Literature DB >> 23743370

Costs and clinical outcomes of conventional single port and micro-laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Edward Chekan1, Matthew Moore, Tina D Hunter, Candace Gunnarsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: This study compares hospital costs and clinical outcomes for conventional laparoscopic, single-port, and mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy from US hospitals.
METHODS: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years and undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with records in the Premier Hospital Database from 2009 through the second quarter of 2010. Patients were categorized into 3 groups-conventional laparoscopic, single port, or mini-laparoscopic-based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes and hospital charge descriptions for surgical tools used. A procedure was considered mini-laparoscopic if no single-port surgery products were identified in the charge master descriptions and the patient record showed that at least 1 product measuring 5 mm was used, not more than 1 product measuring <5 mm was used, and the measurements of the other products identified equaled >5 mm. Summary statistics were generated for all 3 groups. Multivariable analyses were performed on hospital costs and clinical outcomes. Models were adjusted for demographics, patient severity, comorbid conditions, and hospital characteristics.
RESULTS: In the outpatient setting, for single-port surgery, hospital costs were approximately $834 more than those for mini-laparoscopic surgery and $964 more than those for conventional laparoscopic surgery (P < .0001). Adverse events were significantly higher (P < .0001) for single-port surgery compared with mini-laparoscopic surgery (95% confidence interval for odds ratio, 1.38-2.68) and single-port surgery versus conventional surgery (95% confidence interval for odds ratio, 1.37-2.35). Mini-laparoscopic surgery hospital costs were significantly (P < .0001) lower than the costs for conventional surgery by $211, and there were no significant differences in adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings should inform practice patterns, treatment guidelines, and payor policy in managing cholecystectomy patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23743370      PMCID: PMC3662743          DOI: 10.4293/108680812X13517013317635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JSLS        ISSN: 1086-8089            Impact factor:   2.172


INTRODUCTION

Cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed abdominal surgery procedures in the United States, with >750,000 cholecystectomies performed laparoscopically each year.[1,2] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy evolved from surgical attempts to improve patient outcomes, including postoperative morbidity, cosmetic results, hospital length of stay, and duration of convalescence.[3-5] Continued attempts to improve these outcomes have led to the development of alternatives to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC), including micro- or mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC) and, more recently, single-port cholecystectomy surgery (SPS).[6] However, understanding the effect of these emerging techniques on clinical and economic outcomes is critical to guiding practice patterns, clinical guidelines, and payor decisions. SPS is a technical departure from CLC in that it uses a single, transabdominal incision rather than multiple incisions for trocar insertion.[7,8] This procedure is typically performed with several trocars spaced closely together or with a multi-instrument port.[7-9] MLC is performed by use of percutaneous instrumentation or trocars that are significantly smaller in size than those used in conventional laparoscopic procedures. The procedure was primarily developed to reduce incisional pain. Studies have reported improvements in cosmetic outcome, pulmonary function, and overall satisfaction.[10-14] One small study did report that up to 38% of patients (5 of 13) required conversion from MLC to CLC.[10] The purpose of this article is a cost comparison of cholecystectomy approaches including conventional, single-port, and mini-laparoscopic surgeries. We performed our analysis using the Premier Hospital Database as a source of cost from the hospital perspective.

METHODS

A protocol describing the analysis objectives, criteria for patient selection, data elements of interest, and statistical methods was submitted to the New England Institutional Review Board, and exemption was obtained (No. 11–240).

Data Source

The Premier Hospital Database, which contains clinical and utilization information on patients receiving care in 442 hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers across the United States during the period of interest, was used. Specifically, this database contains complete patient billing, hospital cost, and coding histories from more than 25 million inpatient discharges and 175 million hospital outpatient visits.[15] Data for 2009 through the second quarter of 2010 were used and anonymized with regard to patient identifiers.

Patients and Procedures

Eligible patients were those aged ≥18 years undergoing an outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes for identifying the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, diagnosis codes for identifying patient comorbid conditions, and all adverse events are listed in Appendices A, B, and C, respectively. Eligible patients with procedure codes identifying a laparoscopic cholecystectomy were then subdivided into 3 mutually exclusive groups: CLC, SPS, or MLC. Hospital charge descriptions for the surgical tools used were text mined to identify SPS procedures. The distinction between MLC and CLC was based on the size of the surgical instrument. MLC was defined by records of no SPS products identified in the charge master descriptions, record of at least 1 product <5 mm used; not more than 1 product >5 mm used, and any other products identified equaled 5 mm. Procedures that were not identified as SPS or MLC were considered CLC procedures.

