OBJECTIVE: To determine in which clinical scenarios digital models are valid as replacements for plaster models during orthodontic treatment decision-making process and treatment planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An attempt to identify all pertinent published information was made. Retained articles were those where a decision-making process leading to differential orthodontic treatment plans based on either method were compared. The search was tailored for PubMed and adapted for EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, LILACS, and Web of Science. A partial grey literature search was conducted through Google Scholar. References lists of the included articles were screened for potential relevant studies. The methodology of selected studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS). RESULTS: Only two studies were finally selected for the qualitative and quantitative synthesis. QUADAS results scores from selected studies ranged from 61% to 83% of 11 items evaluated. In one, the overall treatment plan regarding orthognathic surgery for Class II malocclusion changed in 13% to 22% of the cases. In the other one, 6% of the orthodontic treatment plans changed. CONCLUSION: Digital models could be used to replace plaster models in Class II malocclusion treatment planning.
OBJECTIVE: To determine in which clinical scenarios digital models are valid as replacements for plaster models during orthodontic treatment decision-making process and treatment planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An attempt to identify all pertinent published information was made. Retained articles were those where a decision-making process leading to differential orthodontic treatment plans based on either method were compared. The search was tailored for PubMed and adapted for EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, LILACS, and Web of Science. A partial grey literature search was conducted through Google Scholar. References lists of the included articles were screened for potential relevant studies. The methodology of selected studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS). RESULTS: Only two studies were finally selected for the qualitative and quantitative synthesis. QUADAS results scores from selected studies ranged from 61% to 83% of 11 items evaluated. In one, the overall treatment plan regarding orthognathic surgery for Class II malocclusion changed in 13% to 22% of the cases. In the other one, 6% of the orthodontic treatment plans changed. CONCLUSION: Digital models could be used to replace plaster models in Class II malocclusion treatment planning.
Entities:
Keywords:
Decision making; Digital models; Orthodontics; Plaster models; Review
Authors: William Hollingworth; L Santiago Medina; Robert E Lenkinski; Dean K Shibata; Byron Bernal; David Zurakowski; Bryan Comstock; Jeffrey G Jarvik Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: A J Ireland; C McNamara; M J Clover; K House; N Wenger; M E Barbour; K Alemzadeh; L Zhang; J R Sandy Journal: Br Dent J Date: 2008-10-11 Impact factor: 1.626
Authors: Joshua L Whetten; Philip C Williamson; Giseon Heo; Connie Varnhagen; Paul W Major Journal: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Jamille B Ferreira; Ilana O Christovam; David S Alencar; Andréa F J da Motta; Claudia T Mattos; Adriana Cury-Saramago Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 2.419