Literature DB >> 23739337

Workers' compensation claims for musculoskeletal disorders among wholesale and retail trade industry workers--Ohio, 2005-2009.

.   

Abstract

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) resulting from ergonomic hazards are common in the United States. Recent data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) indicate that in 2011, one third of occupational injuries and illnesses resulting in lost time from work were WMSDs. Based on data from the 2010 BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses, a higher rate of WMSDs resulting in lost time from work occurred in the Wholesale and Retail Trade (WRT) industry compared with most other industries. To assess trends and identify WRT subsectors and subgroups associated with high rates of WMSD workers' compensation claims, the Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation (OBWC) and CDC analyzed OBWC claims data for single-location WRT employers in Ohio for the period 2005-2009. From 2005 to 2009, the rate of WMSD claims declined from 86.3 to 52.8 per 10,000 employees. The three WRT industry subsectors with the highest rates of WMSD claims were Merchant Wholesalers, Nondurable Goods; Furniture and Home Furnishings Stores; and Merchant Wholesalers, Durable Goods. Within those three WRT subsectors, the highest rates of WMSD claims were noted in five subgroups: furniture stores and wholesalers of alcoholic beverages, groceries and related products, metal and minerals, and motor vehicle parts. Providing recommendations for WMSD prevention is particularly important for these WRT subgroups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23739337      PMCID: PMC4604982     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) resulting from ergonomic hazards are common in the United States. Recent data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) indicate that in 2011, one third of occupational injuries and illnesses resulting in lost time from work were WMSDs (1). Based on data from the 2010 BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses, a higher rate of WMSDs resulting in lost time from work occurred in the Wholesale and Retail Trade (WRT) industry compared with most other industries (2). To assess trends and identify WRT subsectors and subgroups associated with high rates of WMSD workers’ compensation claims, the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (OBWC) and CDC analyzed OBWC claims data for single-location WRT employers in Ohio for the period 2005–2009. From 2005 to 2009, the rate of WMSD claims declined from 86.3 to 52.8 per 10,000 employees. The three WRT industry subsectors with the highest rates of WMSD claims were Merchant Wholesalers, Nondurable Goods; Furniture and Home Furnishings Stores; and Merchant Wholesalers, Durable Goods. Within those three WRT subsectors, the highest rates of WMSD claims were noted in five subgroups: furniture stores and wholesalers of alcoholic beverages, groceries and related products, metal and minerals, and motor vehicle parts. Providing recommendations for WMSD prevention is particularly important for these WRT subgroups. OBWC is the largest of four state-run workers’ compensation systems in the United States where the state is the sole provider of workers’ compensation insurance.* Data for OBWC-insured, single-location† employers in the WRT industry were used for this report; subsectors and subsector groups were categorized according to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). With few exceptions, WMSD claims were defined according to BLS case definitions.§ Coded injury/illness diagnosis data and narrative text on causation were used to identify WMSD claims; a Bayesian auto-coding technique (3) used both data elements to identify WMSDs by using a “training” and “testing” set of manually coded claims. The sensitivity and specificity of this auto-coding technique when applied to a test set were 0.90 and 0.98, respectively. Auto-coded WMSD claims were flagged for manual, expert review when the injury/illness diagnosis was not a WMSD. Lost-time claims for WMSDs were defined as claims resulting in more than 7 days away from work. To calculate incidence rates, OBWC claims data were linked with denominator data (number of employees) from the Ohio Department of Jobs and Family Services by federal employer identification numbers. Trends in rates were tested using Poisson regression analysis. Disallowed and dismissed claims were excluded from all analyses. In 2009, CDC identified 31,599 OBWC-insured, single-location employers in the WRT industry, employing at least 289,441 workers. Of those identified WRT employers, 13,930 (44%) were in the wholesale category of the industry. The proportion of all claims attributable to WMSDs was relatively stable at approximately 20% throughout 2005–2009; the proportion of WMSD lost-time claims decreased from 37.4% in 2005 to 31.8% in 2009 (p<0.05) (Table 1). During 2005–2009, the majority of claimants were men aged 25–54 years, who worked for employers with 11–249 employees. The greatest number of WMSD claims occurred in the WRT subsector Merchant Wholesalers, Durable Goods (Table 1).
TABLE 1

