Literature DB >> 23742844

No untoward effects of smoking cues in anti-smoking public service announcements.

Mary Falcone1, Caryn Lerman, Joseph N Cappella, Paul Sanborn, Christopher Jepson, Andrew A Strasser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anti-smoking public service announcements (PSAs) often include smoking-related cues; however, visual drug cues can trigger acute cravings that may impede cognitive processing of the anti-smoking message. This experiment evaluated effects of smoking cues in PSAs on smoking urges, immediate smoking behavior, and persuasion measures in daily smokers.
METHODS: Three-hundred and eighteen non-treatment seeking smokers completed a single laboratory session during which they viewed sets of PSAs differentiated by presence of smoking cues (central to the PSA's argument, peripheral, or no cues) and argument strength (high versus low). After viewing the PSAs, participants completed self-report measures of smoking urges, attitudes toward quitting, self-efficacy, and intentions to quit smoking. Smoking behavior was recorded during a 1-h ad libitum smoking period immediately following PSA viewing and assessment.
RESULTS: There was a significant positive effect of argument strength on attitudes toward quitting smoking (p=0.012). There were no main effects of smoking cues or smoking cue by argument strength interactions on any of the outcome measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Visual smoking cues in PSAs do not increase urges to smoke, nor is there evidence that the inclusion of such cues impedes the recall or persuasive effects of anti-smoking arguments.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health communication; Public service announcements; Smoking; Smoking cues; Tobacco

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23742844      PMCID: PMC3786034          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings.

Authors:  L S Cox; S T Tiffany; A G Christen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research.

Authors:  B L Carter; S T Tiffany
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  The effectiveness of gateway communications in anti-marijuana campaigns.

Authors:  Marco C Yzer; Joseph N Cappella; Martin Fishbein; Robert Hornik; R Kirkland Ahern
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

4.  Attentional and evaluative biases for smoking cues in nicotine dependence: component processes of biases in visual orienting.

Authors:  B Bradley; M Field; K Mogg; J De Houwer
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.293

5.  Impact of tobacco control policies and mass media campaigns on monthly adult smoking prevalence.

Authors:  Melanie A Wakefield; Sarah Durkin; Matthew J Spittal; Mohammad Siahpush; Michelle Scollo; Julie A Simpson; Simon Chapman; Victoria White; David Hill
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The theory of planned behavior and smoking cessation.

Authors:  P Norman; M Conner; R Bell
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength: Reliability and Validity.

Authors:  Xiaoquan Zhao; Andrew Strasser; Joseph N Cappella; Caryn Lerman; Martin Fishbein
Journal:  Commun Methods Meas       Date:  2011-03-04

8.  Graphic warning labels in cigarette advertisements: recall and viewing patterns.

Authors:  Andrew A Strasser; Kathy Z Tang; Daniel Romer; Christopher Jepson; Joseph N Cappella
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Attentional shifts to smoking cues in smokers.

Authors:  Andrew J Waters; Saul Shiffman; Brendan P Bradley; Karin Mogg
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  Influence of smoking cues in movies on craving among smokers.

Authors:  Kirsten Lochbuehler; Rutger C M E Engels; Ron H J Scholte
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.526

View more
  7 in total

1.  Effects of exposure to anti-vaping public service announcements among current smokers and dual users of cigarettes and electronic nicotine delivery systems.

Authors:  Andy S L Tan; Vaughan W Rees; Justin Rodgers; Emeka Agudile; Natasha A Sokol; Kyeungyeun Yie; Ashley Sanders-Jackson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Awareness of FDA-mandated cigarette packaging changes among smokers of 'light' cigarettes.

Authors:  M Falcone; M Bansal-Travers; P M Sanborn; K Z Tang; A A Strasser
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2014-12-08

3.  Do current and former cigarette smokers have an attentional bias for e-cigarette cues?

Authors:  Kirsten Lochbuehler; E Paul Wileyto; Kathy Z Tang; Melissa Mercincavage; Joseph N Cappella; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 4.153

4.  How Are Information Seeking, Scanning, and Processing Related to Beliefs About the Roles of Genetics and Behavior in Cancer Causation?

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Courtney Wheeler; Jada G Hamilton
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016-09-23

5.  Positive and instructive anti-smoking messages speak to older smokers: a focus group study.

Authors:  Janine K Cataldo; Mary Hunter; Anne Berit Petersen; Nicolas Sheon
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 2.600

6.  Alcohol harm reduction advertisements: a content analysis of topic, objective, emotional tone, execution and target audience.

Authors:  Kimberley Dunstone; Emily Brennan; Michael D Slater; Helen G Dixon; Sarah J Durkin; Simone Pettigrew; Melanie A Wakefield
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Content analysis of tobacco content in UK television.

Authors:  Alexander B Barker; Kathy Whittamore; John Britton; Jo Cranwell
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 7.552

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.