Literature DB >> 23733779

Fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) versus FAC followed by weekly paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for high-risk, node-negative breast cancer: results from the GEICAM/2003-02 study.

Miguel Martín1, Amparo Ruiz, Manuel Ruiz Borrego, Agustí Barnadas, Sonia González, Lourdes Calvo, Mireia Margelí Vila, Antonio Antón, Alvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Miguel Angel Seguí-Palmer, Montserrat Muñoz-Mateu, Joan Dorca Ribugent, José Manuel López-Vega, Carlos Jara, Enrique Espinosa, César Mendiola Fernández, Raquel Andrés, Nuria Ribelles, Arrate Plazaola, Pedro Sánchez-Rovira, Javier Salvador Bofill, Carmen Crespo, Francisco J Carabantes, Sonia Servitja, José Ignacio Chacón, César A Rodríguez, Blanca Hernando, Isabel Álvarez, Eva Carrasco, Ana Lluch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Adding taxanes to anthracycline-based adjuvant therapy improves survival outcomes of patients with node-positive breast cancer (BC). Currently, however, most patients with BC are node negative at diagnosis. The only pure node-negative study (Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group 9805) reported so far showed a docetaxel benefit but significant toxicity. Here we tested the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel (wP) in node-negative patients, which is yet to be established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with BC having T1-T3/N0 tumors and at least one high-risk factor for recurrence (according to St. Gallen 1998 criteria) were eligible. After primary surgery, 1,925 patients were randomly assigned to receive fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) × 6 or FAC × 4 followed by wP × 8 (FAC-wP). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) after a median follow-up of 5 years. Secondary end points included toxicity and overall survival.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 63.3 months, 93% and 90.3% of patients receiving FAC-wP or FAC regimens, respectively, remained disease free (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.99; log-rank P = .04). Thirty-one patients receiving FAC-wP versus 40 patients receiving FAC died (one and seven from cardiovascular diseases, respectively; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.26; log-rank P = .31). The most relevant grade 3 and 4 adverse events in the FAC-wP versus the FAC arm were febrile neutropenia (2.7% v 3.6%), fatigue (7.9% v 3.4%), and sensory neuropathy (5.5% v 0%).
CONCLUSION: For patients with high-risk node-negative BC, the adjuvant FAC-wP regimen was associated with a small but significant improvement in DFS compared with FAC therapy, in addition to manageable toxicity, especially regarding long-term cardiac effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23733779     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.9841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  28 in total

Review 1.  Adjuvant Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Standard of Care in High-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Volker Möbus
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for early female breast cancer: a systematic review of the evidence for the 2014 Cancer Care Ontario systemic therapy guideline.

Authors:  S Gandhi; G G Fletcher; A Eisen; M Mates; O C Freedman; S F Dent; M E Trudeau
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Randomized sham-controlled pilot trial of weekly electro-acupuncture for the prevention of taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy in women with early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Heather Greenlee; Katherine D Crew; Jillian Capodice; Danielle Awad; Donna Buono; Zaixing Shi; Anne Jeffres; Sharon Wyse; Wendy Whitman; Meghna S Trivedi; Kevin Kalinsky; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Docetaxel-induced Scleroderma in A Breast Cancer Patient: A Case Report.

Authors:  Murat Özgür Kılıç; Metin Yalaza; Celal İsmail Bilgiç; Cenap Dener
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2015-04-01

5.  Adjuvant Metronomic CMF in a Contemporary Breast Cancer Cohort: What's Old Is New.

Authors:  Eunpi Cho; Ann K Schwemm; Lena M Rubinstein; Philip A Stevenson; Ted A Gooley; Georgiana K Ellis; Jennifer M Specht; Robert B Livingston; Hannah M Linden; Vijayakrishna K Gadi
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Effectiveness of an Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Takeo Fujii; Fanny Le Du; Lianchun Xiao; Takahiro Kogawa; Carlos H Barcenas; Ricardo H Alvarez; Vicente Valero; Yu Shen; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  Breast Cancer Patient with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome: A Case Report Highlighting the Importance of Multidisciplinary Management.

Authors:  Beatriz Cirauqui; Teresa Morán; Anna Estival; Vanesa Quiroga; Olatz Etxaniz; Carmen Balana; Matilde Navarro; Salvador Villà; Rosa Ballester; Mireia Margelí
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2020-02-13

8.  Long-Term Follow-Up of the E1199 Phase III Trial Evaluating the Role of Taxane and Schedule in Operable Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; Fengmin Zhao; Silvana Martino; Jennifer A Ligibel; Edith A Perez; Tom Saphner; Antonio C Wolff; George W Sledge; William C Wood; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Taxanes for adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer.

Authors:  Melina L Willson; Lucinda Burke; Thomas Ferguson; Davina Ghersi; Anna K Nowak; Nicholas Wilcken
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-02

Review 10.  Progress in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: an overview.

Authors:  Jesus Anampa; Della Makower; Joseph A Sparano
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.