BACKGROUND: Self-monitoring with self-titration of antihypertensives leads to reduced blood pressure. Patients are keen on self-monitoring but little is known about healthcare professional views. AIM: To explore health professionals' views and experiences of patient self-management, particularly with respect to future implementation into routine care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative study embedded within a randomised controlled trial of healthcare professionals participating in the TASMINH2 trial of patient self-monitoring with self-titration of antihypertensives from 24 West Midlands general practices. METHOD: Taped and transcribed semi-structured interviews with 13 GPs, two practice nurses and one healthcare assistant. Constant comparative method of analysis. RESULTS: Primary care professionals were positive about self-monitoring, but procedures for ensuring patients measured blood pressure correctly were haphazard. GPs interpreted home readings variably, with many not making adjustment for lower home blood pressure. Interviewees were satisfied with patient training and arrangements for blood pressure monitoring and self-titration of medication during the trial, but less sure about future implementation into routine care. There was evidence of a need for training of both patients and professionals for successful integration of self-management. CONCLUSION: Health professionals wanted more patient involvement in hypertension care but needed a framework to work within. Consideration of how to train patients to measure blood pressure and how home readings become part of their care is required before self-monitoring and self-titration can be implemented widely. As home monitoring becomes more widespread, the development of patient self-management, including self-titration of medication, should follow but this may take time to achieve.
BACKGROUND: Self-monitoring with self-titration of antihypertensives leads to reduced blood pressure. Patients are keen on self-monitoring but little is known about healthcare professional views. AIM: To explore health professionals' views and experiences of patient self-management, particularly with respect to future implementation into routine care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative study embedded within a randomised controlled trial of healthcare professionals participating in the TASMINH2 trial of patient self-monitoring with self-titration of antihypertensives from 24 West Midlands general practices. METHOD: Taped and transcribed semi-structured interviews with 13 GPs, two practice nurses and one healthcare assistant. Constant comparative method of analysis. RESULTS: Primary care professionals were positive about self-monitoring, but procedures for ensuring patients measured blood pressure correctly were haphazard. GPs interpreted home readings variably, with many not making adjustment for lower home blood pressure. Interviewees were satisfied with patient training and arrangements for blood pressure monitoring and self-titration of medication during the trial, but less sure about future implementation into routine care. There was evidence of a need for training of both patients and professionals for successful integration of self-management. CONCLUSION: Health professionals wanted more patient involvement in hypertension care but needed a framework to work within. Consideration of how to train patients to measure blood pressure and how home readings become part of their care is required before self-monitoring and self-titration can be implemented widely. As home monitoring becomes more widespread, the development of patient self-management, including self-titration of medication, should follow but this may take time to achieve.
Authors: András Tislér; Andrea Dunai; András Keszei; Bertalan Fekete; Taha El Hadj Othmane; Péter Torzsa; Alexander G Logan Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Anthony J Viera; Lauren W Cohen; C Madeline Mitchell; Philip D Sloane Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Patricia Martínez-Ibáñez; Irene Marco-Moreno; Salvador Peiró; Lucia Martínez-Ibáñez; Ignacio Barreira-Franch; Laura Bellot-Pujalte; Eugenia Avelino-Hidalgo; Marina Escrig-Veses; María Bóveda-García; Mercedes Calleja-Del-Ser; Andreu Ferrero-Gregori; Adina A Iftimi; Isabel Hurtado; Aníbal García-Sempere; Clara L Rodríguez-Bernal; Margarita Giménez-Loreiro; Gabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno; José Sanfélix-Genovés Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-10-11 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Katherine Morton; Laura Dennison; Carl May; Elizabeth Murray; Paul Little; Richard J McManus; Lucy Yardley Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-10-20
Authors: Nan Lv; Lan Xiao; Martha L Simmons; Lisa G Rosas; Albert Chan; Martin Entwistle Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Sabrina Grant; James A Hodgkinson; Siobhan L Milner; Una Martin; Alice Tompson; Fd Richard Hobbs; Jonathan Mant; Richard J McManus; Sheila M Greenfield Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2016-07-05 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Heather May Morgan; Vikki A Entwistle; Alan Cribb; Simon Christmas; John Owens; Zoë C Skea; Ian S Watt Journal: Health Expect Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 3.377