Literature DB >> 11928028

Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial.

T Bisgaard1, B Klarskov, R Trap, H Kehlet, J Rosenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Downsizing the port incisions may reduce pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: In a double-blind controlled study, 60 patients were randomized to undergo either microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy using one 10-mm and three 3.5-mm trocars (3.5-mm LC) or traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy using two 10-mm and two 5-mm trocars (LC). Incisional pain at each port incision and overall pain were recorded for 1 week after the operation. Fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pulmonary function, and cosmetic results were also measured.
RESULTS: Data from 52 patients were analyzed; eight patients were excluded from the study for various reasons. One patient was converted from 3.5-mm LC to LC due to technical problems with the 3.5-mm optic. In the 3.5-mm LC group (n = 25), incisional pain was significantly decreased in the 1st postoperative week as compared with the LC group (n = 27) (p <0.01). In both groups, pain scores at the supraumbilical 10-mm port were significantly higher compared with other port sites (p <0.05). The cosmetic results were significantly better in the 3.5-mm LC group (p <0.01). There were no significant differences in any of the other variables.
CONCLUSION: The use of 3.5-mm trocars is feasible in LC, and it both reduces incisional pain and improves the cosmetic result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11928028     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-9026-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  41 in total

1.  A simple technique for removal of the gallbladder during microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M A C Machado; P Herman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Is there still any role for minilaparoscopic-cholecystectomy? A general surgeons' last five years experience over 932 cases.

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Natalino Bedin
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2011-11-11

3.  Single-port laparoscopic surgery is applicable to most gynecologic surgery: a single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Maria Lee; Sang Wun Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Ga Won Yim; Sunghoon Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  H Kehlet; A W Gray; F Bonnet; F Camu; H B J Fischer; R F McCloy; E A M Neugebauer; M M Puig; N Rawal; C J P Simanski
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for the treatment of benign adnexal diseases: a pilot study.

Authors:  Anna Fagotti; Francesco Fanfani; Francesco Marocco; Cristiano Rossitto; Valerio Gallotta; Elisabetta Marana; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Minilaparoscopic colorectal resection: a preliminary experience and an outcomes comparison with classical laparoscopic colon procedures.

Authors:  Em Santoro; F Agresta; S Veltri; G Mulieri; N Bedin; M Mulieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy : scarless cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Tae Ho Hong; Young Kyoung You; Keun Ho Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Incisions do not simply sum.

Authors:  Thane Blinman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Veress needle: a simple liver retraction technique for lap band positioning in (single incision laparoscopic technique) SILS.

Authors:  Segato Gianni; Maurizio De Luca; Banzato Oscar; Ceoloni Andrea; Busetto Luca; Ashton David; Favretti Franco
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 10.  Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Rory McCloy; Delia Randall; Stephan A Schug; Henrik Kehlet; Christian Simanski; Francis Bonnet; Frederic Camu; Barrie Fischer; Girish Joshi; Narinder Rawal; Edmund A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.