Yiyi Zhang1, Eliseo Guallar1, Elena Blasco-Colmenares2, Barbara Butcher2, Sanaz Norgard2, Victor Nauffal2, Joseph E Marine2, Zayd Eldadah3, Timm Dickfeld4, Kenneth A Ellenbogen5, Gordon F Tomaselli2, Alan Cheng6. 1. Department of Epidemiology and the Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC. 4. University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 5. Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia. 6. Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: alcheng@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heart failure patients with primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) may experience an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) over time. However, it is unclear how LVEF improvement affects subsequent risk for mortality and sudden cardiac death. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess changes in LVEF after ICD implantation and the implication of these changes on subsequent mortality and ICD shocks. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 538 patients with repeated LVEF assessments after ICD implantation for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. The primary endpoint was appropriate ICD shock defined as a shock for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 4.9 years, LVEF decreased in 13.0%, improved in 40.0%, and was unchanged in 47.0% of the patients. In the multivariate Cox models comparing patients with an improved LVEF with those with an unchanged LVEF, the hazard ratios were 0.33 (95% confidence interval: 0.18 to 0.59) for mortality and 0.29 (95% confidence interval: 0.11 to 0.78) for appropriate shock. During follow-up, 25% of patients showed an improvement in LVEF to >35% and their risk of appropriate shock decreased but was not eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: Among primary prevention ICD patients, 40.0% had an improved LVEF during follow-up and 25% had LVEF improved to >35%. Changes in LVEF were inversely associated with all-cause mortality and appropriate shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In patients whose follow-up LVEF improved to >35%, the risk of an appropriate shock remained but was markedly decreased.
BACKGROUND:Heart failurepatients with primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) may experience an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) over time. However, it is unclear how LVEF improvement affects subsequent risk for mortality and sudden cardiac death. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess changes in LVEF after ICD implantation and the implication of these changes on subsequent mortality and ICD shocks. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 538 patients with repeated LVEF assessments after ICD implantation for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. The primary endpoint was appropriate ICD shock defined as a shock for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 4.9 years, LVEF decreased in 13.0%, improved in 40.0%, and was unchanged in 47.0% of the patients. In the multivariate Cox models comparing patients with an improved LVEF with those with an unchanged LVEF, the hazard ratios were 0.33 (95% confidence interval: 0.18 to 0.59) for mortality and 0.29 (95% confidence interval: 0.11 to 0.78) for appropriate shock. During follow-up, 25% of patients showed an improvement in LVEF to >35% and their risk of appropriate shock decreased but was not eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: Among primary prevention ICDpatients, 40.0% had an improved LVEF during follow-up and 25% had LVEF improved to >35%. Changes in LVEF were inversely associated with all-cause mortality and appropriate shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In patients whose follow-up LVEF improved to >35%, the risk of an appropriate shock remained but was markedly decreased.
Authors: Philip F Binkley; Amanda Lesinski; Jeanette Pohorence Ferguson; Patricia S Hatton; Laura Yamokoski; Sheetal Hardikar; Glen E Cooke; Carl V Leier Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2007-09-27 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Andrew E Epstein; John P DiMarco; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Roger A Freedman; Leonard S Gettes; A Marc Gillinov; Gabriel Gregoratos; Stephen C Hammill; David L Hayes; Mark A Hlatky; L Kristin Newby; Richard L Page; Mark H Schoenfeld; Michael J Silka; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Michael O Sweeney; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffrey L Anderson; Christopher E Buller; Mark A Creager; Steven M Ettinger; David P Faxon; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon A Hunt; Harlan M Krumholz; Frederick G Kushner; Bruce W Lytle; Rick A Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel; Lynn G Tarkington; Clyde W Yancy Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gust H Bardy; Kerry L Lee; Daniel B Mark; Jeanne E Poole; Douglas L Packer; Robin Boineau; Michael Domanski; Charles Troutman; Jill Anderson; George Johnson; Steven E McNulty; Nancy Clapp-Channing; Linda D Davidson-Ray; Elizabeth S Fraulo; Daniel P Fishbein; Richard M Luceri; John H Ip Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-01-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M Packer; W S Colucci; J D Sackner-Bernstein; C S Liang; D A Goldscher; I Freeman; M L Kukin; V Kinhal; J E Udelson; M Klapholz; S S Gottlieb; D Pearle; R J Cody; J J Gregory; N E Kantrowitz; T H LeJemtel; S T Young; M A Lukas; N H Shusterman Journal: Circulation Date: 1996-12-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jane E Wilcox; Gregg C Fonarow; Clyde W Yancy; Nancy M Albert; Anne B Curtis; J Thomas Heywood; Patches Johnson Inge; Mark L McBride; Mandeep R Mehra; Christopher M O'Connor; Dwight Reynolds; Mary Norine Walsh; Mihai Gheorghiade Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Lorne J Gula; George J Klein; Anne S Hellkamp; David Massel; Andrew D Krahn; Allan C Skanes; Raymond Yee; Jill Anderson; George W Johnson; Jeanne E Poole; Daniel B Mark; Kerry L Lee; Gust H Bardy Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2008-11-06 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Cecilia Linde; William T Abraham; Michael R Gold; Martin St John Sutton; Stefano Ghio; Claude Daubert Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-11-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Alan Cheng; Darshan Dalal; Barbara Butcher; Sanaz Norgard; Yiyi Zhang; Timm Dickfeld; Zayd A Eldadah; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Eliseo Guallar; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Yiyi Zhang; Eliseo Guallar; Robert G Weiss; Michael Stillabower; Gary Gerstenblith; Gordon F Tomaselli; Katherine C Wu Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Malini Madhavan; Jonathan W Waks; Paul A Friedman; Daniel B Kramer; Alfred E Buxton; Peter A Noseworthy; Ramila A Mehta; David O Hodge; Angela Y Higgins; Tracy L Webster; Chance M Witt; Yong-Mei Cha; Bernard J Gersh Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2016-03
Authors: Daniel J Friedman; Marat Fudim; Robert Overton; Linda K Shaw; Divyang Patel; Sean D Pokorney; Eric J Velazquez; Sana M Al-Khatib Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Selcuk Adabag; Kristen K Patton; Alfred E Buxton; Thomas S Rector; Kristine E Ensrud; Kairav Vakil; Wayne C Levy; Jeanne E Poole Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Camila M Urzua Fresno; Luciano Folador; Tamar Shalmon; Faisal Mhd Dib Hamad; Sheldon M Singh; Gauri R Karur; Nigel S Tan; Iqwal Mangat; Anish Kirpalani; Binita Riya Chacko; Laura Jimenez-Juan; Andrew T Yan; Djeven P Deva Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Belén Alvarez-Alvarez; Javier García-Seara; Jose L Martínez-Sande; Moisés Rodríguez-Mañero; Xesús A Fernández López; Laila González-Melchor; Diego Iglesias-Alvarez; Francisco Gude; Carla Díaz-Louzao; José R González-Juanatey Journal: J Arrhythm Date: 2021-03-21