Literature DB >> 23741046

Skill learning involves optimizing the linking of action phases.

Daniel Säfström1, J Randall Flanagan, Roland S Johansson.   

Abstract

Many manual tasks involve object manipulation and are achieved by an evolving series of actions, or action phases, recruited to achieve task subgoals. The ability to effectively link action phases is an important component of manual dexterity. However, our understanding of how the effective linking of sequential action phases develops with skill learning is limited. Here, we addressed this issue using a task in which participants applied forces to a handle to move a cursor on a computer screen to successively acquire visual targets. Target acquisition required actively holding the cursor within the target zone (hold phase) for a required duration before moving to the next target (transport phase). If the transport phase was initiated prematurely, before the end of the required hold duration, participants had to return to the target to acquire it. The goal was to acquire targets as quickly as possible. Distinct visual and auditory sensory events marked goal completion of each action phase. During initial task performance, the transport phase was reactively triggered by sensory events signaling hold phase completion. However, with practice, participants learned to initiate the transport phase based on a prediction of the time of hold phase completion. Simulations revealed that participants learned to near-optimally compensate for temporal uncertainty, presumably related to estimation of time intervals and execution of motor commands, so as to reduce the average latency between the end of the required hold phase duration and the start of the transport phase, while avoiding an excess of premature exits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  motor learning; multisensory; object manipulation; optimality; sensorimotor control

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23741046     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00019.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  5 in total

Review 1.  Computations underlying sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Planning Ahead: Object-Directed Sequential Actions Decoded from Human Frontoparietal and Occipitotemporal Networks.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Ingrid S Johnsrude; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Electrifying the motor engram: effects of tDCS on motor learning and control.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Rapid target foraging with reach or gaze: The hand looks further ahead than the eye.

Authors:  Jonathan S Diamond; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Effects of Motor Training on Accuracy and Precision of Jaw and Finger Movements.

Authors:  Yinan Chen; Song Wu; Zhengting Tang; Jinglu Zhang; Lin Wang; Linfeng Yu; Kelun Wang; Peter Svensson
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.599

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.