Literature DB >> 2374188

In situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi.

N Rodrigues Netto Júnior1, G C Lemos, J F Claro.   

Abstract

We reviewed our experience with in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones in 30 patients. The Siemens Lithostar unit was used for stone disintegration and no attempts were made to manipulate the calculi back into the kidney. During the study period 15 patients presented with upper, 9 with mid and 6 with lower ureteral calculi. The mean stone size was 5 x 12 mm. The success rates in stone removal, hospitalization, anesthesia, average number of shocks and kilovolts used were analyzed. Complete removal of all calculous material was obtained in 86.6% of the patients after 3 months. Followup consisted of a plain film of the kidneys, ureters and bladder, and eventually renal ultrasound 1 day and 1 to 3 months postoperatively. Routinely, patients were treated without hospitalization, while 3 had persistent stone fragments and required hospitalization for auxiliary endourological procedures. The average hospital stay for these patients was 1.6 days. Of the 30 patients 13 (43.4%) were treated without anesthesia, 9 (30.0%) received intravenous sedation and 8 (26.6%) had epidural anesthesia. Patients received 3,000 to 6,000 shock waves per session (median 4,000) at 14.0 to 19.0 kv. (median 18.1 kv.), and in 76.9% the treatment was completed after 1 session. Patients who needed more than 1 session received 3,000 to 4,000 shock waves (median 3,000) at 15.0 to 19.0 kv. (median 17.8 kv.) per additional session. Minor complications, such as hematuria, were observed in 33.3% of the patients for less than 24 hours. A small erythematous area usually was present on the abdominal wall at the shock wave entrance site and temporary ileus was noted in 2 patients. In situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with the Siemens Lithostar device is an effective method for treatment of ureteral stones in all parts of the ureter due to the ease of patient positioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2374188     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39425-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

1.  In situ prone ESWL for the treatment of lower ureteral stones: experience with 28 patients.

Authors:  I Başar; T Gürpinar; A Erkan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  In situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones: experience with 65 patients.

Authors:  I Başar; T Gürpinar; A Erkan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-05-29

4.  Assessing the efficiency of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for stones in renal units with impaired function: a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  Anand Srivastava; Tapan Sinha; S C Karan; A S Sandhu; S K Gupta; G S Sethi; R Talwar; V Narang; N Adlakha; A Agarwal
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-02-15

5.  Push and smash increases success rates in treatment of ureteric calculi by ESWL.

Authors:  A J Gross; A Kugler; F Seseke; R H Ringert
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Stimulation of the obturator nerve during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  C Deliveliotis; D Picramenos; C Kiriakakis; P Kiriazis; K Alexopoulou; A Kostakopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  ESWL in situ or ureteroscopy for ureteric stones?

Authors:  J Hofbauer; C Tuerk; K Höbarth; R Hasun; M Marberger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Experience in 3,500 patients with urinary stones treated with the Dornier HM-4 bath-free lithotriptor.

Authors:  A Kostakopoulos; N I Stavropoulos; G Louras; C Deliveliotis; C Dimopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Shock wave lithotripsy as a primary modality for treating upper ureteric stones: A 10-year experience.

Authors:  Abhijit S Padhye; Pushkaraj B Yadav; Pratikshit M Mahajan; Ashish A Bhave; Yogesh B Kshirsagar; Yogesh B Sovani; Shivadeo S Bapat
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10

10.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower ureteric stones: Outcome and criteria for success.

Authors:  Mohammad Abdelghany; Tarek Zaher; Rafik El Halaby; Tarek Osman
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2011-05-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.