Statistical Analyses

Initial counts, percentages, means, and standard deviations for demographics, comorbid conditions, hospital characteristics, safety, and cost outcomes were summarized for CLC, SPS, and MLC by use of descriptive statistics for patients in the outpatient setting. Safety outcomes of interest were selected from adverse events occurring during or up to 30 days after surgery. Cost outcomes were total hospital costs per patient, both fixed and variable. Because the sample size for the SPS group was very limited in the inpatient setting, univariate and multivariable analyses were performed on outpatient procedures only. Furthermore, by examining patients in the outpatient setting only, it was possible to analyze a more homogeneous patient population. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were run for binary outcomes, such as adverse events. Ordinary least squares regressions were used for the continuous outcome of hospital costs. For all models, the following explanatory variables were included: age, sex, race, marital status, insurance type, comorbid conditions (e.g., diabetes), census region of the hospital, rural versus urban hospitals, teaching versus nonteaching hospitals, and number of hospital beds. By use of these explanatory variables, multivariable models were estimated to isolate the effects of SPS versus CLC, SPS versus MLC, and MLC versus CLC on hospital costs. To eliminate cost outliers, both the upper 0.5% and lower 0.5% of costs were set to missing values. In addition to the trimming of outliers, a natural-log transformation of the costs was used as the dependent variable in multivariate models. Smearing estimates were then used to avoid the introduction of bias when we converted back to the untransformed dollar scale.[16] All analyses were performed with SAS software, version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

RESULTS

There were a total of 193,014 eligible laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures identified in the database from the period from the first quarter of 2009 through the second quarter of 2010. A patient attrition diagram is shown in . The majority of all procedures (59%, 116,823 of 196,628) were performed in the outpatient setting, with 98% (114,356) of these patients undergoing a CLC. For the remaining 2% of outpatient procedures (2,467), 527 SPS procedures and 1,940 MLC procedures were identified. As summarized in , characteristics of eligible outpatient procedures show that there were substantially more women than men, with rates for both dropping off after age 50 years. Regarding insurance, more patients had managed care than government or other sources of insurance. In the outpatient setting, the 3 procedure groups (SPS, MLC, and CLC) appear to be very well balanced overall in terms of patient demographics. Patient attrition is shown from all data from the first quarter (Q1) of 2009 to the second quarter (Q2) of 2010 to the subset used in our analysis. The analysis included patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code 51.23 or Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 47562, 47563, or 47564 whose gender was known, who were aged ≥18 years, and who underwent outpatient visits. Patient Characteristics The distribution of patient comorbidities is shown in and suggests a lower percentage of comorbidities overall in the SPS population, with the rates of many of the conditions as low as half of the rates in the other cohorts. Hypertension was the most common comorbid condition across all 3 groups. Comorbid Conditions

Unadjusted Analysis

The cholecystectomies studied were performed in 428 hospitals. Most procedures, as well as most patients, derived from urban, nonteaching, moderate- to large-sized hospitals in the South.[15] As noted earlier for the overall patient population, hospital characteristics were well balanced across all 3 surgical cohorts (CLC, MLC, and SPS). All adverse events are reported in . Events are subdivided into 5 categories: procedure related, systemic, other events, death, and bleeding. The most common complications were in the category of other events and included abdominal rigidity/tenderness, digestive system complications, gastroparesis paralytic ileus, nausea and vomiting, operative complications, and peritonitis. The overall adverse event rate was higher for SPS (12%) than for MLC (6%) and CLC (6%), with most of the events in all 3 groups falling into the “other events” category. The procedure-related systemic events, death and bleeding, were very infrequent (<0.5%) for all 3 groups. Adverse Events shows the unadjusted means and medians for hospital costs, as well as median surgery time, for each group. In the outpatient setting, CLC (median, $3,600.37) costs slightly more than MLC (median, $3,357.01) but less than SPS (median, $4,367.93). It is essential to adjust for a number of potential confounders in multivariable regression analyses, including patient demographics, comorbid conditions, and hospital characteristics. Unadjusted Utilization and Cost Outcomes

Adjusted Analysis

The results of adjusted analyses of costs and complication rates are shown in . After we adjusted for the aforementioned variables, adjusted mean hospital costs remained significantly higher (P < .0001) for SPS versus MLC ($4,680.40 vs $3,846.19) and SPS versus CLC ($5,313.96 vs $4,350.29). When we compared MLC versus CLC, cost differences were lower but still significant (P < .0001), with MLC at $4,137.23 versus CLC at $4,349.06. Multivariable Cost and Adverse Event Findings[a] All models are adjusted for patient demographics, comorbid conditions, patient severity, and hospital characteristics. CI=confidence interval; LS=least square; OR=odds ratio. Results of the multivariable logistic regressions for the likelihood of patients having an adverse event showed significant (P < .0001) odds ratios of 1.92 (95% confidence interval, 1.38–2.68) for SPS compared with MLC and 1.80 (95% confidence interval, 1.37–2.35) for SPS compared with CLC. However, when MLC was compared with CLC, the difference was not significant.

