Literature DB >> 23741044

Effective intracortical microstimulation parameters applied to primary motor cortex for evoking forelimb movements to stable spatial end points.

Gustaf M Van Acker1, Sommer L Amundsen, William G Messamore, Hongyu Y Zhang, Carl W Luchies, Anthony Kovac, Paul D Cheney.   

Abstract

High-frequency, long-duration intracortical microstimulation (HFLD-ICMS) applied to motor cortex is recognized as a useful and informative method for corticomotor mapping by evoking natural-appearing movements of the limb to consistent stable end-point positions. An important feature of these movements is that stimulation of a specific site in motor cortex evokes movement to the same spatial end point regardless of the starting position of the limb. The goal of this study was to delineate effective stimulus parameters for evoking forelimb movements to stable spatial end points from HFLD-ICMS applied to primary motor cortex (M1) in awake monkeys. We investigated stimulation of M1 as combinations of frequency (30-400 Hz), amplitude (30-200 μA), and duration (0.5-2 s) while concurrently recording electromyographic (EMG) activity from 24 forelimb muscles and movement kinematics with a motion capture system. Our results suggest a range of parameters (80-140 Hz, 80-140 μA, and 1,000-ms train duration) that are effective and safe for evoking forelimb translocation with subsequent stabilization at a spatial end point. The mean time for stimulation to elicit successful movement of the forelimb to a stable spatial end point was 475.8 ± 170.9 ms. Median successful frequency and amplitude were 110 Hz and 110 μA, respectively. Attenuated parameters resulted in inconsistent, truncated, or undetectable movements, while intensified parameters yielded no change to movement end points and increased potential for large-scale physiological spread and adverse focal motor effects. Establishing cortical stimulation parameters yielding consistent forelimb movements to stable spatial end points forms the basis for a systematic and comprehensive mapping of M1 in terms of evoked movements and associated muscle synergies. Additionally, the results increase our understanding of how the central nervous system may encode movement.

Keywords:  EMG; forelimb; motor control; primary motor cortex; primate; stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23741044      PMCID: PMC3763095          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00172.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  28 in total

1.  Optimal parameters for microstimulation derived forelimb movement thresholds and motor maps in rats and mice.

Authors:  Nicole A Young; Jennifer Vuong; Corey Flynn; G Campbell Teskey
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 2.  High-frequency stimulation in Parkinson's disease: more or less?

Authors:  Liliana Garcia; Giampaolo D'Alessandro; Bernard Bioulac; Constance Hammond
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Arm movements evoked by electrical stimulation in the motor cortex of monkeys.

Authors:  Michael S A Graziano; Tyson N S Aflalo; Dylan F Cooke
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Direct and indirect activation of cortical neurons by electrical microstimulation.

Authors:  E J Tehovnik; A S Tolias; F Sultan; W M Slocum; N K Logothetis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Linear summation of cat motor cortex outputs.

Authors:  Christian Ethier; Laurent Brizzi; Warren G Darling; Charles Capaday
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Muscle representation in the macaque motor cortex: an anatomical perspective.

Authors:  Jean-Alban Rathelot; Peter L Strick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Motion estimation using point cluster method and Kalman filter.

Authors:  M Senesh; A Wolf
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Synaptic linkages between corticomotoneuronal cells affecting forelimb muscles in behaving primates.

Authors:  W S Smith; E E Fetz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Neural mechanism of activity spread in the cat motor cortex and its relation to the intrinsic connectivity.

Authors:  Charles Capaday; Carl van Vreeswijk; Christian Ethier; Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg; Doug Weber
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Hijacking cortical motor output with repetitive microstimulation.

Authors:  Darcy M Griffin; Heather M Hudson; Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf; Paul D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  What single-cell stimulation has told us about neural coding.

Authors:  Guy Doron; Michael Brecht
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Equilibrium-based movement endpoints elicited from primary motor cortex using repetitive microstimulation.

Authors:  Gustaf M Van Acker; Sommer L Amundsen; William G Messamore; Hongyu Y Zhang; Carl W Luchies; Paul D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Muscle synergies obtained from comprehensive mapping of the primary motor cortex forelimb representation using high-frequency, long-duration ICMS.

Authors:  Sommer L Amundsen Huffmaster; Gustaf M Van Acker; Carl W Luchies; Paul D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Intracortical Microstimulation Maps of Motor, Somatosensory, and Posterior Parietal Cortex in Tree Shrews (Tupaia belangeri) Reveal Complex Movement Representations.

Authors:  Mary K L Baldwin; Dylan F Cooke; Leah Krubitzer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  EMG activation patterns associated with high frequency, long-duration intracortical microstimulation of primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Darcy M Griffin; Heather M Hudson; Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf; Paul D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Muscle Synergies Obtained from Comprehensive Mapping of the Cortical Forelimb Representation Using Stimulus Triggered Averaging of EMG Activity.

Authors:  Sommer L Amundsen Huffmaster; Gustaf M Van Acker; Carl W Luchies; Paul D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Muscle synergies evoked by microstimulation are preferentially encoded during behavior.

Authors:  Simon A Overduin; Andrea d'Avella; Jose M Carmena; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Restoring Behavior via Inverse Neurocontroller in a Lesioned Cortical Spiking Model Driving a Virtual Arm.

Authors:  Salvador Dura-Bernal; Kan Li; Samuel A Neymotin; Joseph T Francis; Jose C Principe; William W Lytton
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  A Donders' Like Law for Arm Movements: The Signal not the Noise.

Authors:  Steven Ewart; Stephanie M Hynes; Warren G Darling; Charles Capaday
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The Duration of Motor Responses Evoked with Intracortical Microstimulation in Rats Is Primarily Modulated by Stimulus Amplitude and Train Duration.

Authors:  Meghan Watson; Mohamad Sawan; Numa Dancause
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.