Literature DB >> 23735934

Vibrio cholerae O1 isolate with novel genetic background, Thailand-Myanmar.

Kazuhisa Okada, Amonrattana Roobthaisong, Witaya Swaddiwudhipong, Shigeyuki Hamada, Siriporn Chantaroj.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  El Tor; Myanmar; Thailand; Vibrio cholerae O1; antibiotics; antimicrobial drugs; bacteria; cholera; classical; enteric infections; pandemic; toxin coregulated pilus

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23735934      PMCID: PMC3713811          DOI: 10.3201/eid1906.120345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Vibrio cholerae O1, a causative agent of cholera, was classified into 2 biotypes, classical and El Tor (). However, accumulating evidence suggests that atypical El Tor V. cholerae, which possesses traits of both classical and El Tor biotypes, has replaced the seventh pandemic prototypic El Tor V. cholerae worldwide in recent years. Cholera outbreaks in Thailand during 2007–2010 were caused by atypical El Tor isolates carrying the classical type cholera toxin gene (). Epidemiologic surveys in a Thailand–Myanmar border area during 2008 yielded more than 500 isolates of V. cholerae O1. We identified an isolate that possessed the typical El Tor type cholera toxin gene (genotype 3) and designated it MS6 (later assigned strain number DMST28216). It does not belong to either the seventh pandemic prototypic biotype identified in 1961 or the group of atypical El Tor strains found during 1991–present (). MS6 was isolated from stool samples from a 26-year-old woman (migrant worker) from Myanmar who had been admitted to Mae Sot General Hospital in Tak Province, Thailand, for 3 days with vomiting, watery diarrhea, nausea, fever, and headache. The illness was considered mild to moderate. Acute gastroenteritis was diagnosed on the basis of the symptoms and laboratory results. The key virulence factors of V. cholerae O1 include cholera toxin (CTX), which is responsible for profuse watery diarrhea, and a pilus colonization factor known as toxin-coregulated pilus (TCP). The virulence-related genes (ctxAB and tcpA) and the phage repressor gene (rstR) of MS6 had identical sequences to those of the seventh pandemic prototypic El Tor V. cholerae O1 N16961 strain. The isolate was found to be positive for enteric bacteria in the Voges-Proskauer test and resistant to polymyxin B (50 units). We further investigated 2 gene clusters, Vibrio seventh pandemic island I (VSP-I) and II (VSP-II), associated with the seventh pandemic strains and absent in classical and pre–seventh pandemic strains (–). The common genes on the VSP-I island in N16961, including VC0175, VC0178, VC0180, VC0181, and VC0183, were detected by PCR () in MS6 but were lacking in VSP-II; 26.9 kb of VSP-II was originally found in N16961. Moreover, PCR analysis showed that the isolate did not possess the VC2346 gene, a specific marker of the seventh pandemic clone (,). However, we found a VC2346 homolog with 83.9% sequence identity with VC2346 at the nucleotide level and 97% at the amino acid level in the 624-bp region. The coding region of the homolog is considered to be shorter than VC2346 (684 bp) because it contains the stop codon, TAG. This homolog was identified in environmental, classical, or pre–seventh pandemic strains of V. cholerae O1 (), including MS6, and in 2740–80 (US Gulf Coast, 1980), 3569–08 (US Gulf Coast, 2008), BX33026 (environmental water in Australia, 1986), RC27 (classical, human isolate in Indonesia, 1991), O395 (classical, human isolate in India, 1965), MAK757 and M66–2 (pre–seventh pandemic, human isolate in Indonesia, 1937), and NCTC 8457 (pre–seventh pandemic, human isolate in Saudi Arabia, 1910), excluding seventh pandemic strains. This conservation of the homologue of VC2346 in strains isolated over the course of a century and the geographic distribution of the strains suggest a notable biologic function and a specific marker. In addition, we determined the sequences of 15 housekeeping genes which exhibited sequence variations in toxigenic V. cholerae (). The results indicated that by comparison, MS6 is closely related to the US Gulf clones (Figure). However, 2 genes, malP and pepN, of MS6 are remotely related to them and are novel sequence types, based on results of a BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) search. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by using the disk diffusion method revealed that MS6 was susceptible to chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, tetracycline, streptomycin, furazolidone, doxycycline, and norfloxacin, and had intermediate susceptibility to ampicillin and erythromycin, suggesting that MS6 had not been exposed to several antimicrobial drugs. The V. cholerae SXT element, which usually shows code drug-resistance markers, integrates into a specific site of the prfC gene. In MS6, the complete prfC gene was detected. The accession numbers of DDBJ for nucleotide sequences determined in this study are AB699244-AB699265. MS6 possesses unique properties in terms of the ribotype, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis pattern, and multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis profile, compared with other V. cholerae O1 isolates ().
Figure