DISCUSSION

This retrospective analysis of a large, nationally representative database of hospitals and procedures found that patients undergoing SPS had higher adverse event rates than those undergoing MLC or CLC. The analysis also showed that SPS was associated with higher adjusted hospital outpatient costs than CLC but that MLC, when performed in this setting, was the least expensive. These findings are somewhat consistent with a recent review of SPS, which also raised concerns about the safety of the procedure, and a recent meta-analysis of primarily MLC procedures, which found similar rates of adverse events compared with patients undergoing CLC.[17,18]

Clinical Implications

Innovations in the surgical approach to performing cholecystectomy represent an important potential pathway to improving patient outcomes. The development and diffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to the United States that began more than 20 years ago heralded a reduction in postoperative mortality rates and days of convalescence for patients who would have otherwise been treated with open cholecystectomy.[2] This pattern of innovation continues with both SPS and MLC. However, continued improvements in patient outcomes can only be ensured with careful attention to the comparative effectiveness of these procedures relative to CLC, which constitutes most cholecystectomies currently performed in developed countries.[19] Adverse event rates in patients undergoing cholecystectomy in outpatient hospital centers were highest in patients treated with SPS compared with MLC and CLC and were comparable between patients treated with MLC and those treated with CLC. This difference appears to be driven by higher rates of bile duct obstruction, digestive system complications, gastroparesis, paralytic ileus, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and operative complications in the SPS population. The incidence of serious adverse events, including bile duct injury, thromboembolic events (including stroke and myocardial infarction), and hemorrhage, was low across all procedures and did not appear to be substantially different in patients undergoing SPS.

Economic Implications

Adjusted hospital outpatient costs were highest in patients undergoing SPS: SPS cost 18% more than MLC and 18% more than CLC, with a difference of $834 and $964, respectively (. The analyses also showed that MLC was associated with the lowest hospital costs. It is likely that the differences in adverse event rates detailed earlier contributed to the cost differences. Because otherwise healthy patients with reliable home support can leave the hospital within 6 hours of undergoing cholecystectomy, outpatient models of cholecystectomy are increasingly used.[20] The sources of variation in costs of cholecystectomy procedures performed in an outpatient setting should be explored further in future studies, but these findings of statistically significant differences between the cost of SPS and the cost of MLC or CLC may have important implications with regard to the cost of the procedure to the hospital or outpatient facility. With approximately 750,000 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed in the United States each year, any differences in procedure-related costs or savings could be significant and realizable.[1,2]

Limitations

This analysis was limited by the lack of more detailed information about patients and procedures. For instance, it would have been of interest to examine the influence of additional patient characteristics, such as weight or body mass index, and more procedure-related details. In the future, this may be possible as clinically rich datasets become available from greater use of electronic medical records in hospital settings, thereby facilitating analyses in these directions. The analyses of adverse event rates and the specific types of complications constituting these rates in patients undergoing SPS were also limited by a small sample size, particularly compared with the number of patients in the database who underwent MLC or CLC. Surgeon experience is a well-established predictor of the overall incidence of laparoscopic complications, and we were unable to adjust for this important variable.[21,22] The available data will likely become more robust over time as procedure volume increases. Even without access to the additional clinical detail available in electronic medical records, the Premier Hospital Database provides a strong basis for this analysis, given the very large numbers of patients and procedures that it provides, as well as the nationwide scope it represents.[15] Thus the cost of each procedure was based on costs across the Premier network. This analysis found MLC to have a statistically lower cost to the hospital in comparison with CLC. The reasons for these differences were not ascertained, and further study to understand these differences would be of interest.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of a large, nationally representative hospital claims database provides evidence that, in the outpatient setting, SPS costs approximately 18% more than MLC and CLC. Mini-laparoscopic surgery costs approximately 5% less than traditional laparoscopy. Although additional studies may be useful, these findings could help shape practice patterns, treatment guidelines, and payor policy in the management of patients requiring cholecystectomy.
Table 1.

Patient Characteristics

SPS (n = 527) (%)MLC (n = 1,940) (%)CLC (n = 114,356) (%)
Age
    18–40 yr282 (53.5)751 (38.7)43,452 (38.0)
    41–50 yr113 (21.4)411 (21.2)23,364 (20.4)
    51–60 yr76 (14.4)361 (18.6)21,703 (19.0)
    61–70 yr35 (6.6)258 (13.3)15,413 (13.5)
    71–80 yr17 (3.2)124 (6.4)8,068 (7.1)
    >80 yr4 (0.8)35 (1.8)2,356 (2.1)
Gender
    Female445 (84.4)1,443 (74.4)86,757 (75.9)
    Male82 (15.6)497 (25.6)27,599 (24.1)
Insurance
    Government108 (20.5)582 (30.0)35,410 (31.0)
    Managed care331 (62.8)1,090 (56.2)56,228 (49.2)
    Other88 (16.7)268 (13.8)22,718 (19.9)
Race
    White418 (79.3)1,318 (67.9)81,096 (70.9)
    African American22 (4.2)109 (5.6)8,358 (7.3)
    Hispanic27 (5.1)172 (8.9)7,509 (6.6)
    Other60 (11.4)341 (17.6)17,307 (15.1)
    Invalid code0 (0.0)0 (0.0)86 (0.1)
Table 2.

