PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in patients with multiple myeloma treated in the MRC (Medical Research Council) Myeloma IX trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) was used to assess MRD after induction therapy (n = 378) and at day 100 after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT; n = 397) in intensive-pathway patients and at the end of induction therapy in non-intensive-pathway patients (n = 245). RESULTS: In intensive-pathway patients, absence of MRD at day 100 after ASCT was highly predictive of a favorable outcome (PFS, P < .001; OS, P = .0183). This outcome advantage was demonstrable in patients with favorable and adverse cytogenetics (PFS, P = .014 and P < .001, respectively) and in patients achieving immunofixation-negative complete response (CR; PFS, P = .0068). The effect of maintenance thalidomide was assessed, with the shortest PFS demonstrable in those MRD-positive patients who did not receive maintenance and longest in those who were MRD negative and did receive thalidomide (P < .001). Further analysis demonstrated that 28% of MRD-positive patients who received maintenance thalidomide became MRD negative. MRD assessment after induction therapy in the non-intensive-pathway patients did not seem to be predictive of outcome (PFS, P = .1). CONCLUSION:MRD assessment by MFC was predictive of overall outcome in patients with myeloma undergoing ASCT. This predictive value was seen in patients achieving conventional CR as well as patients with favorable and adverse cytogenetics. The effects of maintenance strategies can also be evaluated, and our data suggest that maintenance thalidomide can eradicate MRD in some patients.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in patients with multiple myeloma treated in the MRC (Medical Research Council) Myeloma IX trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) was used to assess MRD after induction therapy (n = 378) and at day 100 after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT; n = 397) in intensive-pathway patients and at the end of induction therapy in non-intensive-pathway patients (n = 245). RESULTS: In intensive-pathway patients, absence of MRD at day 100 after ASCT was highly predictive of a favorable outcome (PFS, P < .001; OS, P = .0183). This outcome advantage was demonstrable in patients with favorable and adverse cytogenetics (PFS, P = .014 and P < .001, respectively) and in patients achieving immunofixation-negative complete response (CR; PFS, P = .0068). The effect of maintenance thalidomide was assessed, with the shortest PFS demonstrable in those MRD-positive patients who did not receive maintenance and longest in those who were MRD negative and did receive thalidomide (P < .001). Further analysis demonstrated that 28% of MRD-positive patients who received maintenance thalidomide became MRD negative. MRD assessment after induction therapy in the non-intensive-pathway patients did not seem to be predictive of outcome (PFS, P = .1). CONCLUSION: MRD assessment by MFC was predictive of overall outcome in patients with myeloma undergoing ASCT. This predictive value was seen in patients achieving conventional CR as well as patients with favorable and adverse cytogenetics. The effects of maintenance strategies can also be evaluated, and our data suggest that maintenance thalidomide can eradicate MRD in some patients.
Authors: Peter M Voorhees; Jonathan L Kaufman; Jacob Laubach; Douglas W Sborov; Brandi Reeves; Cesar Rodriguez; Ajai Chari; Rebecca Silbermann; Luciano J Costa; Larry D Anderson; Nitya Nathwani; Nina Shah; Yvonne A Efebera; Sarah A Holstein; Caitlin Costello; Andrzej Jakubowiak; Tanya M Wildes; Robert Z Orlowski; Kenneth H Shain; Andrew J Cowan; Sean Murphy; Yana Lutska; Huiling Pei; Jon Ukropec; Jessica Vermeulen; Carla de Boer; Daniela Hoehn; Thomas S Lin; Paul G Richardson Journal: Blood Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: L Giaccone; L Brunello; M Festuccia; M Gilestro; E Maffini; F Ferrando; E Talamo; R Passera; M Boccadoro; P Omedè; B Bruno Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: David Avigan; Parameswaran Hari; Minoo Battiwalla; Michael R Bishop; Sergio A Giralt; Nancy M Hardy; Nicolaus Kröger; Alan S Wayne; Katharine C Hsu Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2013-09-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Heinz Ludwig; Pieter Sonneveld; Faith Davies; Joan Bladé; Mario Boccadoro; Michele Cavo; Gareth Morgan; Javier de la Rubia; Michel Delforge; Meletios Dimopoulos; Hermann Einsele; Thierry Facon; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Philippe Moreau; Hareth Nahi; Torben Plesner; Jesús San-Miguel; Roman Hajek; Pia Sondergeld; Antonio Palumbo Journal: Oncologist Date: 2014-07-25
Authors: Elisabet E Manasanch; Dalia A Salem; Constance M Yuan; Nishant Tageja; Manisha Bhutani; Mary Kwok; Dickran Kazandjian; George Carter; Seth M Steinberg; Diamond Zuchlinski; Marcia Mulquin; Katherine Calvo; Irina Maric; Mark Roschewski; Neha Korde; Raul Braylan; Ola Landgren; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2014-10-30
Authors: Prashant R Tembhare; Constance M Yuan; David Venzon; Raul Braylan; Neha Korde; Elisabet Manasanch; Diamond Zuchlinsky; Katherine Calvo; Roger Kurlander; Manisha Bhutani; Nishant Tageja; Irina Maric; Marcia Mulquin; Mark Roschewski; Mary Kwok; David Liewehr; Ola Landgren; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson Journal: Leuk Res Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 3.156