Relationships among MS6, Vibrio cholerae O1 strain, isolated in Thailand in 2008, and other V. cholerae O1 strains based on 15 housekeeping genes referenced in Salim et al. (). Boldface indicates the MS6 strain. The mutational (m) and recombinational (r) changes with gene names are marked on the branches (r ≠ r2). Numbers in parentheses represent the year of isolation. DNA gyrase subunit B gene (gyrB) of MS6 is 22 nt differences from that of the seventh pandemic clone. Two genes of MS6, malP and pepN, exhibit novel sequence types based on results of a BLAST search (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).

Relationships among MS6, Vibrio cholerae O1 strain, isolated in Thailand in 2008, and other V. cholerae O1 strains based on 15 housekeeping genes referenced in Salim et al. (). Boldface indicates the MS6 strain. The mutational (m) and recombinational (r) changes with gene names are marked on the branches (r ≠ r2). Numbers in parentheses represent the year of isolation. DNA gyrase subunit B gene (gyrB) of MS6 is 22 nt differences from that of the seventh pandemic clone. Two genes of MS6, malP and pepN, exhibit novel sequence types based on results of a BLAST search (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). This case was probably an episode of sporadic cholera from indigenous V. cholerae O1, such as US Gulf Coast and Australian clones, which are mainly associated with environmental sources. We have been unable to isolate another MS6-like clone, which could have escaped detection because of low prevalence or might exist in a dormant state in a rural area. Nevertheless, the transmission route and its pathogenicity must be of concern for public health.
  10 in total

1.  Comparative genomic analysis of Vibrio cholerae: genes that correlate with cholera endemic and pandemic disease.

Authors:  Michelle Dziejman; Emmy Balon; Dana Boyd; Clare M Fraser; John F Heidelberg; John J Mekalanos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Occurrence of the Vibrio cholerae seventh pandemic VSP-I island and a new variant.

Authors:  Christopher J Grim; Jinna Choi; Jongsik Chun; Yoon-Seong Jeon; Elisa Taviani; Nur A Hasan; Bradd Haley; Anwar Huq; Rita R Colwell
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2010-02

3.  Discovery of novel Vibrio cholerae VSP-II genomic islands using comparative genomic analysis.

Authors:  Elisa Taviani; Christopher J Grim; Jinna Choi; Jongsik Chun; Bradd Haley; Nur A Hasan; Anwar Huq; Rita R Colwell
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 4.  Evolution of new variants of Vibrio cholerae O1.

Authors:  Ashrafus Safa; G Balakrish Nair; Richard Y C Kong
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 5.  Cholera.

Authors:  David A Sack; R Bradley Sack; G Balakrish Nair; A K Siddique
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Evolutionary genetic analysis of the emergence of epidemic Vibrio cholerae isolates on the basis of comparative nucleotide sequence analysis and multilocus virulence gene profiles.

Authors:  Yvonne A O'Shea; F Jerry Reen; Anne Marie Quirke; E Fidelma Boyd
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparative genomics reveals mechanism for short-term and long-term clonal transitions in pandemic Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  Jongsik Chun; Christopher J Grim; Nur A Hasan; Je Hee Lee; Seon Young Choi; Bradd J Haley; Elisa Taviani; Yoon-Seong Jeon; Dong Wook Kim; Jae-Hak Lee; Thomas S Brettin; David C Bruce; Jean F Challacombe; J Chris Detter; Cliff S Han; A Christine Munk; Olga Chertkov; Linda Meincke; Elizabeth Saunders; Ronald A Walters; Anwar Huq; G Balakrish Nair; Rita R Colwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Characterization of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae from Haiti, 2010-2011.