Comorbid Conditions

SPS (n = 527) (%)MLC (n = 1,940) (%)CLC (n = 114,356) (%)
Cardiomyopathy2 (0.4)15 (0.8)778 (0.7)
Cerebrovascular accident1 (0.2)11 (0.6)548 (0.5)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease14 (2.7)73 (3.8)4,232 (3.7)
Diabetes23 (4.4)170 (8.8)9,904 (8.7)
Ischemic heart disease, including myocardial infarction17 (3.2)131 (6.8)7,108 (6.2)
Hypertensive heart disease without heart failure2 (0.4)8 (0.4)566 (0.5)
Heart failure8 (1.5)40 (2.1)2,145 (1.9)
Hypertension86 (16.3)414 (21.3)24,664 (21.6)
Chronic liver disease/disorders14 (2.7)75 (3.9)6,425 (5.6)
Transient ischemic attack1 (0.2)16 (0.8)754 (0.7)
Table 3.

Adverse Events

SPS (n = 527) (%)MLC (n = 1,940) (%)CLC (n = 114,356) (%)
Procedure related
    Bile duct fistula0 (0.0)0 (0.0)7 (0.0)
    Bile duct obstruction2 (0.4)2 (0.1)195 (0.2)
    Bile duct perforation0 (0.0)0 (0.0)6 (0.0)
Systemic adverse events
    Cerebrovascular accident0 (0.0)1 (0.1)43 (0.0)
    Acute myocardial infarction0 (0.0)2 (0.1)37 (0.0)
    Transient ischemic attack0 (0.0)2 (0.1)46 (0.0)
    Other embolism0 (0.0)3 (0.2)120 (0.1)
    Pneumothorax0 (0.0)0 (0.0)16 (0.0)
    Pulmonary embolism1 (0.2)3 (0.2)95 (0.1)
Other adverse events
    Abdominal rigidity/tenderness0 (0.0)0 (0.0)114 (0.1)
    Digestive system complications8 (1.5)15 (0.8)735 (0.6)
    Gastroparesis paralytic ileus4 (0.8)7 (0.4)438 (0.4)
    Nausea and vomiting45 (8.5)86 (4.4)4,874 (4.3)
    Operative complication19 (3.6)30 (1.6)2,006 (1.8)
    Peritonitis (not specified)1 (0.2)3 (0.2)103 (0.1)
Death
    Death during procedure0 (0.0)0 (0.0)2 (0.0)
    Death after procedure0 (0.0)2 (0.1)35 (0.0)
Hemorrhage/bleeding
    Minor bleeding0 (0.0)0 (0.0)9 (0.0)
    Major bleeding0 (0.0)0 (0.0)20 (0.0)
Any one or more adverse event62 (11.8)123 (6.3)7,307 (6.4)
Table 4.

Unadjusted Utilization and Cost Outcomes

SPS (n = 527)MLC (n = 1,940)CLC (n = 114,356)
Surgery time (median, h)1.601.261.35
Anesthesia time (median, h)1.571.501.47
No. of readmissions (30 days after surgery) (%)20 (3.8)71 (3.7)3,200 (2.8)
Total hospital costs ($)
    Median4,367.933,357.013,600.37
    Mean4,573.743,814.353,964.67
    SD1,664.171,992.261,967.81
Table 5.

Multivariable Cost and Adverse Event Findings[a]

LS[b] Mean95% CI[b] for LS MeanOR[b]95% CI for ORP Value
SPS/MLC outpatients (n = 2,535)
        Total hospital costs ($)
            SPS$4,680.40$4,480.96–$4,888.73< .0001
            MLC$3,846.19$3,722.38–$3,974.11
        Adverse events (any adverse event/none)
            SPS vs MLC1.921.38–2.68.0001
SPS/CLC outpatients (n = 114,883)
        Total hospital costs ($)
            SPS$5,313.96$5,119.09–$5,516.25< .0001
            CLC$4,350.29$4,276.75–$4,425.09
        Adverse events (any adverse event/none)
            SPS vs CLC1.801.37–2.35< .0001
MLC/CLC outpatients (n = 116,296)
        Total hospital costs ($)
            MLC$4,137.23$4,037.97–$4,238.93< .0001
            CLC$4,349.06$4,275.54–$4,423.85
        Adverse events (any adverse event/none)
            MLC vs CLC1.010.84–1.21.9333

All models are adjusted for patient demographics, comorbid conditions, patient severity, and hospital characteristics.

CI=confidence interval; LS=least square; OR=odds ratio.

Appendix A.

Procedure Codes for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Description
ICD-9[a] code
    51.23Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    51.24Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy
CPT[a] code
    47562Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    47563Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with cholangiography
    47564Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with exploration of common duct

CPT=Current Procedural Terminology; ICD-9=International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision.

Appendix B.

