Literature DB >> 23742197

Evaluation of the use of digital study models in postgraduate orthodontic programs in the United States and Canada.

Shruti Shastry1, Jae Hyun Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the extent, experience, and trends associated with digital model use, as well as the advantages of using a particular study model type (digital or plaster) in postgraduate orthodontic programs in the United States and Canada.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic survey consisting of 14 questions was sent to 72 program directors or chairpersons of accredited orthodontic postgraduate programs in the United States and Canada.
RESULTS: Fifty-one responded for a 71% response rate. Sixty-five percent of the schools use plaster study models compared with 35% that use digital models. The most common advantages of plaster models were a three-dimensional feel and the ability for them to be mounted on an articulator. The most common advantages of digital models were the ease of storage and retrieval, and the residents' exposure to new technology. About one third of the plaster model users reported that they wanted to switch to digital models in the future, with 12% planning to do so within 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our study, 35% of accredited orthodontic postgraduate programs in the United States and Canada are using digital study models in most cases treated in their programs, and the trend is for increased digital model use in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23742197      PMCID: PMC8683047          DOI: 10.2319/030813-197.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  24 in total

1.  Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models.

Authors:  A Bell; A F Ayoub; P Siebert
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2003-09

2.  Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity.

Authors:  K Bootvong; Z Liu; C McGrath; U Hägg; Ricky W K Wong; M Bendeus; S Yeung
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.

Authors:  Troy R Okunami; Budi Kusnoto; Ellen BeGole; Carla A Evans; Cyril Sadowsky; Shahrbanoo Fadavi
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models.

Authors:  Roy W Goonewardene; Mithran S Goonewardene; John M Razza; Kevin Murray
Journal:  Aust Orthod J       Date:  2008-11

5.  Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.

Authors:  Michael F Leifert; Melvyn M Leifert; Stella S Efstratiadis; Thomas J Cangialosi
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study.

Authors:  Anne Margreet R Cuperus; Marit C Harms; Frits A Rangel; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Jan G J H Schols; K Hero Breuning
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements.

Authors:  Marinês Vieira S Sousa; Eliziane Cossetin Vasconcelos; Guilherme Janson; Daniela Garib; Arnaldo Pinzan
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.

Authors:  Peter A Costalos; Keivan Sarraf; Thomas J Cangialosi; Stella Efstratiadis
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility.

Authors:  Michel Dalstra; Birte Melsen
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2009-03

Review 10.  Linear measurements using virtual study models.

Authors:  Nghe S Luu; Liliya G Nikolcheva; Jean-Marc Retrouvey; Carlos Flores-Mir; Tarek El-Bialy; Jason P Carey; Paul W Major
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy and reproducibility of dental measurements on tomographic digital models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jamille B Ferreira; Ilana O Christovam; David S Alencar; Andréa F J da Motta; Claudia T Mattos; Adriana Cury-Saramago
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Correlation and agreement of a digital and conventional method to measure arch parameters.

Authors:  Nes Nawi; Alizae Marny Mohamed; Murshida Marizan Nor; Nor Atika Ashar
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 3.  Variation of orthodontic treatment decision-making based on dental model type: A systematic review.

Authors:  Camila Pachêco-Pereira; Graziela De Luca Canto; Paul W Major; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Are there differences between comparison methods used to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of digital models?

Authors:  Leonardo Tavares Camardella; Hero Breuning; Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017-02

5.  Comparative study of the usability of two software programs for visualization and analysis of digital orthodontic models.

Authors:  Matheus Felter; Milena Moraes de Oliveira Lenza; Maurício Guilherme Lenza; Wendel Minoro Muniz Shibazaki; Rhonan Ferreira Silva
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2018-09-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.