Literature DB >> 18300854

Attitudes of primary care physicians and their patients about home blood pressure monitoring in Ontario.

Alexander G Logan1, Andrea Dunai, Warren J McIsaac, M Jane Irvine, Andras Tisler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines recommend home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) to improve blood pressure control, but the attitudes of primary care physicians and their hypertensive patients towards its use are not known.
METHODS: A 28-item self-administered survey about home blood pressure monitoring was mailed to a random sample of 1418 primary care physicians in Ontario and 765 (55%) were returned. Of the 478 physicians treating hypertension, 299 agreed to give surveys to their hypertensive patients. We received 149 patient surveys.
RESULTS: The majority of primary care physicians (63%) often or almost always encouraged their hypertensive patients to monitor their own blood pressure at home. Only 13%, however, preferred home blood pressure monitoring to office or ambulatory readings for diagnostic purposes and 19%, to guide therapy. Physicians had concerns about patients becoming preoccupied with home monitoring (70%) and the accuracy of home devices (65%). Most patients (78%) had a device at home, and 84% indicated that their doctor encouraged them to measure blood pressure. Yet, 80% received no advice from their physician on the type of device to purchase, only 8% had specific training on proper measurement technique, 68% did not regularly take the results to the doctor and 39% did nothing specific about alarming readings.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians prefer office or ambulatory to home readings to make diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. While home monitoring is popular among patients, its clinical usefulness is undermined by the lack of reliable purchasing information, standard measurement protocols, proper training on measurement technique and specific instructions on handling and interpreting results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18300854     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f2fdd4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  33 in total

1.  Home blood pressure monitoring among Canadian adults with hypertension: results from the 2009 Survey on Living with Chronic Diseases in Canada.

Authors:  Christina M Bancej; Norm Campbell; Donald W McKay; Marianne Nichol; Robin L Walker; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.223

2.  Barriers to conducting ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring during hypertension screening in the United States.

Authors:  Ian M Kronish; Shia Kent; Nathalie Moise; Daichi Shimbo; Monika M Safford; Robert E Kynerd; Ronan O'Beirne; Alexandra Sullivan; Paul Muntner
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2017-07-06

3.  Performance and persistence of a blood pressure self-management intervention: telemonitoring and self-management in hypertension (TASMINH2) trial.

Authors:  E P Bray; M I Jones; M Banting; S Greenfield; F D R Hobbs; P Little; B Williams; R J Mcmanus
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 4.  Blood Pressure Assessment in Adults in Clinical Practice and Clinic-Based Research: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Paula T Einhorn; William C Cushman; Paul K Whelton; Natalie A Bello; Paul E Drawz; Beverly B Green; Daniel W Jones; Stephen P Juraschek; Karen L Margolis; Edgar R Miller; Ann Marie Navar; Yechiam Ostchega; Michael K Rakotz; Bernard Rosner; Joseph E Schwartz; Daichi Shimbo; George S Stergiou; Raymond R Townsend; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright; Lawrence J Appel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Randomized clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of remote patient monitoring and physician care in reducing office blood pressure.

Authors:  Yoon-Nyun Kim; Dong Gu Shin; Sungha Park; Chang Hee Lee
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.872

6.  Sharing patient-generated data with healthcare providers: findings from a 2019 national survey.

Authors:  Kea Turner; Ara Jo; Grace Wei; Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Alecia Clary; Heather S L Jim
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  When does personalized feedback make a difference? A narrative review of recent findings and their implications for promoting better diabetes self-care.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Lawrence Fisher
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.810

8.  Self-monitoring in hypertension: a web-based survey of primary care physicians.

Authors:  R J McManus; S Wood; E P Bray; P Glasziou; A Hayen; C Heneghan; J Mant; P Padfield; J F Potter; F D R Hobbs
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.012

9.  Prevalence and factors affecting home blood pressure documentation in routine clinical care: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Michael H Kramer; Eugene Breydo; Maria Shubina; Kelly Babcock; Jonathan S Einbinder; Alexander Turchin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Clinical implications of ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Soon-Gil Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.