Literature DB >> 23733237

Head-to-head comparison of 1 week versus 6 months CMR-derived infarct size for prediction of late events after STEMI.

Oliver Husser1, Jose V Monmeneu, Clara Bonanad, Cristina Gomez, Fabian Chaustre, Julio Nunez, Maria P Lopez-Lereu, Gema Minana, Juan Sanchis, Luis Mainar, Vicente Ruiz, Maria J Forteza, Isabel Trapero, David Moratal, Francisco J Chorro, Vicente Bodi.   

Abstract

Infarct size (IS) at 1 week after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) diminishes during the first months. The incremental prognostic value of IS regression and of scar size (SS) at 6 months is unknown. We compared cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived IS at 1 week and SS at 6 months after MI for predicting late major adverse cardiac events (MACE). 250 patients underwent CMR at 1 week and 6 months after MI. IS and SS were determined as the extent of transmural late enhancement (in >50 % of wall thickness, ETLE). During 163 weeks, 23 late MACE (cardiac death, MI or readmission for heart failure after the 6 months CMR) occurred. Patients with MACE had a larger IS at 1 week (6 [4-9] vs. 3 [1-5], p < .0001) and a larger SS at 6 months (5 [2-6] vs. 3 [1-5], p = .005) than those without MACE. Late MACE rates in IS >median were higher at 1 week (14 vs. 4 %, p = .007) and in SS >median at 6 months (12 vs. 5 %, p = .053). The C-statistic for predicting late MACE of CMR at 1 week and 6 months was comparable (.720 vs. .746, p = .1). Only ETLE at 1 week (HR 1.31 95 % CI [1.14-1.52], p < .0001, per segment) independently predicted late MACE. CMR-derived SS at 6 months does not offer prognostic value beyond IS at 1 week after MI. The strongest predictor of late MACE is ETLE at 1 week.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23733237     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0239-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  34 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Harvey D White
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Characterization of microvascular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement imaging.

Authors:  Andrew T Yan; C Michael Gibson; Eric Larose; Nagesh S Anavekar; Sui Tsang; Scott D Solomon; Glenn Reynolds; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.364

4.  Magnetic resonance characterization of the peri-infarction zone of reperfused myocardial infarction with necrosis-specific and extracellular nonspecific contrast media.

Authors:  M Saeed; G Lund; M F Wendland; J Bremerich; H Weinmann; C B Higgins
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-02-13       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Quantification and time course of microvascular obstruction by contrast-enhanced echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging following acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion.

Authors:  K C Wu; R J Kim; D A Bluemke; C E Rochitte; E A Zerhouni; L C Becker; J A Lima
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Infarct size by contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance is a stronger predictor of outcomes than left ventricular ejection fraction or end-systolic volume index: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  E Wu; J T Ortiz; P Tejedor; D C Lee; C Bucciarelli-Ducci; P Kansal; J C Carr; T A Holly; D Lloyd-Jones; F J Klocke; R O Bonow
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Infarct resorption, compensatory hypertrophy, and differing patterns of ventricular remodeling following myocardial infarctions of varying size.

Authors:  David S Fieno; Hanns B Hillenbrand; Wolfgang G Rehwald; Kathleen R Harris; Robert S Decker; Michele A Parker; Francis J Klocke; Raymond J Kim; Robert M Judd
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2008 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) and endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).

Authors:  Kenneth Dickstein; Alain Cohen-Solal; Gerasimos Filippatos; John J V McMurray; Piotr Ponikowski; Philip Alexander Poole-Wilson; Anna Strömberg; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Dan Atar; Arno W Hoes; Andre Keren; Alexandre Mebazaa; Markku Nieminen; Silvia Giuliana Priori; Karl Swedberg
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Impact of myocardial haemorrhage on left ventricular function and remodelling in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Javier Ganame; Giancarlo Messalli; Steven Dymarkowski; Frank E Rademakers; Walter Desmet; Frans Van de Werf; Jan Bogaert
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Prognostic value of dipyridamole stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Vicente Bodi; Juan Sanchis; Maria P Lopez-Lereu; Julio Nunez; Luis Mainar; Jose V Monmeneu; Oliver Husser; Eloy Dominguez; Francisco J Chorro; Angel Llacer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging assessment of outcomes in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jamal N Khan; Gerry P McCann
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-26

2.  Evolution of left ventricular function among subjects with ST-elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Ulrika Pahlm; Ellen Ostenfeld; Felicia Seemann; Henrik Engblom; David Erlinge; Einar Heiberg; Håkan Arheden; Marcus Carlsson
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 3.  Clinical imaging in regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Anna V Naumova; Michel Modo; Anna Moore; Charles E Murry; Joseph A Frank
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 68.164

4.  Apoptosis and Mobilization of Lymphocytes to Cardiac Tissue Is Associated with Myocardial Infarction in a Reperfused Porcine Model and Infarct Size in Post-PCI Patients.

Authors:  Maria J Forteza; Isabel Trapero; Arantxa Hervas; Elena de Dios; Amparo Ruiz-Sauri; Gema Minana; Clara Bonanad; Cristina Gómez; Ricardo Oltra; Cesar Rios-Navarro; Daniel F J Ketelhuth; Julio Nunez; Francisco J Chorro; Vicente Bodi
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 5.  Role of cardiac T1 mapping and extracellular volume in the assessment of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Laura C Saunders; Andrew J Swift; Jim M Wild; Sven Plein
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 1.596

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.