Literature DB >> 2373818

Aortic regurgitation shortens Doppler pressure half-time in mitral stenosis: clinical evidence, in vitro simulation and theoretic analysis.

F A Flachskampf1, A E Weyman, L Gillam, C M Liu, V M Abascal, J D Thomas.   

Abstract

Mitral valve areas determined by Doppler pressure half-time were compared with areas obtained by planimetry in two groups of patients with mitral stenosis: 24 patients without aortic regurgitation and 32 patients with more than grade 1 aortic regurgitation. The severity of aortic regurgitation was assessed by color flow mapping; 17 patients had grade 2, 10 had grade 3 and 5 had grade 4 aortic regurgitation. Regression equations for pressure half-time area versus planimetry mitral valve area were calculated separately for the aortic regurgitation (r = 0.88) and the nonaortic regurgitation group (r = 0.86); analysis of covariance revealed a significant (p less than 0.001) difference between the two groups leading to overestimation of planimetry area by the pressure half-time method in the aortic regurgitation group. The mitral valve areas in the group without regurgitation were best calculated with the expression 239/T1/2 (r = 0.77) as compared with a best fit of 195/T1/2 (r = 0.85) for the aortic regurgitation group. To elucidate the mechanisms affecting pressure half-time in aortic regurgitation, an in vitro model of mitral inflow in the presence of varying regurgitant volumes and different ventricular chamber compliances was used. Aortic regurgitation shortened directly measured pressure half-time proportional to the regurgitant fraction but an increase in left ventricular compliance could offset this effect. Finally, in a mathematic model of mitral inflow the competing effects of aortic regurgitation and chamber compliance could be confirmed. In conclusion, aortic regurgitation results clinically in a significant net shortening of pressure half-time leading to mitral valve area overestimation. However, the effect is moderate and individually unpredictable because of changes in chamber compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2373818     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90592-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Aortic stenosis].

Authors:  W G Daniel; H Baumgartner; C Gohlke-Bärwolf; P Hanrath; D Horstkotte; K C Koch; A Mügge; H J Schäfers; F A Flachskampf
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Simplifying proximal isovelocity surface area as an assessment method of mitral valve area in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis by fixing aliasing velocity and mitral valve angle.

Authors:  Alaa Mabrouk Salem Omar; Mohammed Ahmed Abdel-Rahman; Hidekazu Tanaka; Osama Rifaie
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2012-12-04

3.  Quantification of mitral valve stenosis by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  I Kupferwasser; S Mohr-Kahaly; T Menzel; M Spiecker; G Dohmen; E Mayer; H Oelert; R Erbel; J Meyer
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1996-12

Review 4.  Stenotic lesions.

Authors:  B Wranne; H Baumgartner; F Flachskampf; M Hasenkam; F Pinto
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Echocardiographic diagnosis of adult valvular heart disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 6.  Indication and timing of percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy and the role of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  J Langerveld; J M P G Ernst; N M van Hemel; W Jaarsma
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Assessment of mitral valve disease: a review of imaging modalities.

Authors:  Shweta R Motiwala; Francesca N Delling
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-07

8.  Clinical application in routine practice of the proximal flow convergence method to calculate the mitral surface area in mitral valve stenosis.

Authors:  Ahmed Bennis; Abdennasser Drighil; Christophe Tribouilloy; Asmaa Drighil; Nacer Chraibi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Pathophysiology and management of multivalvular disease.

Authors:  Philippe Unger; Marie-Annick Clavel; Brian R Lindman; Patrick Mathieu; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Quantification of stenotic mitral valve area and diagnostic accuracy of mitral stenosis by dual-source computed tomography in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Song Soo Kim; Sung Min Ko; Meong Gun Song; Hyun Kun Chee; Jun Suk Kim; Hweung Kon Hwang; Jae-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.