beth Mercer; Marissa Coleridge; Ruth M Farrell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  The Integration of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening into the Existing Prenatal Paradigm: a Survey of Current Genetic Counseling Practice.

Authors:  Emily Suskin; Laura Hercher; Kathleen Erskine Aaron; Komal Bajaj
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Six consecutive false positive cases from cell-free fetal DNA testing in a single referring centre.

Authors:  Nella Dugo; Francesco Padula; Luisa Mobili; Cristiana Brizzi; Laura D'Emidio; Pietro Cignini; Alvaro Mesoraca; Domenico Bizzoco; Antonella Cima; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar

Review 4.  Integration of noninvasive DNA testing for aneuploidy into prenatal care: what has happened since the rubber met the road?

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi; Louise Wilkins-Haug
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 5.  Diagnostic Methods of Ectopic Pregnancy and Early Pregnancy Loss: a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  A Hamza; G Meyberg-Solomayer; I Juhasz-Böss; R Joukhadar; Z Takacs; E-F Solomayer; S Baum; J Radosa; L Mavrova; D Herr
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  The utilization of circulating cell-free fetal DNA testing and decrease in invasive diagnostic procedures: an institutional experience.

Authors:  K E Pettit; A D Hull; L Korty; M C Jones; D H Pretorius
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Incorporation of dried blood alpha fetoprotein into traditional first trimester Down syndrome screening service.

Authors:  Jonathan Carmichael; David Krantz; Hsiao-Pin Liu; David Janik; Terrence Hallahan
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  A novel Alu-based real-time PCR method for the quantitative detection of plasma circulating cell-free DNA: sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Xiaoli Lou; Yanqiang Hou; Dongyu Liang; Liang Peng; Hongwei Chen; Shanyuan Ma; Lurong Zhang
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 4.101

Review 9.  Exploring preterm birth as a polymicrobial disease: an overview of the uterine microbiome.

Authors:  Matthew S Payne; Sara Bayatibojakhi
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 10.  Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Using Cell Free DNA in Maternal Plasma: Recent Developments and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Peter Benn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.