| Literature DB >> 23736693 |
Shichao Jiang1, Wei Wang, Hede Yan, Cunyi Fan.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the anti-adhesion efficacy of a bi-layer electrospun fibrous membrane consisting of hyaluronic acid-loaded poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) fibrous membrane as the inner layer and PCL fibrous membrane as the outer layer with a single-layer PCL electrospun fibrous membrane in a rat cecum abrasion model. The rat model utilized a cecal abrasion and abdominal wall insult surgical protocol. The bi-layer and PCL membranes were applied between the cecum and the abdominal wall, respectively. Control animals did not receive any treatment. After postoperative day 14, a visual semiquantitative grading scale was used to grade the extent of adhesion. Histological analysis was performed to reveal the features of adhesion tissues. Bi-layer membrane treated animals showed significantly lower adhesion scores than control animals (p < 0.05) and a lower adhesion score compared with the PCL membrane. Histological analysis of the bi-layer membrane treated rat rarely demonstrated tissue adhesion while that of the PCL membrane treated rat and control rat showed loose and dense adhesion tissues, respectively. Bi-layer membrane can efficiently prevent adhesion formation in abdominal cavity and showed a significantly decreased adhesion tissue formation compared with the control.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23736693 PMCID: PMC3709760 DOI: 10.3390/ijms140611861
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1SEM observation for cross-sectional and surface morphological features of Polycaprolactone (PCL) fibers and hyaluronan (HA)/PCL fibers. (A) Cross-sectional of bi-layer electrospun fibrous membrane; (B) PCL electrospun fibers of outer layer; (C) HA/PCL electrospun fibers of inner layer.
Figure 2Gross evaluation of a rat cecum abrasion model after 14 days. (A) Group treated with bi-layer membrane; (B) Group treated with single-layer membrane; (C) Untreated group. Yellow arrows indicate the adhesion areas.
Figure 3The average scores of intra-abdominal adhesion in the control group, bi-layer membrane group and PCL electrospun fibrous membranes group are presented as mean ± SD (n = 8).(* p < 0.05 vs. Control).
Figure 4Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining of abdominal wall defects from bi-layer membrane treated (A,B), single-layer membrane treated (C,D) and untreated animals with severe adhesion (*) between the abdominal wall (AW) and the cecum (CE) surface. Remnants of the materials are highlighted with yellow arrows and located inside the re-epithelialized (RE) abdominal wall defect site.