Literature DB >> 23743493

Incidence of appropriate shock in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients with improved ejection fraction.

Niyada Naksuk1, Ali Saab, Jian-Ming Li, Viorel Florea, Mehmet Akkaya, Inder S Anand, David G Benditt, Selcuk Adabag.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction (EF) is a recently described clinical entity. There is insufficient information on the management of implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients with improved EF at generator replacement. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We examined the incidence of appropriate shocks in 91 consecutive patients with ICDs for primary prevention of sudden death who underwent generator replacement. Improved EF was defined as both EF >35% at generator replacement and increase in EF by ≥10% since original implantation. Patients were 70 ± 11 years old, and 76% had ischemic cardiomyopathy. At generator replacement, 25 patients (27%) had improved EF (0.49 ± 0.08 vs 0.31 ± 0.07 at baseline; P < .0001). Over 6.2 ± 2.2 years of follow-up after original implantation, 9 patients (36%) with improved EF versus 19 (29%) with unchanged EF had appropriate ICD shocks (P = .51). Incidence of appropriate ICD shocks was similar between the two groups before (P = .90) and after (P = .97) generator replacement. Of the 9 improved EF patients with appropriate shock, 4 had shocks before generator replacement, 2 had shocks before and after generator replacement, and 3 patients, who never had shocks before, had their first shock after generator replacement.
CONCLUSIONS: Some ICD patients whose EF improves to >35% at generator replacement remain at risk for appropriate ICD shocks. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23743493     DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2013.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Fail        ISSN: 1071-9164            Impact factor:   5.712


  13 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of "Heart Failure with Recovered Ejection Fraction": What do we do After Recovery?

Authors:  Johny S Kuttab; Michael S Kiernan; Amanda R Vest
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-12

2.  Risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias following improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators implanted for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Jayasree Pillarisetti; Rakesh Gopinathannair; Matthew J Haney; Bassem Abazid; Wasiq Rawasia; Madhu Yeruva Reddy; Niveditha Adabala; Sudharani Bommana; Martin Emert; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Associations between scar characteristics by cardiac magnetic resonance and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction in primary prevention defibrillator recipients.

Authors:  Yiyi Zhang; Eliseo Guallar; Robert G Weiss; Michael Stillabower; Gary Gerstenblith; Gordon F Tomaselli; Katherine C Wu
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 4.  What to do about primary-prevention implantable cardiac defibrillators in patients with improved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Niyada Naksuk; Selcuk Adabag
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2014-06

Review 5.  When Is It Safe Not to Reimplant an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator at the Time of Battery Depletion?

Authors:  Sana M Al-Khatib; Daniel J Friedman; Gillian D Sanders
Journal:  Card Electrophysiol Clin       Date:  2018-03

6.  VV' Alternans Triplets on Near-Field ICD Intracardiac Electrogram is Associated with Mortality.

Authors:  Mathias Baumert; Muammar M Kabir; Khidir Dalouk; Charles A Henrikson; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Association of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators With Survival in Patients With and Without Improved Ejection Fraction: Secondary Analysis of the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial.

Authors:  Selcuk Adabag; Kristen K Patton; Alfred E Buxton; Thomas S Rector; Kristine E Ensrud; Kairav Vakil; Wayne C Levy; Jeanne E Poole
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

8.  Association of cardiac implantable electronic devices with survival in bifascicular block and prolonged PR interval on electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Naeem Moulki; Jessica V Kealhofer; David G Benditt; Amy Gravely; Kairav Vakil; Santiago Garcia; Selcuk Adabag
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Changes in Follow-Up Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Associated With Outcomes in Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Recipients.

Authors:  Yiyi Zhang; Eliseo Guallar; Elena Blasco-Colmenares; Barbara Butcher; Sanaz Norgard; Victor Nauffal; Joseph E Marine; Zayd Eldadah; Timm Dickfeld; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Gordon F Tomaselli; Alan Cheng
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Appropriateness of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators at the time of generator replacement: are indications still met?

Authors:  Vinay Kini; Mohamad Khaled Soufi; Rajat Deo; Andrew E Epstein; Rupa Bala; Michael Riley; Peter W Groeneveld; Alaa Shalaby; Sanjay Dixit
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.