Diagnosis Codes for Comorbid Conditions

EventICD-9[a] CodeDescription
Transient ischemic attack435.8Other specified transient cerebral ischemia
435.9Unspecified transient cerebral ischemia
Cerebrovascular accident430Subarachnoid hemorrhage
431Intracerebral hemorrhage
432Nontraumatic extradural hemorrhage
432.1Subdural hemorrhage
432.9Unspecified intracranial hemorrhage
433.01Occlusion and stenosis, basilar artery, with cerebral infarction
433.11Occlusion and stenosis, carotid artery, with cerebral infarction
433.21Occlusion and stenosis, vertebral artery, with cerebral infarction
433.31Occlusion and stenosis, multiple and bilateral precerebral arteries, with cerebral infarction
433.81Occlusion and stenosis, other specified precerebral artery, with cerebral infarction
433.91Occlusion and stenosis, unspecified precerebral artery, with cerebral infarction
434.01Cerebral thrombosis, with cerebral infarction
434.11Cerebral embolism, with cerebral infarction
434.91Cerebral artery occlusion, unspecified, with cerebral infarction
997.02Iatrogenic cerebrovascular infarction or hemorrhage
Diabetes249Secondary diabetes mellitus
249.01Secondary diabetes mellitus without mention of complication, uncontrolled
249.1Secondary diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis
249.11Secondary diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis, uncontrolled
249.2Secondary diabetes mellitus with hyperosmolarity
249.21Secondary diabetes mellitus with hyperosmolarity, uncontrolled
249.3Secondary diabetes mellitus with other coma
249.31Secondary diabetes mellitus with other coma, uncontrolled
249.4Secondary diabetes mellitus with renal manifestations
249.41Secondary diabetes mellitus with renal manifestations, uncontrolled
249.5Secondary diabetes mellitus with ophthalmic manifestations
249.51Secondary diabetes mellitus with ophthalmic manifestations, uncontrolled
249.6Secondary diabetes mellitus with neurological manifestations
249.61Secondary diabetes mellitus with neurological manifestations, uncontrolled
249.7Secondary diabetes mellitus with peripheral circulatory disorders
249.71Secondary diabetes mellitus with peripheral circulatory disorders, uncontrolled
249.8Secondary diabetes mellitus with other specified manifestations
249.81Secondary diabetes mellitus with other specified manifestations, uncontrolled
249.9Secondary diabetes mellitus with unspecified complication
249.91Secondary diabetes mellitus with unspecified complication, uncontrolled
250Diabetes mellitus
250.01Diabetes mellitus without mention of complication, type I (juvenile type), not stated as uncontrolled
250.02Diabetes mellitus without mention of complication, type II or unspecified type, uncontrolled
250.03Diabetes mellitus without mention of complication, type I (juvenile type), uncontrolled
250.1Diabetes with ketoacidosis, type II or unspecified type, not stated as uncontrolled
250.11Diabetes with ketoacidosis, type I (juvenile type), not stated as uncontrolled
250.12Diabetes with ketoacidosis, type II or unspecified type, uncontrolled
250.13Diabetes with ketoacidosis, type I (juvenile type), uncontrolled
250.2Diabetes with hyperosmolarity
250.21Diabetes with hyperosmolarity, type I (juvenile type), not stated as uncontrolled
250.22Diabetes with hyperosmolarity, type II or unspecified type, uncontrolled
250.23Diabetes with hyperosmolarity, type I (juvenile type), uncontrolled
250.3Diabetes with other coma
250.31Diabetes with other coma, type I (juvenile type), not stated as uncontrolled
250.32Diabetes with other coma, type II or unspecified type, uncontrolled
250.33Diabetes with other coma, type I (juvenile type), uncontrolled
250.4Diabetes with renal manifestations
250.41Diabetes with renal manifestations, type I (juvenile type), not stated as uncontrolled
250.42Diabetes with renal manifestations, type II or unspecified type, uncontrolled
250.43Diabetes with renal manifestations, type I (juvenile type), uncontrolled
250.5Diabetes with ophthalmic manifestations
250.51Diabetes with ophthalmic manifestations, type I (juvenile type), not stated as uncontrolled
250.52Diabetes with ophthalmic manifestations, type II or unspecified type, uncontrolled
250.53Diabetes with ophthalmic manifestations, type I (juvenile type), uncontrolled
250.6Diabetes with neurological manifestations, type II or unspecified type, not stated as uncontrolled
250.61Diabetes with neurological manifestations, type I (juvenile type), not stated as uncontrolled
250.62Diabetes with neurological manifestations, type II or unspecified type, uncontrolled
250.63Diabetes with neurological manifestations, type I (juvenile type), uncontrolled
250.7Diabetes with peripheral circulatory disorders
250.71Diabetes with peripheral circulatory disorders, type I (juvenile type), not stated as uncontrolled
250.72Diabetes with peripheral circulatory disorders, type II or unspecified type, uncontrolled
