Literature DB >> 23743612

Changes in frailty-related characteristics of the hip fracture population and their implications for healthcare services: evidence from Quebec, Canada.

M Auais1, S Morin, L Nadeau, L Finch, N Mayo.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: This study provides evidence that a number of frailty-related characteristics (older age, de novo admission to long-term care (LTC), comorbidities [Charlson Index, osteoporosis, osteoporosis risk factors, sarcopenia risk factors, and dementia]) have increased in the hip fracture population from 2001-2008. This will have significant impact on community resources, as the number of people discharged to the community is also increasing.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to estimate secular changes in the prevalence of selected frailty-related characteristics among the hip fracture population in the Canadian province of Quebec (2001-2008) and the potential impact of these changes on healthcare services.
METHODS: The Quebec hospitalization database was used to identify nontraumatic hip fractures for the purposes of calculating age- and sex-specific rates. Also estimated were time trends for selected frailty-related characteristics and discharge destinations.
RESULTS: A significant decline in fracture rates was evident for all age groups except for those <65; sex differences were also observed. Almost all frailty-related characteristics increased over time, ranging from 2 to 14 % per year, which translates to an estimated increase from 16 to 112 %, over the study period. For those whose prior living arrangement was LTC, rates of hip fractures declined significantly (women OR = 0.93, 0.91-0.95; men OR = 0.97, 0.94-0.99). In-hospital mortality and discharge to inpatient rehabilitation decreased, while discharges back to community and to LTC increased.
CONCLUSIONS: Although hip fracture rates decreased for older hip fracture patients, the absolute number and prevalence of specific frailty-related characteristics increased. Policy makers should review care models to ensure that adequate resources are provided to the community to offset the expected increase in demand arising from ongoing changes in patients' characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23743612     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-013-2390-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  56 in total

Review 1.  Models of accelerated sarcopenia: critical pieces for solving the puzzle of age-related muscle atrophy.

Authors:  Thomas W Buford; Stephen D Anton; Andrew R Judge; Emanuele Marzetti; Stephanie E Wohlgemuth; Christy S Carter; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Marco Pahor; Todd M Manini
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 10.895

2.  Institutionalization following incident non-traumatic fractures in community-dwelling men and women.

Authors:  S Morin; L M Lix; M Azimaee; C Metge; S R Majumdar; W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Frailty in older adults: insights and interventions.

Authors:  Sara Espinoza; Jeremy D Walston
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.321

4.  Trends in hospital care for hip fractures.

Authors:  S H Gehlbach; J S Avrunin; E Puleo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Diseases affecting bone quality: beyond osteoporosis.

Authors:  Aasis Unnanuntana; Brian J Rebolledo; M Michael Khair; Edward F DiCarlo; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Incidence of hip fracture in New South Wales: are our efforts having an effect?

Authors:  Soufiane Boufous; Caroline F Finch; Stephen R Lord
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Changes in population demographics and the future incidence of hip fracture.

Authors:  G Holt; R Smith; K Duncan; J D Hutchison; D Reid
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Trends in the pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis in Spain from 2000 to 2008.

Authors:  M Esther Salgueiro; Gloria Manso; Xavier Castells; Francisco J Jimeno; Lucía Ordoñez; Verónica González; Alfonso Rodríguez; Dolors Capellà
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Dementia and hip fractures: development of a pathogenic framework for understanding and studying risk.

Authors:  Susan M Friedman; Isaura B Menzies; Susan V Bukata; Daniel A Mendelson; Stephen L Kates
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2010-11

10.  Frailty, fitness and late-life mortality in relation to chronological and biological age.

Authors:  Arnold B Mitnitski; Janice E Graham; Alexander J Mogilner; Kenneth Rockwood
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2002-02-27       Impact factor: 3.921

View more
  23 in total

1.  Discharge destination following hip fracture in Canada among previously community-dwelling older adults, 2004-2012: database study.

Authors:  L Beaupre; B Sobolev; P Guy; J D Kim; L Kuramoto; K J Sheehan; J M Sutherland; E Harvey; S N Morin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  In-hospital mortality after hip fracture by treatment setting.

Authors:  Katie J Sheehan; Boris Sobolev; Pierre Guy; Lisa Kuramoto; Suzanne N Morin; Jason M Sutherland; Lauren Beaupre; Donald Griesdale; Michael Dunbar; Eric Bohm; Edward Harvey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Geriatric Cardiology: An Emerging Discipline.

Authors:  John A Dodson; Daniel D Matlock; Daniel E Forman
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 4.  Temporal trends in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  S N Morin; L M Lix; S R Majumdar; W D Leslie
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Regional variability in changes in the incidence of hip fracture in the Spanish population (2000-2012).

Authors:  I Etxebarria-Foronda; A Arrospide; M Soto-Gordoa; J R Caeiro; L C Abecia; J Mar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  The role of sarcopenia in the risk of osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  A Oliveira; C Vaz
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Improved 1-year mortality in elderly patients with a hip fracture following integrated orthogeriatric treatment.

Authors:  E C Folbert; J H Hegeman; M Vermeer; E M Regtuijt; D van der Velde; H J Ten Duis; J P Slaets
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Who benefits from orthogeriatric treatment? Results from the Trondheim hip-fracture trial.

Authors:  Anders Prestmo; Ingvild Saltvedt; Jorunn L Helbostad; Kristin Taraldsen; Pernille Thingstad; Stian Lydersen; Olav Sletvold
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  Handgrip strength is an independent predictor of functional outcome in hip-fracture women: a prospective study with 6-month follow-up.

Authors:  Marco Di Monaco; Carlotta Castiglioni; Elena De Toma; Luisa Gardin; Silvia Giordano; Rosa Tappero
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 10.  Patient and system factors of mortality after hip fracture: a scoping review.

Authors:  K J Sheehan; B Sobolev; A Chudyk; T Stephens; P Guy
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.