Literature DB >> 23737470

Comparative assessment for the ability of Cirrus, RTVue, and 3D-OCT to diagnose glaucoma.

Azusa Akashi1, Akiyasu Kanamori, Makoto Nakamura, Masashi Fujihara, Yuko Yamada, Akira Negi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the ability of circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) thickness and macular parameters obtained by three spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) instruments to detect glaucoma.
METHODS: We enrolled 87 normal eyes and 145 glaucomatous eyes (75 early glaucomatous eyes (EGs), mean deviation > -6 dB). Each participant was imaged using Cirrus, RTVue, and 3D-OCT to evaluate the average and quadrant cpRNFL thicknesses. The macular retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL), ganglion cell layer plus inner plexiform layer (GCL/IPL), and mRNFL + GCL/IPL (ganglion cell complex [GCC]) thicknesses were analyzed. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were compared among the instruments.
RESULTS: These instruments revealed similar AUCs for the average cpRNFL and GCC thicknesses in EGs, and total all-stage glaucomatous eyes (TGs). RTVue showed better performance in the nasal cpRNFL thickness than Cirrus and 3D-OCT, and better performance in the temporal cpRNFL thickness than 3D-OCT in TGs. RTVue had a higher AUC for the superior GCC thickness compared to Cirrus and 3D-OCT in EGs, and TGs. Cirrus had higher AUCs for GCL/IPL parameters in TGs, and lower AUCs for the mRNFL parameters in EGs and TGs compared to 3D-OCT.
CONCLUSIONS: The average cpRNFL and GCC thicknesses measured using these OCT instruments exhibited similar abilities in the diagnosis of glaucoma, and RTVue exhibited better diagnostic abilities than Cirrus and 3D-OCT for nasal cpRNFL, and superior GCC thicknesses. The diagnostic performance of Cirrus and 3D-OCT was different for GCL/IPL and mRNFL parameters. (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr number, UMIN000006900.)

Entities:  

Keywords:  ganglion cell layer; glaucoma; optical coherence tomography; retinal nerve fiber layer thickness

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23737470     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-11268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  27 in total

1.  Evaluation of Visual Field and Imaging Outcomes for Glaucoma Clinical Trials (An American Ophthalomological Society Thesis).

Authors:  David F Garway-Heath; Ana Quartilho; Philip Prah; David P Crabb; Qian Cheng; Haogang Zhu
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2017-08-22

2.  Difference in correspondence between visual field defect and inner macular layer thickness measured using three types of spectral-domain OCT instruments.

Authors:  Kaori Ueda; Akiyasu Kanamori; Azusa Akashi; Yuki Kawaka; Yuko Yamada; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  [Principles of glaucoma diagnostics with optical coherence tomography].

Authors:  C Y Mardin
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  Parameters of ocular fundus on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for glaucoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Yu-Lin Tao; Li-Ming Tao; Zheng-Xuan Jiang; He-Ting Liu; Kun Liang; Mo-Han Li; Xuan-Sheng Zhu; Yan-Lin Ren; Bing-Jie Cui
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell complex thicknesses measured with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in eyes with no light perception due to nonglaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Atsuya Miki; Takao Endo; Takeshi Morimoto; Kenji Matsushita; Takashi Fujikado; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Diagnostic ability of retinal nerve fiber layer imaging by swept-source optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.

Authors:  Zhiyong Yang; Andrew J Tatham; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Chunwei Zhang; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Structural and functional assessment of macula to diagnose glaucoma.

Authors:  H L Rao; R S M Hussain; M Januwada; L N Pillutla; V U Begum; A Chaitanya; S Senthil; C S Garudadri
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 8.  Optic nerve head and fibre layer imaging for diagnosing glaucoma.

Authors:  Manuele Michelessi; Ersilia Lucenteforte; Francesco Oddone; Miriam Brazzelli; Mariacristina Parravano; Sara Franchi; Sueko M Ng; Gianni Virgili
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-30

9.  One Year of Glaucoma Research in Review: 2012 to 2013.

Authors:  Charles Kim; Anna M Demetriades; Nathan M Radcliffe
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

10.  Comparative analysis of mean retinal thickness measured using SD-OCT in normal young or old age and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Jun Won Jang; Myung Won Lee; Kyong Jin Cho
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.