Literature DB >> 23732683

Effect of stimulus rise-time on the ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential to bone-conducted vibration.

Ann M Burgess1, Laura E Mezey, Leonardo Manzari, Hamish G MacDougall, Leigh A McGarvie, Ian S Curthoys.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The negative potential at 10 msec (called n10) of the ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) recorded beneath the eyes in response to bone-conducted vibration (BCV) delivered to the skull at the midline in the hairline (Fz) is a new indicator of otolithic, and in particular utricular, function. Our aim is to find the optimum combination of frequency and rise-time for BCV stimulation, to improve the sensitivity of oVEMP testing in the clinic.
DESIGN: We tested 10 healthy subjects with 6 msec tone bursts of BCV at three stimulus frequencies, 250, 500, and 750 Hz, at rise-times ranging between 0 and 2 msec. The BCV was delivered at Fz.
RESULTS: The n10 response was significantly larger at the shorter rise-times, being largest at zero rise-time. In addition, we examined the effect of stimulus frequency in these same subjects by delivering 6 msec tone bursts at zero rise-time at a range of frequencies from 50 to 1200 Hz. The main effect of rise-time was significant with shorter rise-times leading to larger n10 responses and the Rise-Time × Frequency interaction was significant so that at low frequencies (100 Hz) shorter rise-times had a modest effect on n10 whereas at high frequencies (750 Hz) shorter rise-times increased n10 amplitude substantially. The main effect of frequency was also significant: The n10 response tended to be larger at lower frequency, being largest between 250 and 500 Hz.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, in this sample of healthy subjects, the most effective stimulus for eliciting oVEMP n10 to BCV at Fz was found to be a tone burst with a rise-time of 0 msec at low stimulus frequency (250 or 500 Hz).

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23732683     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318294e3d2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  8 in total

Review 1.  How does high-frequency sound or vibration activate vestibular receptors?

Authors:  I S Curthoys; J W Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  The new vestibular stimuli: sound and vibration-anatomical, physiological and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Ian S Curthoys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Using Narrow Band CE-Chirps to Elicit Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials.

Authors:  Quentin Mat; Naïma Deggouj; Jean-Pierre Duterme; Sophie Tainmont; Christophe Lelubre; Mario Manto
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 4.  Otolithic Receptor Mechanisms for Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials: A Review.

Authors:  Ian S Curthoys; J Wally Grant; Ann M Burgess; Chris J Pastras; Daniel J Brown; Leonardo Manzari
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  A Single Fast Test for Semicircular Canal Dehiscence-oVEMP n10 to 4000 Hz-Depends on Stimulus Rise Time.

Authors:  Ian S Curthoys; Ann M Burgess; Leonardo Manzari; Christopher J Pastras
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2022-08-24

Review 6.  Evidence-based diagnostic use of VEMPs : From neurophysiological principles to clinical application.

Authors:  J Dlugaiczyk
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Optimizing Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials With Narrow Band CE-Chirps.

Authors:  Quentin Mat; Jean-Pierre Duterme; Sophie Tainmont; Christophe Lelubre; Mario Manto
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Study on the Perception Mechanism of Utricles Based on Bionic Models.

Authors:  Yani Jiang; Xianjin Wang; Shien Lu; Yongbin Qin; Can He; Yixiang Bian
Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.