Takeo Fujii1, Fanny Le Du2, Lianchun Xiao3, Takahiro Kogawa2, Carlos H Barcenas2, Ricardo H Alvarez2, Vicente Valero2, Yu Shen3, Naoto T Ueno2. 1. Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston2The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston. 2. Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. 3. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens are available for early-stage breast cancer. Because conventional meta-analysis does not allow comparing all regimens, we performed a network meta-analysis to identify the most effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. OBJECTIVE: To find the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen for early-stage breast cancer. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles published before June 2015; the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting abstracts from January 1983 through December 2014; and the American Association for Cancer Research annual meeting abstracts from January 1916 through December 2014. Additionally, we manually searched bibliographies for related references. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized clinical trials of adjuvant treatments for early-stage breast cancer that compared 2 or more of the following: no adjuvant chemotherapy; sequential anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and taxane (AC-T); concurrent anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and taxane (ACT); anthracycline-cyclophosphamide without taxane (AC); docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC); cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF); and platinum-containing regimens. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We followed the PRISMA guidelines. Two investigators independently selected the articles and extracted information. Disagreements were resolved by discussion with another author. Quality was assessed by Cochrane risk-of-bias method. Data were pooled using random-effects models. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We used network meta-analysis to test the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen in terms of overall survival (OS) by comparing regimens listed in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and platinum-containing regimens. RESULTS: We identified 24 trials. The TC and platinum-containing regimens had OS benefit similar to that of sequential AC-T (TC hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.62-1.40; and platinum HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.31). Patients treated with CMF or AC had significantly worse OS than those treated with sequential AC-T (CMF HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.32-1.85; and AC HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10-1.37). Platinum-containing regimens tended to be more toxic than sequential AC-T. The toxicity of TC was similar to or less than that of sequential AC-T. Meta-regression analysis showed that hormone receptor status did not impact the HRs for OS for any regimen. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Sequential AC-T is likely to be the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen for early-stage breast cancer regardless of hormone receptor status.
IMPORTANCE: Different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens are available for early-stage breast cancer. Because conventional meta-analysis does not allow comparing all regimens, we performed a network meta-analysis to identify the most effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. OBJECTIVE: To find the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen for early-stage breast cancer. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles published before June 2015; the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting abstracts from January 1983 through December 2014; and the American Association for Cancer Research annual meeting abstracts from January 1916 through December 2014. Additionally, we manually searched bibliographies for related references. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized clinical trials of adjuvant treatments for early-stage breast cancer that compared 2 or more of the following: no adjuvant chemotherapy; sequential anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and taxane (AC-T); concurrent anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and taxane (ACT); anthracycline-cyclophosphamide without taxane (AC); docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC); cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF); and platinum-containing regimens. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We followed the PRISMA guidelines. Two investigators independently selected the articles and extracted information. Disagreements were resolved by discussion with another author. Quality was assessed by Cochrane risk-of-bias method. Data were pooled using random-effects models. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We used network meta-analysis to test the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen in terms of overall survival (OS) by comparing regimens listed in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and platinum-containing regimens. RESULTS: We identified 24 trials. The TC and platinum-containing regimens had OS benefit similar to that of sequential AC-T (TC hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.62-1.40; and platinum HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.31). Patients treated with CMF or AC had significantly worse OS than those treated with sequential AC-T (CMF HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.32-1.85; and AC HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10-1.37). Platinum-containing regimens tended to be more toxic than sequential AC-T. The toxicity of TC was similar to or less than that of sequential AC-T. Meta-regression analysis showed that hormone receptor status did not impact the HRs for OS for any regimen. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Sequential AC-T is likely to be the most effective adjuvant therapy regimen for early-stage breast cancer regardless of hormone receptor status.
Authors: M J Piccart; A Di Leo; M Beauduin; A Vindevoghel; J Michel; C Focan; A Tagnon; F Ries; P Gobert; C Finet; M T Closon-Dejardin; J P Dufrane; J Kerger; F Liebens; S Beauvois; S Bartholomeus; S Dolci; J P Lobelle; M Paesmans; J M Nogaret Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-06-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: F Içli; H Akbulut; D Dinçol; H Onur; A Demirkazik; R Cam; F Cay; S Demirci; A Uner; S Erekul Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Bent Ejlertsen; Henning T Mouridsen; Maj-Britt Jensen; Jørn Andersen; Søren Cold; Per Edlund; Marianne Ewertz; Brita B Jensen; Claus Kamby; Bo Nordenskjold; Jonas Bergh Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2007-02-16 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Michel Héry; Jacques Bonneterre; Henri Roché; Elisabeth Luporsi; Pierre Kerbrat; Moïse Namer; Pierre Fumoleau; Alain Monnier; Pierre Fargeot Journal: Bull Cancer Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 1.276
Authors: M N Levine; V H Bramwell; K I Pritchard; B D Norris; L E Shepherd; H Abu-Zahra; B Findlay; D Warr; D Bowman; J Myles; A Arnold; T Vandenberg; R MacKenzie; J Robert; J Ottaway; M Burnell; C K Williams; D Tu Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A L Jones; I E Smith; M E O'Brien; D Talbot; G Walsh; F Ramage; H Robertshaw; S Ashley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1994-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sandra M Swain; Gong Tang; Charles E Geyer; Priya Rastogi; James N Atkins; Paul P Donnellan; Louis Fehrenbacher; Catherine A Azar; André Robidoux; Jonathan A Polikoff; Adam M Brufsky; David D Biggs; Edward A Levine; John L Zapas; Louise Provencher; Donald W Northfelt; Soonmyung Paik; Joseph P Costantino; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-08-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hannah C Timmins; Tiffany Li; Terry Trinh; Matthew C Kiernan; Michelle Harrison; Frances Boyle; Michael Friedlander; David Goldstein; Susanna B Park Journal: Oncologist Date: 2021-02-10
Authors: N LeVasseur; C Stober; M Ibrahim; S Gertler; J Hilton; A Robinson; S McDiarmid; D Fergusson; S Mazzarello; B Hutton; A A Joy; M McInnes; M Clemons Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Mohammad A Alzubi; Sahib S Sohal; Madhumitha Sriram; Tia H Turner; Patricija Zot; Michael Idowu; J Chuck Harrell Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Alba Simats; Laura Ramiro; Raquel Valls; Helena de Ramón; Paula García-Rodríguez; Cyrille Orset; Laura Artigas; Teresa Sardon; Anna Rosell; Joan Montaner Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 6.088
Authors: Alfred I Neugut; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Lawrence H Kushi; Lois Lamerato; Donna L Buono; S David Nathanson; Dana H Bovbjerg; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Wei-Yann Tsai; Judith S Jacobson; Dawn L Hershman Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 4.872