Number and percentage of WRT musculoskeletal disorder workers’ compensation claims, by claim status, age group, sex, single-location–employer size, and WRT NAICS code — Ohio, 2005, 2007, and 2009

Characteristic200520072009



TotalLTTotalLTTotalLT






No.(%)No.(%)No.(%)No.(%)No.(%)No.(%)
WRT NAICS total 3,019 (21.6) 1,006 (37.4) 2,407 (21.1) 709 (33.8) 1,552 (20.3) 413 (31.8)
Age group (yrs)
 14–177(0.2)00.012(0.5)2(0.3)4(0.3)00.0
 18–1978(2.6)19(1.9)40(1.7)6(0.8)19(1.2)2(0.5)
 20–24313(10.4)66(6.6)250(10.4)41(5.8)137(8.8)21(5.1)
 25–34787(26.1)215(21.4)600(24.9)150(21.2)368(23.7)71(17.2)
 35–44880(29.1)297(29.5)706(29.3)223(31.5)420(27.1)113(27.4)
 45–54685(22.7)283(28.1)544(22.6)190(26.8)391(25.2)131(31.7)
 55–64244(8.1)116(11.5)229(9.5)89(12.6)199(12.8)69(16.7)
 ≥6524(0.8)9(0.9)26(1.1)8(1.1)14(0.9)6(1.5)
 Unknown1(0.0)1(0.1)0(0.0)0(0.0)0(0.0)0(0.0)
Sex
 Female604(20.0)196(19.5)461(19.2)119(16.8)309(19.9)69(16.7)
 Male2392(79.2)809(80.4)1919(79.7)589(83.1)1233(79.4)343(83.1)
 Unknown23(0.8)1(0.1)27(1.1)1(0.1)10(0.6)1(0.2)
Employer size (no. of employees)
 1–10418(13.8)164(16.3)325(13.5)113(15.9)242(15.6)93(22.5)
 11–491104(36.6)373(37.1)838(34.8)258(36.4)508(32.7)132(32.0)
 50–2491251(41.4)378(37.6)1044(43.4)277(39.1)642(41.4)142(34.4)
 ≥250237(7.9)86(8.5)192(8.0)58(8.2)137(8.8)41(9.9)
 Unknown9(0.3)5(0.5)8(0.3)3(0.4)23(1.5)5(1.2)
WRT NAICS code
 423 Merchant Wholesalers, Durable Goods1008(33.4)333(33.1)787(32.7)221(31.2)463(29.8)115(27.8)
 424 Merchant Wholesalers, Nondurable Goods559(18.5)207(20.6)468(19.4)137(19.3)376(24.2)101(24.5)
 425 Wholesale Electronic Markets and Agents and Brokers119(3.9)31(3.1)101(4.2)19(2.7)76(4.9)20(4.8)
 441 Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers367(12.2)122(12.1)327(13.6)106(15.0)222(14.3)68(16.5)
 442 Furniture and Home Furnishings Stores144(4.8)50(5.0)101(4.2)27(3.8)50(3.2)16(3.9)
 443 Electronics and Appliance Stores46(1.5)10(1.0)29(1.2)7(1.0)26(1.7)4(1.0)
 444 Building Material and Garden Equipment and Supplies Dealers220(7.3)69(6.9)155(6.4)54(7.6)81(5.2)20(4.8)
 445 Food and Beverage Stores226(7.5)79(7.9)182(7.6)63(8.9)104(6.7)30(7.3)
 446 Health and Personal Care Stores18(0.6)5(0.5)14(0.6)4(0.6)18(1.2)3(0.7)
 447 Gasoline Stations52(1.7)17(1.7)44(1.8)18(2.5)30(1.9)12(2.9)
 448 Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores48(1.6)14(1.4)38(1.6)9(1.3)19(1.2)4(1.0)
 451 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, and Music Stores31(1.0)8(0.8)20(0.8)4(0.6)14(0.9)3(0.7)
 452 General Merchandise Stores6(0.2)3(0.3)14(0.6)3(0.4)9(0.6)2(0.5)
 453 Miscellaneous Store Retailers80(2.6)22(2.2)60(2.5)18(2.5)26(1.7)6(1.5)
 454 Nonstore Retailers95(3.1)36(3.6)67(2.8)19(2.7)38(2.4)9(2.2)

Abbreviations: WRT = wholesale retail trade; NAICS = North American Industry Classification System; LT = lost-time claims (excluding claims for which the size of the employer was unknown).

