Literature DB >> 26402167

Effectiveness of an Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Takeo Fujii1, Fanny Le Du2, Lianchun Xiao3, Takahiro Kogawa2, Carlos H Barcenas2, Ricardo H Alvarez2, Vicente Valero2, Yu Shen3, Naoto T Ueno2.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens are available for early-stage breast cancer. Because conventional meta-analysis does not allow comparing all regimens, we performed a network meta-analysis to identify the most effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimen.
OBJECTIVE: To find the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen for early-stage breast cancer. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles published before June 2015; the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting abstracts from January 1983 through December 2014; and the American Association for Cancer Research annual meeting abstracts from January 1916 through December 2014. Additionally, we manually searched bibliographies for related references. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized clinical trials of adjuvant treatments for early-stage breast cancer that compared 2 or more of the following: no adjuvant chemotherapy; sequential anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and taxane (AC-T); concurrent anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and taxane (ACT); anthracycline-cyclophosphamide without taxane (AC); docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC); cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF); and platinum-containing regimens. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We followed the PRISMA guidelines. Two investigators independently selected the articles and extracted information. Disagreements were resolved by discussion with another author. Quality was assessed by Cochrane risk-of-bias method. Data were pooled using random-effects models. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We used network meta-analysis to test the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen in terms of overall survival (OS) by comparing regimens listed in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and platinum-containing regimens.
RESULTS: We identified 24 trials. The TC and platinum-containing regimens had OS benefit similar to that of sequential AC-T (TC hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.62-1.40; and platinum HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.31). Patients treated with CMF or AC had significantly worse OS than those treated with sequential AC-T (CMF HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.32-1.85; and AC HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10-1.37). Platinum-containing regimens tended to be more toxic than sequential AC-T. The toxicity of TC was similar to or less than that of sequential AC-T. Meta-regression analysis showed that hormone receptor status did not impact the HRs for OS for any regimen. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Sequential AC-T is likely to be the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen for early-stage breast cancer regardless of hormone receptor status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26402167      PMCID: PMC5575939          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  48 in total

1.  Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints.

Authors:  M K Parmar; V Torri; L Stewart
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 6.071

3.  Phase III trial comparing two dose levels of epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  M J Piccart; A Di Leo; M Beauduin; A Vindevoghel; J Michel; C Focan; A Tagnon; F Ries; P Gobert; C Finet; M T Closon-Dejardin; J P Dufrane; J Kerger; F Liebens; S Beauvois; S Bartholomeus; S Dolci; J P Lobelle; M Paesmans; J M Nogaret
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  A randomized trial of four cycles of adjuvant AC (adriamycin + cyclophosphamide) +/- two cycles of EP (etoposide + cisplatin) in node positive patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  F Içli; H Akbulut; D Dinçol; H Onur; A Demirkazik; R Cam; F Cay; S Demirci; A Uner; S Erekul
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Improved outcome from substituting methotrexate with epirubicin: results from a randomised comparison of CMF versus CEF in patients with primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Bent Ejlertsen; Henning T Mouridsen; Maj-Britt Jensen; Jørn Andersen; Søren Cold; Per Edlund; Marianne Ewertz; Brita B Jensen; Claus Kamby; Bo Nordenskjold; Jonas Bergh
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Sequential docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive or/and T3 or T4 breast cancer: clinical outcome (Mansoura University).

Authors:  H Sakr; R H Hamed; A H Anter; T Yossef
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Epirubicin-based chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for poor prognosis, node-negative breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of the French Adjuvant Study Group 03 trial.

Authors:  Michel Héry; Jacques Bonneterre; Henri Roché; Elisabeth Luporsi; Pierre Kerbrat; Moïse Namer; Pierre Fumoleau; Alain Monnier; Pierre Fargeot
Journal:  Bull Cancer       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.276

8.  Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

Authors:  M N Levine; V H Bramwell; K I Pritchard; B D Norris; L E Shepherd; H Abu-Zahra; B Findlay; D Warr; D Bowman; J Myles; A Arnold; T Vandenberg; R MacKenzie; J Robert; J Ottaway; M Burnell; C K Williams; D Tu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Phase II study of continuous infusion fluorouracil with epirubicin and cisplatin in patients with metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer: an active new regimen.

Authors:  A L Jones; I E Smith; M E O'Brien; D Talbot; G Walsh; F Ramage; H Robertshaw; S Ashley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Definitive results of a phase III adjuvant trial comparing three chemotherapy regimens in women with operable, node-positive breast cancer: the NSABP B-38 trial.

Authors:  Sandra M Swain; Gong Tang; Charles E Geyer; Priya Rastogi; James N Atkins; Paul P Donnellan; Louis Fehrenbacher; Catherine A Azar; André Robidoux; Jonathan A Polikoff; Adam M Brufsky; David D Biggs; Edward A Levine; John L Zapas; Louise Provencher; Donald W Northfelt; Soonmyung Paik; Joseph P Costantino; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  25 in total

1.  Weekly Paclitaxel-Induced Neurotoxicity in Breast Cancer: Outcomes and Dose Response.

Authors:  Hannah C Timmins; Tiffany Li; Terry Trinh; Matthew C Kiernan; Michelle Harrison; Frances Boyle; Michael Friedlander; David Goldstein; Susanna B Park
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-02-10

2.  Perceptions of vascular access for intravenous systemic therapy and risk factors for lymphedema in early-stage breast cancer-a patient survey.

Authors:  N LeVasseur; C Stober; M Ibrahim; S Gertler; J Hilton; A Robinson; S McDiarmid; D Fergusson; S Mazzarello; B Hutton; A A Joy; M McInnes; M Clemons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Quantitative assessment of breast cancer liver metastasis expansion with patient-derived xenografts.

Authors:  Mohammad A Alzubi; Sahib S Sohal; Madhumitha Sriram; Tia H Turner; Patricija Zot; Michael Idowu; J Chuck Harrell
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  Ceruletide and Alpha-1 Antitrypsin as a Novel Combination Therapy for Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Alba Simats; Laura Ramiro; Raquel Valls; Helena de Ramón; Paula García-Rodríguez; Cyrille Orset; Laura Artigas; Teresa Sardon; Anna Rosell; Joan Montaner
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 6.088

Review 5.  Integrating evolutionary dynamics into cancer therapy.

Authors:  Robert A Gatenby; Joel S Brown
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  A prospective cohort study of early discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer: the breast cancer quality of care study (BQUAL).

Authors:  Alfred I Neugut; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Lawrence H Kushi; Lois Lamerato; Donna L Buono; S David Nathanson; Dana H Bovbjerg; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Wei-Yann Tsai; Judith S Jacobson; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Histologic Discordance Between Primary Tumor and Nodal Metastasis in Breast Cancer: Solving a Clinical Conundrum in the Era of Genomics.

Authors:  Nicole K Yun; Jessica A Slostad; Ankur Naqib; Casey Frankenberger; Claudia B Perez; Ritu Ghai; Lydia Usha
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-09-12

8.  Efficacy of Drug Interventions for Chemotherapy-Induced Chronic Peripheral Neurotoxicity: A Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiying Fu; Huijie Wu; Jinyao Li; Can Wang; Ming Li; Qianqian Ma; Wei Yang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable breast cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Xiu-E Shi; Jin-Hui Tian; Xu-Juan Yang; Yong-Feng Wang; Ke-Hu Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  A Bayesian network meta-analysis of 5 different fusion surgical procedures for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Linjun Tang; Yong Wu; Daping Jing; Yong Xu; Cheng Wang; Jingjing Pan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.