250.73Diabetes with peripheral circulatory disorders, type I (juvenile type), uncontrolled
250.8Diabetes with other specified manifestations
250.81Diabetes with other specified manifestations, type I (juvenile type), not stated as uncontrolled
250.82Diabetes with other specified manifestations, type II or unspecified type, uncontrolled
250.83Diabetes with other specified manifestations, type I (juvenile type), uncontrolled
250.9Diabetes with unspecified complication
250.91Diabetes with unspecified complication, type I (juvenile type), not stated as uncontrolled
250.92Diabetes with unspecified complication, type II or unspecified type, uncontrolled
250.93Diabetes with unspecified complication, type I (juvenile type), uncontrolled
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease491.1Mucopurulent chronic bronchitis
491.2Obstructive chronic bronchitis
491.21Obstructive chronic bronchitis with (acute) exacerbation
491.22Obstructive chronic bronchitis with acute bronchitis
491.8Other chronic bronchitis
491.9Unspecified chronic bronchitis
492Emphysema
492.0Emphysematous bleb
492.8Other emphysema
493.2Chronic obstructive asthma
493.20Chronic obstructive asthma, unspecified
493.21Chronic obstructive asthma with status asthmaticus
493.22Chronic obstructive asthma with (acute) exacerbation
494Bronchiectasis
494.0Bronchiectasis without acute exacerbation
494.1Bronchiectasis with acute exacerbation
496Chronic airway obstruction, not elsewhere classified
Chronic liver disease/disorders571.xChronic liver disease and cirrhosis
571.4xChronic hepatitis
572.xLiver abscess and sequelae of chronic liver disease
573.xOther disorders of liver
Hypertension401Essential hypertension
401.0Malignant essential hypertension
401.1Benign essential hypertension
401.9Unspecified essential hypertension
405Secondary hypertension
405.0Malignant secondary hypertension
405.01Malignant renovascular hypertension
405.09Other malignant secondary hypertension
405.1Benign secondary hypertension
405.11Benign renovascular hypertension
405.19Other benign secondary hypertension
405.9Unspecified secondary hypertension
405.91Unspecified renovascular hypertension
405.99Other unspecified secondary hypertension
Ischemic heart disease, including myocardial infarction410Acute myocardial infarction
410.0Acute myocardial infarction of anterolateral wall
410.01Acute myocardial infarction of anterolateral wall, initial episode of care
410.02Acute myocardial infarction of anterolateral wall, subsequent episode of care
410.1Acute myocardial infarction of other anterior wall
410.10Acute myocardial infarction of other anterior wall, episode of care unspecified
410.11Acute myocardial infarction of other anterior wall, initial episode of care
410.12Acute myocardial infarction of other anterior wall, subsequent episode of care
410.2Acute myocardial infarction of inferolateral wall
410.20Acute myocardial infarction of inferolateral wall, episode of care unspecified
410.21Acute myocardial infarction of inferolateral wall, initial episode of care
410.22Acute myocardial infarction of inferolateral wall, subsequent episode of care
410.3Acute myocardial infarction of inferoposterior wall
410.30Acute myocardial infarction of inferoposterior wall, episode of care unspecified
410.31Acute myocardial infarction of inferoposterior wall, initial episode of care
410.32Acute myocardial infarction of inferoposterior wall, subsequent episode of care
410.4Acute myocardial infarction of other inferior wall
410.40Acute myocardial infarction of other inferior wall, episode of care unspecified
410.41Acute myocardial infarction of other inferior wall, initial episode of care
410.42Acute myocardial infarction of other inferior wall, subsequent episode of care
410.5Acute myocardial infarction of other lateral wall
410.50Acute myocardial infarction of other lateral wall, episode of care unspecified
410.51Acute myocardial infarction of other lateral wall, initial episode of care
410.52Acute myocardial infarction of other lateral wall, subsequent episode of care
410.6Acute myocardial infarction of posterior wall infarction
410.61Acute posterior wall infarction, initial episode of care
410.62Acute posterior wall infarction, subsequent episode of care
410.7Subendocardial infarction
410.70Subendocardial infarction, episode of care unspecified
410.71Subendocardial infarction, initial episode of care
410.72Subendocardial infarction, subsequent episode of care
410.8Acute myocardial infarction of other specified sites
410.80Acute myocardial infarction of other specified sites, episode of care unspecified
410.81Acute myocardial infarction of other specified sites, initial episode of care
410.82Acute myocardial infarction of other specified sites, subsequent episode of care
410.9Acute myocardial infarction of unspecified site
410.90Acute myocardial infarction of unspecified site, episode of care unspecified