The rate of WMSDs resulting in a claim or a lost-time claim decreased significantly from 2005 to 2009 for WRT industry employers overall but not for all WRT subsectors. Overall in the WRT industry, the respective rates of WMSD claims and lost-time WMSD claims per 10,000 employees decreased from 86.3 and 28.7 in 2005 to 52.8 and 14.1 in 2009 (Table 2). Employers with more employees tended to have higher rates of total and lost-time WMSD claims. During 2005–2009, lost-time WMSD claim rates per 10,000 employees for three WRT subsectors were among the highest five each year: Merchant Wholesalers, Nondurable Goods (29.2 in 2009); Furniture and Home Furnishings Stores (21.7); and Merchant Wholesalers, Durable Goods (15.5) (Figure, Table 2). The high lost-time WMSD rates in these three WRT subsectors were consistently attributable to high rates in five subgroups within the subsectors: wholesalers of alcoholic beverages (114.8 in 2009), grocery and related products (30.9), metal and minerals (28.0), and motor vehicle parts and supplies (25.4); and furniture stores (27.2).
TABLE 2

Rate and trend of musculoskeletal disorder workers’ compensation claims per 10,000 employees, by claim status, WRT NAICS code, and single-location–employer size — Ohio, 2005–2009

WRT NAICS code employer size (no. of employees)20052009Trend analysis*

TotalLT




TotalLTTotalLTSlope(95% CLs)p-valueSlope(95% CLs)p-value
WRT NAICS total 86.3 28.7 52.8 14.1 −0.12 (−0.14, −0.10) <0.001 −0.17 (−0.20, −0.13) <0.001
Employer size
 1–1043.817.227.610.6−0.12(−0.13, −0.11)<0.001−0.15(−0.21, −0.08)<0.001
 11–4980.327.144.111.5−0.15(−0.16, −0.13)<0.001−0.19(−0.24, −0.15)<0.001
 50–249127.138.486.519.1−0.09(−0.12, −0.06)<0.001−0.14(−0.22, −0.07)<0.001
 ≥250135.249.1109.832.9−0.05(−0.08, −0.02)0.003−0.11(−0.22, 0.00)0.048
423 Merchant Wholesalers, Durable Goods 119.339.262.715.5−0.15(−0.17, −0.13)<0.001−0.22(−0.25, −0.20)<0.001
 1–1061.625.031.010.2−0.17(−0.18, −0.16)<0.001−0.27(−0.40, −0.15)<0.001
 11–49110.439.356.212.8−0.16(−0.19, −0.13)<0.001−0.25(−0.32, −0.17)<0.001
 50–249165.948.498.825.1−0.12(−0.14, −0.10)<0.001−0.16(−0.26, −0.06)0.002
 ≥250208.751.1107.117.1−0.12(−0.24, 0.01)0.066−0.36(−0.58, −0.14)0.001
424 Merchant Wholesalers, Nondurable Goods 138.951.3108.829.2−0.07(−0.08, −0.05)<0.001−0.13(−0.18, −0.09)<0.001
 1–1053.721.245.621.3−0.06(−0.15, 0.02)0.150−0.06(−0.22, 0.10)0.478
