Literature DB >> 23741931

Levels of Cr, Co, Ni and Mo in erythrocytes, serum and urine after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

F Mazoochian1, F Schmidutz, J Kiefl, A Fottner, B Michalke, R Schierl, P Thomas, V Jansson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hip resurfacing arthroplasty is known to increase the metal ion concentration in the serum, urine and whole blood, with potentially adverse effects on the organism. However, only few data are available about the metal ion concentrations in erythrocytes, although they are directly exposed to the higher concentrations of the serum.
METHODS: The ion levels of chromium, cobalt, nickel and molybdenum in erythrocytes of 25 patients with a hip resurfacing implant were analysed with high resolution ICP-sf-MS (inductively-coupled-plasma-sector-field-mass-spectrometry). The results were compared to the ion levels in the serum and urine of the patients, and also to the ion levels of 27 control persons without an implant.
RESULTS: Compared to the control group, ion levels in the erythrocytes of the hip resurfacing group were markedly increased for cobalt (0.10 vs. 3.26 microg/kg) and slightly for chromium (6.04 vs. 7.38 microg/kg). In contrast, ion levels in the serum of the hip resurfacing group were increased for cobalt (0.21 vs. 1.92 microg/l), chromium (1.48 vs. 5.64 microg/l), nickel (1.53 vs. 4.25 microg/l) and molybdenum (2.17 vs. 3.78 microg/l).
CONCLUSION: Ion concentrations of cobalt and chromium are also increased in erythrocytes after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Further research is required to evaluate the impact of the elevated ion levels on the erythrocytes, and to evaluate if metal ions also accumulate in other tissues of the body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23741931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Chir Belg        ISSN: 0001-5458            Impact factor:   1.090


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Should metal alloy discs be used for patch testing in suspected metal implant intolerance reaction?].

Authors:  P Thomas; J Geier; H Dickel; T Diepgen; U Hillen; B Kreft; A Schnuch; C Szliska; V Mahler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Characteristics of 200 patients with suspected implant allergy compared to 100 symptom-free arthroplasty patients].

Authors:  P Thomas; K Stauner; A Schraml; V Mahler; I J Banke; H Gollwitzer; R Burgkart; P M Prodinger; S Schneider; M Pritschet; F Mazoochian; C Schopf; A Steinmann; B Summer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Patients with intolerance reactions to total knee replacement: combined assessment of allergy diagnostics, periprosthetic histology, and peri-implant cytokine expression pattern.

Authors:  Peter Thomas; Christine von der Helm; Christoph Schopf; Farhad Mazoochian; Lars Frommelt; Hans Gollwitzer; Josef Schneider; Michael Flaig; Veit Krenn; Benjamin Thomas; Burkhard Summer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Clinical and diagnostic challenges of metal implant allergy using the example of orthopaedic surgical implants: Part 15 of the Series Molecular Allergology.

Authors:  Peter Thomas
Journal:  Allergo J Int       Date:  2014-09-29

5.  Is the synovial fluid cobalt-to-chromium ratio related to the serum partitioning of metal debris following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  D J Langton; S Natu; C F Harrington; J G Bowsher; A V F Nargol
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 5.853

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.