410.91Acute myocardial infarction of unspecified site, initial episode of care
410.92Acute myocardial infarction of unspecified site, subsequent episode of care
411Other acute and subacute forms of ischemic heart disease
411.0Postmyocardial infarction syndrome
411.1Intermediate coronary syndrome
411.8Other acute and subacute forms of ischemic heart disease
411.81Acute coronary occlusion without myocardial infarction
411.89Other acute and subacute forms of ischemic heart disease, other
412Old myocardial infarction
413Angina pectoris
413.0Angina decubitus
413.1Prinzmetal angina
413.9Other and unspecified angina pectoris
414Other forms of chronic ischemic heart disease
414.0Coronary atherosclerosis
414.00Coronary atherosclerosis of unspecified type of vessel, native or graft
414.01Coronary atherosclerosis of native coronary artery
414.02Coronary atherosclerosis of autologous vein bypass graft
414.03Coronary atherosclerosis of nonautologous biological bypass graft
414.04Coronary atherosclerosis of artery bypass graft
414.05Coronary atherosclerosis of unspecified bypass graft
414.06Coronary atherosclerosis of native coronary artery of transplanted heart
414.07Coronary atherosclerosis of bypass graft transplanted heart
414.1Aneurysm and dissection of heart
414.10Aneurysm of heart (wall)
414.11Aneurysm of coronary vessels
414.12Dissection of coronary artery
414.19Other aneurysm of heart
414.2Chronic total occlusion of coronary artery
414.3Coronary atherosclerosis due to lipid rich plaque
414.8Other specified forms of chronic ischemic heart disease
414.9Chronic ischemic heart disease, unspecified
Heart failure398.91Rheumatic heart failure (congestive)
402.01Benign hypertensive heart disease without heart failure
402.11Benign hypertensive heart disease with heart failure
402.91Unspecified hypertensive heart disease with heart failure
404.01Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, malignant, with heart failure and with chronic kidney disease stage I through stage IV, or unspecified
404.03Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, malignant, with heart failure and with chronic kidney disease stage V or end stage renal disease
404.11Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, benign, with heart failure and with chronic kidney disease stage I through stage IV, or unspecified
404.13Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, benign, with heart failure and chronic kidney disease stage V or end stage renal disease
404.91Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, unspecified, with heart failure and with chronic kidney disease stage I through stage IV, or unspecified
404.93Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, unspecified, with heart failure and chronic kidney disease stage V or end stage renal disease
428Heart failure
428.0Congestive heart failure, unspecified
428.1Left heart failure
428.2Systolic heart failure
428.21Acute systolic heart failure
428.22Chronic systolic heart failure
428.23Acute on chronic systolic heart failure
428.3Diastolic heart failure
428.31Acute diastolic heart failure
428.32Chronic diastolic heart failure
428.33Acute on chronic diastolic heart failure
428.4Combined systolic and diastolic heart failure
428.41Acute combined systolic and diastolic heart failure
428.42Chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure
428.43Acute on chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure
428.9Heart failure, unspecified
Cardiomyopathy425Cardiomyopathy
425.0Endomyocardial fibrosis
425.1Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
425.2Obscure cardiomyopathy of Africa
425.3Endocardial fibroelastosis
425.4Other primary cardiomyopathies
425.5Alcoholic cardiomyopathy
425.7Nutritional and metabolic cardiomyopathy
425.8Cardiomyopathy in other diseases classified elsewhere
425.9Secondary cardiomyopathy, unspecified
Hypertensive heart disease without heart failure402Hypertensive heart disease
402.0Malignant hypertensive heart disease
402.1Benign hypertensive heart disease
402.10Benign hypertensive heart disease without heart failure
402.9Unspecified hypertensive heart disease
404Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease
404.02Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, malignant, without heart failure and with chronic kidney disease stage V or end stage renal disease
404.1Benign hypertensive heart and renal disease
404.12Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, benign, without heart failure and with chronic kidney disease stage V or end stage renal disease
404.9Unspecified hypertensive heart and renal disease
404.90Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, unspecified, without heart failure and with chronic kidney disease stage I through stage IV, or unspecified
404.92Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, unspecified, without heart failure and with chronic kidney disease stage V or end stage renal disease

