Literature DB >> 23739787

Marginal microleakage of class V resin-based composite restorations bonded with six one-step self-etch systems.

Alfonso Sánchez-Ayala1, Arcelino Farias-Neto, Larissa Soares Reis Vilanova, João Carlos Gomes, Osnara Maria Mongruel Gomes.   

Abstract

This study compared the microleakage of class V restorations bonded with various one-step self-etching adhesives. Seventy class V resin-based composite restorations were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of 35 premolars, by using: Clearfil S3 Bond, G-Bond, iBond, One Coat 7.0, OptiBond All-In-One, or Xeno IV. The Adper Single Bond etch-and-rinse two-step adhesive was employed as a control. Specimens were thermocycled for 500 cycles in separate water baths at 5°C and 55°C and loaded under 40 to 70 N for 50,000 cycles. Marginal microleakage was measured based on the penetration of a tracer agent. Although the control showed no microleakage at the enamel margins, there were no differences between groups (p = 0.06). None of the adhesives avoided microleakage at the dentin margins, and they displayed similar performances (p = 0.76). When both margins were compared, iBond® presented higher microleakage (p < 0.05) at the enamel margins (median, 1.00; Q3-Q1, 1.25-0.00) compared to the dentin margins (median, 0.00; Q3-Q1, 0.25-0.00). The study adhesives showed similar abilities to seal the margins of class V restorations, except for iBond®, which presented lower performance at the enamel margin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23739787     DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242013000300003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Oral Res        ISSN: 1806-8324


  5 in total

1.  Effect of Diode Laser (810 nm) Irradiation on Marginal Microleakage of Multi-mode Adhesive Resins in Class V Composite Restorations.

Authors:  Niusha Golbari; Shahin Kasraei; Anahit Afrasiabi; Elahe Mostajir; Seyed Masoud Mojahedi
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-01

2.  Microleakage of two self-adhesive cements in the enamel and dentin after 24 hours and two months.

Authors:  Zahra Jaberi Ansari; Mojdeh Kalantar Motamedi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-07-31

3.  Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Flowable Composite Resin Using Etch and Rinse, Self-Etch Adhesive Systems, and Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities: Confocal Laser Microscopic Study.

Authors:  Ekta Varma Sengar; Sanjyot Mulay; Lotika Beri; Archana Gupta; Thamer Almohareb; Sultan Binalrimal; Ali Robaian; Maha A Bahammam; Hammam Ahmed Bahammam; Sarah Ahmed Bahammam; Bassam Zidane; Nassreen H Albar; Shilpa Bhandi; Deepti Shrivastava; Kumar Chandan Srivastava; Shankargouda Patil
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Evaluation of Nanoleakage Depth and Pattern of Cervical Restorations Bonded with Different Adhesive Systems.

Authors:  Niveditha Bhupanapadu; Mohammed A Sattar; Arpita Deb
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2022 May-Jun

5.  The effect of surface sealants with different filler content on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Ozge Kam Hepdeniz; Ugur Burak Temel; Muhittin Ugurlu; Ozgur Koskan
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.