 11–49112.540.670.312.2−0.15(−0.21, −0.08)<0.001−0.31(−0.41, −0.20)<0.001
 50–249206.166.9154.634.5−0.06(−0.10, −0.03)<0.001−0.13(−0.21, −0.05)0.001
 ≥250156.677.5234.2100.40.09(0.01, 0.18)0.0320.07(−0.02, 0.17)0.136
425 Wholesale Electronic Markets and Agents and Brokers 61.416.337.410.5−0.13(−0.22, −0.05)0.001−0.16(−0.29, −0.03)0.017
 1–1035.27.923.69.0−0.11(−0.26, 0.04)0.1540.01(−0.18, 0.20)0.916
 11–4972.924.347.015.0−0.12(−0.24, 0.00)0.060−0.22(−0.55, 0.12)0.211
 50–249124.224.161.110.2−0.21(−0.44, 0.02)0.079−0.26(−0.58, 0.05)0.105
 ≥25055.220.111.60.0−0.25(−0.61, 0.12)0.184−0.55(−1.44, 0.35)0.231
441 Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers 66.122.046.714.4−0.09(−0.12, −0.06)<0.001−0.10(−0.15, −0.06)<0.001
 1–1069.527.842.318.3−0.10(−0.21, 0.01)0.062−0.14(−0.22, −0.05)0.002
 11–4958.222.135.115.9−0.10(−0.19, 0.00)0.048−0.08(−0.14, −0.02)0.008
 50–24967.820.955.312.0−0.08(−0.16, 0.00)0.040−0.13(−0.16, −0.10)<0.001
 ≥250128.612.2110.76.9−0.05(−0.13, 0.03)0.210−0.12(−0.52, 0.29)0.573
442 Furniture and Home Furnishings Stores 133.045.667.721.7−0.17(−0.25, −0.09)<0.001−0.23(−0.34, −0.12)<0.001
 1–1055.526.736.122.2−0.16(−0.36, 0.04)0.126−0.14(−0.47, 0.19)0.405
 11–49152.242.935.115.6−0.33(−0.42, −0.24)<0.001−0.29(−0.51, −0.08)0.007
 50–249296.2107.1192.321.4−0.07(−0.26, 0.12)0.480−0.28(−0.72, 0.16)0.208
 ≥250341.368.3NCNCNCNCNCNC
443 Electronics and Appliance Stores 58.912.838.65.9−0.13(−0.25, −0.02)0.024−0.19(−0.44, 0.06)0.141
 1–1033.413.439.10.00.01(−0.19, 0.22)0.896−0.58(−1.17, 0.01)0.053
 11–4975.319.639.49.8−0.20(−0.38, −0.01)0.034−0.13(−0.46, 0.20)0.452
 50–24992.70.054.112.0−0.14(−0.37, 0.08)0.2060.41(−0.29, 1.12)0.247
 ≥2500.00.00.00.00.34(−1.44, 2.12)0.709NCNCNC
444 Building Material and Garden Equipment and Supplies Dealers 109.834.554.113.5−0.17(−0.22, −0.11)<0.001−0.16(−0.26, −0.07)0.001
 1–1058.221.633.111.0−0.16(−0.28, −0.04)0.011−0.18(−0.39, 0.02)0.082
 11–49119.337.857.912.1−0.17(−0.25, −0.10)<0.001−0.17(−0.30, −0.03)0.014
 50–249167.545.999.026.1−0.10(−0.2, 0.00)0.052−0.08(−0.27, 0.11)0.384
 ≥250NCNCNCNCNCNC
445 Food and Beverage Stores 63.722.434.510.0−0.14(−0.19, −0.09)<0.001−0.16(−0.24, −0.07)<0.001
 1–1036.810.926.211.5−0.05(−0.17, 0.06)0.3850.02(−0.16, 0.21)0.829
 11–4950.219.627.56.9−0.13(−0.22, −0.05)0.002−0.24(−0.40, −0.08)0.003
 50–24997.136.254.610.2−0.12(−0.19, −0.04)0.002−0.20(−0.34, −0.06)0.006
 ≥250172.430.439.129.3−0.38(−0.55, −0.21)<0.001−0.09(−0.38, 0.21)0.571