ICD-9=International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision.

Appendix C.

Diagnosis Codes for Adverse Events

EventICD-9[a] CodeDescription
Transient ischemic attack435.8Other specified transient cerebral ischemia
435.9Unspecified transient cerebral ischemia
Cerebrovascular accident430Subarachnoid hemorrhage
431Intracerebral hemorrhage
432.0Nontraumatic extradural hemorrhage
432.1Subdural hemorrhage
432.9Unspecified intracranial hemorrhage
433.01Occlusion and stenosis, basilar artery, with cerebral infarction
433.11Occlusion and stenosis, carotid artery, with cerebral infarction
433.21Occlusion and stenosis, vertebral artery, with cerebral infarction
433.31Occlusion and stenosis, multiple and bilateral precerebral arteries, with cerebral infarction
433.81Occlusion and stenosis, other specified precerebral artery, with cerebral infarction
433.91Occlusion and stenosis, unspecified precerebral artery, with cerebral infarction
434.01Cerebral thrombosis, with cerebral infarction
434.11Cerebral embolism, with cerebral infarction
434.91Cerebral artery occlusion, unspecified, with cerebral infarction
997.02Iatrogenic cerebrovascular infarction or hemorrhage
Acute myocardial infarction410.01Acute myocardial infarction, anterolateral wall
410.11Acute myocardial infarction, other anterior wall
410.21Acute myocardial infarction, inferolateral wall
410.31Acute myocardial infarction, inferoposterior wall
410.41Acute myocardial infarction, other inferior wall
410.51Acute myocardial infarction, other lateral wall
410.61Acute myocardial infarction, true posterior wall
410.71Acute myocardial infarction, subendocardial (NSTEMI[a])
410.81Acute myocardial infarction, other sites
410.91Acute myocardial infarction, unspecified site
Pneumothorax512.0Spontaneous tension pneumothorax
512.1Iatrogenic pneumothorax
512.8Other spontaneous pneumothorax
Pulmonary embolism415.1Pulmonary embolism and infarction
415.11Iatrogenic pulmonary embolism and infarction
415.12Septic pulmonary embolism
415.19Other pulmonary embolism and infarction
Other embolism453.4Acute venous embolism and thrombosis of deep vessels of lower extremity
453.41Acute venous embolism and thrombosis of deep vessels of proximal lower extremity
453.42Acute venous embolism and thrombosis of deep vessels of distal lower extremity
453.8Acute venous embolism and thrombosis of other specified veins
453.9Other venous embolism and thrombosis of unspecified site
Operative complication997.1Cardiac complications
997.2Peripheral vascular complications
997.3Respiratory complications
997.31Ventilator associated pneumonia
997.39Other respiratory complications
997.4Digestive system
997.5Urinary tract
997.7Vascular complications of other vessels
998Other complications of procedures
998.xOther complications of procedures
998.xxOther complications of procedures
Other adverse events997.4Digestive system complications
789.4xAbdominal rigidity/tenderness
789.6xAbdominal rigidity/tenderness
536.2Nausea and vomiting nausea
564.3Nausea and vomiting nausea
787.0xNausea and vomiting nausea
536.3Gastroparesis paralytic ileus
560.1Gastroparesis paralytic ileus
567.9Peritonitis not specified
567.8xPeritonitis not specified
576.2Bile duct obstruction
576.3Bile duct perforation
576.4Bile duct fistula

ICD-9=International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision; NSTEMI=non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

  20 in total

Review 1.  Critical appraisal of single port access cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P Allemann; M Schafer; N Demartines
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Biliary injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: why still a problem?

Authors:  Charles M Vollmer; Mark P Callery
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Steven E Hodgett; Jonathan M Hernandez; Connor A Morton; Sharona B Ross; Michael Albrink; Alexander S Rosemurgy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Surgeon volume metrics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Csikesz; Anand Singla; Melissa M Murphy; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adults and children: tools and techniques.

Authors:  Todd A Ponsky
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: early experience in comparison with the gold standard.

Authors:  Scott R Philipp; Brent W Miedema; Klaus Thaler
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Prospective randomized blinded trial of pulmonary function, pain, and cosmetic results after laparoscopic vs. microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  W Schwenk; J Neudecker; J Mall; B Böhm; J M Müller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial.

Authors:  T Bisgaard; B Klarskov; R Trap; H Kehlet; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M J Curet; M Contreras; D M Weber; R Albrecht
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis.

Authors:  B D Schirmer; S B Edge; J Dix; M J Hyser; J B Hanks; R S Jones
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  9 in total

1.  Understanding drivers of hospital charge variation for episodes of care among patients undergoing hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.

Authors:  Aslam Ejaz; Yuhree Kim; Gaya Spolverato; Ryan Taylor; John Hundt; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Synchronous primary colorectal and liver metastasis: impact of operative approach on clinical outcomes and hospital charges.

Authors:  Aslam Ejaz; Eugene Semenov; Gaya Spolverato; Yuhree Kim; Dylan Tanner; John Hundt; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Virtual Intraoperative Cholangiogram Using WebCL.

Authors:  Alexander Yu; Doga Demirel; Tansel Halic; Sinan Kockara
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2016

4.  Bikini Line Sleeve Gastrectomy: Initial Report.

Authors:  Tamer N Abdelbaki
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 5.  Minilaparoscopic versus single incision cholecystectomy for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Xuan Tan; Guobin Wang; Yong Tang; Jie Bai; Kaixiong Tao; Lin Ye
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Laparoscopic Single-Port Versus Traditional Multi-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Marco Casaccia; Denise Palombo; Andrea Razzore; Emma Firpo; Fabio Gallo; Rosario Fornaro
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Randomized controlled trial of single incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Denis Klein; Atakan Görkem Barutcu; Dino Kröll; Maik Kilian; Johann Pratschke; Roland Raakow; Jonas Raakow
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Health-Related Quality of Life After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Qurrat Al Ain Atif; Mumtaz A Khan; Faisal Nadeem; Muneeb Ullah
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-11

9.  Is mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy any better than the gold standard?: A comparative study.

Authors:  Haris R Shaikh; Asad Abbas; Salik Aleem; Miqdad R Lakhani
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.