| Literature DB >> 23742181 |
Hassan Momtaz1, Farhad Safarpoor Dehkordi, Ebrahim Rahimi, Amin Asgarifar.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The quality of drinking water has an important role in human infection and disease. This study was aimed at comparing polymerase chain reaction and culture in detecting Escherichia coli, Salmonella species and Vibrio cholera in tape water and bottled drinking water in various seasons in Isfahan province, Iran.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23742181 PMCID: PMC3703282 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-556
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Distribution of , spp., and tap-water and bottled mineral water-positive samples from Isfahan province, Iran
| | | |
|---|---|---|
| | Western Isfahan (n = 36) | 10 |
| 2 | ||
| - | ||
| Central Isfahan (n = 36) | 2 | |
| 1 | ||
| - | ||
| Northern Isfahan (n = 36) | 10 | |
| - | ||
| - | ||
| | Southern Isfahan (n = 36) | 16 |
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| | Total (n = 144) | 38 (26.38%) |
| 5 (3.47%) | ||
| 3 (2.08%) | ||
| Company 1 (n = 56) | - | |
| - | ||
| - | ||
| Company 2 (n = 61) | 3 | |
| - | ||
| - | ||
| | Company 3 (n = 46) | - |
| - | ||
| - | ||
| | Company 4 (n = 42) | - |
| - | ||
| - | ||
| | Company 5 (n = 69) | 5 |
| - | ||
| - | ||
| | Total (n = 304) | 8 (2.63%) |
| - | ||
| - | ||
| Total (n = 448) | 46 (10.26%) | |
| 5 (1.11%) | ||
| 3 (0.66%) |
*Number of positive samples.
Distribution of , spp., and tap-water and bottled mineral water-positive samples from Isfahan province, Iran in different seasons
| | Western Isfahan (n = 36) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 12 (33.33%) |
| Central Isfahan (n = 36) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 (8.33%) | |
| Northern Isfahan (n = 36) | 7 | 1 | 2 | 10 (27.77%) | |
| | Southern Isfahan (n = 36) | 10 | 8 | 3 | 21 58.33%) |
| | Total (n = 144) | 27 | 14 | 5 | 46 (31.94%) |
| Company 1 (n = 56) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0%) | |
| Company 2 (n = 61) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 (4.91%) | |
| | Company 3 (n = 46) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0%) |
| | Company 4 (n = 42) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0%) |
| | Company 5 (n = 69) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 (7.24%) |
| | Total (n = 304) | 4 | 3 | 1 | 8 (2.63%) |
| Total (n = 448) | 31 (6.91%) | 17 (3.79%) | 6 (1.33%) | 54 (12.05%) |
*Number of positive samples.
Study the sensitivity and specificity of PCR method for detection of
| PCR positive | 34*a) | 4 c) | 38 |
| PCR Negative | 0 b) | 410**d) | 410 |
| Total | 34 a+b) | 414 c+d) | 448 |
*Sensitivity = = 100%.
**Specificity = = 99%.
Study the sensitivity and specificity of PCR method for detection of
| PCR positive | 4*a) | 1 c) | 5 |
| PCR Negative | 0 b) | 443**d) | 443 |
| Total | 4 a+b) | 444 c+d) | 448 |
*Sensitivity = = 100%.
**Specificity = = 99.7%.
Study the sensitivity and specificity of PCR method for detection of
| PCR positive | 3*a) | 0c) | 3 |
| PCR Negative | 0b) | 445**d) | 445 |
| Total | 3a+b) | 445c+d) | 448 |
*Sensitivity = = 100%.
**Specificity = = 100%.