BACKGROUND: Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction (EF) is a recently described clinical entity. There is insufficient information on the management of implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients with improved EF at generator replacement. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the incidence of appropriate shocks in 91 consecutive patients with ICDs for primary prevention of sudden death who underwent generator replacement. Improved EF was defined as both EF >35% at generator replacement and increase in EF by ≥10% since original implantation. Patients were 70 ± 11 years old, and 76% had ischemic cardiomyopathy. At generator replacement, 25 patients (27%) had improved EF (0.49 ± 0.08 vs 0.31 ± 0.07 at baseline; P < .0001). Over 6.2 ± 2.2 years of follow-up after original implantation, 9 patients (36%) with improved EF versus 19 (29%) with unchanged EF had appropriate ICD shocks (P = .51). Incidence of appropriate ICD shocks was similar between the two groups before (P = .90) and after (P = .97) generator replacement. Of the 9 improved EF patients with appropriate shock, 4 had shocks before generator replacement, 2 had shocks before and after generator replacement, and 3 patients, who never had shocks before, had their first shock after generator replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Some ICD patients whose EF improves to >35% at generator replacement remain at risk for appropriate ICD shocks. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND:Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction (EF) is a recently described clinical entity. There is insufficient information on the management of implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients with improved EF at generator replacement. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the incidence of appropriate shocks in 91 consecutive patients with ICDs for primary prevention of sudden death who underwent generator replacement. Improved EF was defined as both EF >35% at generator replacement and increase in EF by ≥10% since original implantation. Patients were 70 ± 11 years old, and 76% had ischemic cardiomyopathy. At generator replacement, 25 patients (27%) had improved EF (0.49 ± 0.08 vs 0.31 ± 0.07 at baseline; P < .0001). Over 6.2 ± 2.2 years of follow-up after original implantation, 9 patients (36%) with improved EF versus 19 (29%) with unchanged EF had appropriate ICD shocks (P = .51). Incidence of appropriate ICD shocks was similar between the two groups before (P = .90) and after (P = .97) generator replacement. Of the 9 improved EF patients with appropriate shock, 4 had shocks before generator replacement, 2 had shocks before and after generator replacement, and 3 patients, who never had shocks before, had their first shock after generator replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Some ICDpatients whose EF improves to >35% at generator replacement remain at risk for appropriate ICD shocks. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Yiyi Zhang; Eliseo Guallar; Robert G Weiss; Michael Stillabower; Gary Gerstenblith; Gordon F Tomaselli; Katherine C Wu Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Selcuk Adabag; Kristen K Patton; Alfred E Buxton; Thomas S Rector; Kristine E Ensrud; Kairav Vakil; Wayne C Levy; Jeanne E Poole Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Yiyi Zhang; Eliseo Guallar; Elena Blasco-Colmenares; Barbara Butcher; Sanaz Norgard; Victor Nauffal; Joseph E Marine; Zayd Eldadah; Timm Dickfeld; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Gordon F Tomaselli; Alan Cheng Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-08-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Vinay Kini; Mohamad Khaled Soufi; Rajat Deo; Andrew E Epstein; Rupa Bala; Michael Riley; Peter W Groeneveld; Alaa Shalaby; Sanjay Dixit Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 24.094