Authors:  Deborah Talkington; Cheryl Bopp; Cheryl Tarr; Michele B Parsons; Georges Dahourou; Molly Freeman; Kevin Joyce; Maryann Turnsek; Nancy Garrett; Michael Humphrys; Gerardo Gomez; Steven Stroika; Jacques Boncy; Benjamin Ochieng; Joseph Oundo; John Klena; Anthony Smith; Karen Keddy; Peter Gerner-Smidt
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Vibrio cholerae pathogenic clones.

Authors:  Anna Salim; Ruiting Lan; Peter R Reeves
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Genotypic and PFGE/MLVA analyses of Vibrio cholerae O1: geographical spread and temporal changes during the 2007-2010 cholera outbreaks in Thailand.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Okada; Amonrattana Roobthaisong; Ichiro Nakagawa; Shigeyuki Hamada; Siriporn Chantaroj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Origins of the current seventh cholera pandemic.

Authors:  Dalong Hu; Bin Liu; Lu Feng; Peng Ding; Xi Guo; Min Wang; Boyang Cao; Peter R Reeves; Lei Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The Hybrid Pre-CTXΦ-RS1 Prophage Genome and Its Regulatory Function in Environmental Vibrio cholerae O1 Strains.

Authors:  Hongxia Wang; Bo Pang; Lifeng Xiong; Duochun Wang; Xiaomei Wang; Lijuan Zhang; Biao Kan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  Munmun Mukherjee; Prathusha Kakarla; Sanath Kumar; Esmeralda Gonzalez; Jared T Floyd; Madhuri Inupakutika; Amith Reddy Devireddy; Selena R Tirrell; Merissa Bruns; Guixin He; Ingrid E Lindquist; Anitha Sundararajan; Faye D Schilkey; Joann Mudge; Manuel F Varela
Journal:  Genom Discov       Date:  2014

4.  Characterization and Genetic Variation of Vibrio cholerae Isolated from Clinical and Environmental Sources in Thailand.

Authors:  Achiraya Siriphap; Pimlapas Leekitcharoenphon; Rolf S Kaas; Chonchanok Theethakaew; Frank M Aarestrup; Orasa Sutheinkul; Rene S Hendriksen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Exception to the Rule: Genomic Characterization of Naturally Occurring Unusual Vibrio cholerae Strains with a Single Chromosome.

Authors:  Gary Xie; Shannon L Johnson; Karen W Davenport; Mathumathi Rajavel; Torsten Waldminghaus; John C Detter; Patrick S Chain; Shanmuga Sozhamannan
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.326

6.  Recent Vibrio cholerae O1 Epidemic Strains Are Unable To Replicate CTXΦ Prophage Genome.

Authors:  Kaoru Ochi; Tamaki Mizuno; Prosenjit Samanta; Asish K Mukhopadhyay; Shin-Ichi Miyoshi; Daisuke Imamura
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.389

7.  Comparative genomic characterization of a Thailand-Myanmar isolate, MS6, of Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor, which is phylogenetically related to a "US Gulf Coast" clone.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Okada; Mathukorn Na-Ubol; Wirongrong Natakuathung; Amonrattana Roobthaisong; Fumito Maruyama; Ichiro Nakagawa; Siriporn Chantaroj; Shigeyuki Hamada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Vibrio cholerae embraces two major evolutionary traits as revealed by targeted gene sequencing.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Okada; Warawan Wongboot; Siriporn Chantaroj; Wirongrong Natakuathung; Amonrattana Roobthaisong; Watcharaporn Kamjumphol; Fumito Maruyama; Taichiro Takemura; Ichiro Nakagawa; Makoto Ohnishi; Shigeyuki Hamada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.