446 Health and Personal Care Stores 17.04.717.42.9−0.02(−0.16, 0.13)0.839−0.11(−0.44, 0.22)0.512
 1–106.03.06.33.2−0.21(−0.75, 0.33)0.452−0.16(−0.97, 0.66)0.705
 11–4913.51.915.64.40.03(−0.24, 0.30)0.8130.47(−0.23, 1.17)0.188
 50–24954.318.156.50.0−0.04(−0.25, 0.17)0.723−0.53(−1.16, 0.11)0.105
 ≥2500.00.07.80.0−0.01(−0.44, 0.42)0.968−0.31(−1.11, 0.48)0.440
447 Gasoline Stations 41.413.530.612.3−0.07(−0.16, 0.03)0.185−0.02(−0.19, 0.15)0.791
 1–1036.321.028.312.1−0.02(−0.17, 0.14)0.823−0.08(−0.32, 0.17)0.528
 11–4921.74.024.57.40.00(−0.16, 0.16)0.966−0.01(−0.29, 0.28)0.964
 50–24986.217.299.059.4−0.03(−0.25, 0.19)0.7970.26(−0.21, 0.73)0.278
 ≥250135.119.337.90.0NCNCNCNCNCNC
448 Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores 38.211.121.54.5−0.18(−0.29, −0.08)0.001−0.15(−0.36, 0.05)0.145
 1–106.14.12.32.3−0.16(−0.51, 0.19)0.3780.03(−0.53, 0.59)0.918
 11–4919.25.511.63.9−0.25(−0.52, 0.02)0.071−0.04(−0.54, 0.45)0.864
 50–249121.632.075.410.1−0.16(−0.29, −0.03)0.014−0.22(−0.48, 0.04)0.101
 ≥2500.00.0NCNCNCNCNCNC
451 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, and Music Stores 32.68.417.73.8−0.17(−0.30, −0.03)0.016−0.15(−0.41, 0.10)0.241
 1–1017.24.915.23.0−0.18(−0.43, 0.07)0.154−0.35(−0.9, 0.19)0.204
 11–4926.07.813.76.9−0.19(−0.43, 0.05)0.121−0.07(−0.43, 0.30)0.717
 50–249105.922.711.30.0−0.30(−0.55, −0.04)0.022−0.06(−0.56, 0.44)0.817
 ≥2500.00.048.40.00.88(−0.05, 1.81)0.065NCNCNC
452 General Merchandise Stores 28.114.064.814.40.09(−0.13, 0.31)0.427−0.10(−0.55, 0.36)0.680
 1–1038.825.948.70.00.05(−0.40, 0.51)0.818−0.79(−1.95, 0.37)0.184
 11–4929.910.043.914.60.00(−0.34, 0.34)0.995−0.01(−0.64, 0.61)0.973
 50–2490.00.0333.3111.10.45(0.03, 0.86)0.0340.74(−0.42, 1.89)0.211
 ≥250NCNCNCNCNCNC
453 Miscellaneous Store Retailers 40.511.118.64.3−0.16(−0.24, −0.07)<0.001−0.17(−0.32, −0.01)0.035
 1–1025.68.512.16.7−0.19(−0.35, −0.03)0.019−0.03(−0.29, 0.23)0.846
 11–4948.510.022.02.0−0.16(−0.29, −0.03)0.016−0.16(−0.40, 0.09)0.203
 50–24965.320.838.70.0−0.07(−0.23, 0.10)0.425−0.31(−0.65, 0.03)0.074
 ≥250NCNCNCNCNCNC
454 Nonstore Retailers 106.040.255.813.2−0.14(−0.22, −0.05)0.001−0.22(−0.37, −0.06)0.006
 1–1083.241.622.60.0−0.21(−0.43, 0.00)0.054−0.50(−0.90, −0.09)0.017
 11–4980.917.656.318.8−0.09(−0.26, 0.07)0.2680.12(−0.19, 0.43)0.455
 50–24991.130.468.416.1−0.03(−0.17, 0.12)0.720−0.04(−0.31, 0.24)0.784
 ≥250185.284.7117.923.6−0.17(−0.34, −0.01)0.037−0.59(−0.98, −0.21)0.002

Abbreviations: WRT = wholesale retail trade; NAICS = North American Industry Classification System; LT = lost-time claims (excluding claims for which the size of the employer was unknown); CLs = confidence limits; NC = not calculable.

Trend analysis is based on 5 years of data. Trends were not calculable where rates were missing for ≥1 years.

FIGURE

Rates of workers’ compensation claims for musculoskeletal disorders resulting in lost-time per 10,000 employees, among the WRT NAICS subsectors with the highest rates — Ohio, 2005–2009

Abbreviations: WRT = wholesale retail trade; NAICS = North American Industry Classification System.

Editorial Note

Improved surveillance of work-related WMSDs is a national priority (4). This report demonstrates how workers’ compensation claims data can be used for public health surveillance. The results indicate that although the rate of WMSD claims (overall and lost-time) among workers employed by OBWC-insured employers declined from 2005 to 2009 for most WRT subsectors, workers in some subsectors experienced higher rates of WMSD claims than workers in other WRT subsectors. The factors responsible for the downward trends in WMSD claims in Ohio in the WRT industry are unclear. At the national level, a downward trend for incident WMSDs from 2005 to 2009 also has been observed (2). For all workers’ compensation claims and industry sectors, the National Council on Compensation Insurance has reported downward trends among many states since the 1990s (5), attributing the trends, at least in part, to 1) advances in automation, technology, and production; 2) an aging workforce (older workers tend to have fewer claims [6]); and 3) increased focus on workplace safety and loss control. Workers in the WRT subsectors with the highest rates of workers’ compensation claims are exposed to physical risk factors for WMSDs such as overexertion or repetitive motion (7). Work tasks in subgroups among those with the highest claim rates within the WRT subsectors (e.g., furniture stores and wholesalers of alcoholic beverages) commonly include lifting and transporting large, heavy objects. The Occupational Safety & Health Administration has created ergonomic training tools that outline injury prevention activities for beverage delivery and grocery warehousing.¶ Certain interventions (e.g., stair-climbing dollies, keg-handling equipment, and forklifts) can reduce many but not all manual material-handling tasks in these subgroups. The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, this report is only representative of smaller employers (<500 employees) with a single location in Ohio. Second, the Bayesian auto-coding method used to identify WMSD claims introduces the potential for misclassification. However, misclassification is not expected to create bias in WMSD rates by WRT subsector. Finally, studies have estimated that workers’ compensation claims data underreport work-related injuries and illnesses by 40%–80% (8–10). However, whereas underreporting of injuries and illnesses might reduce the size of claim rates, whether the differences observed among WRT subsectors or employers of different sizes were affected by underreporting is unknown. The findings in this report suggest that the number and rate of WMSD claims declined from 2005 to 2009 among small WRT employers in Ohio, but relatively high rates of WMSD claims occurred among certain WRT subsectors and subgroups. Interventions to reduce exposure to ergonomic hazards in these subsectors and subgroups should continue to be developed and implemented to prevent WMSDs. Given the large workforce employed in the WRT industry, declines in the number of WMSDs could substantially reduce the number of workplace injuries and illnesses overall. What is already known on this topic? Workers in the Wholesale and Retail Trade (WRT) industry have more work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) resulting in lost work days than do most other workers. What is added by this report? Based on an analysis of claims filed with the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation by single-location WRT employers, WMSD claims decreased from 86.3 per 10,000 employees in 2005 to 52.8 in 2009. The WRT industry subsectors with the highest rates of WMSD claims during 2005–2009 were Wholesalers, Nondurable Goods; Furniture and Home Furnishings Stores; and Wholesalers, Durable Goods. Within those three WRT subsectors, the highest rates of WMSD claims were noted in five subgroups: furniture stores and wholesalers of alcoholic beverages, groceries and related products, metal and minerals, and motor vehicle parts. What are the implications for public health practice? Although the rate of claims for WMSD resulting in lost work days has decreased in the WRT industry in Ohio, workers continue to experience WMSDs, and some WRT subsectors are experiencing higher rates of WMSD claims than others. Prevention efforts are most needed in the WRT subgroups, wholesalers of alcoholic beverages and groceries and related products.
  4 in total

1.  Reporting of work-related musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) to workers compensation.

Authors:  T Morse; C Dillon; N Warren
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2000

2.  Bayesian methods: a useful tool for classifying injury narratives into cause groups.

Authors:  M Lehto; H Marucci-Wellman; H Corns
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.399

3.  Under-reporting of work-related disorders in the workplace: a case study and review of the literature.

Authors:  G Pransky; T Snyder; A Dembe; J Himmelstein
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  Occupational fatalities, injuries, illnesses, and related economic loss in the wholesale and retail trade sector.

Authors:  Vern Putz Anderson; Paul A Schulte; John Sestito; Herb Linn; Long S Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.214

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.