Literature DB >> 23732464

Improving quality of care in peptic ulcer bleeding: nationwide cohort study of 13,498 consecutive patients in the Danish Clinical Register of Emergency Surgery.

Steffen J Rosenstock1, Morten H Møller, Heidi Larsson, Søren P Johnsen, Anders H Madsen, Jørgen Bendix, Sven Adamsen, Anders G Jensen, Erik Zimmermann-Nielsen, Ann-Sophie Nielsen, Finn Kallehave, Dorthe Oxholm, Mona Skarbye, Line R Jølving, Henrik S Jørgensen, Ove B Schaffalitzky de Muckadell, Reimar W Thomsen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) is complex, and mortality remains high. We present results from a nationwide initiative to monitor and improve the quality of care (QOC) in PUB.
METHODS: All Danish hospitals treating PUB patients between 2004 and 2011 prospectively registered demographic, clinical, and prognostic data. QOC was evaluated using eight process and outcome indicators, including time to initial endoscopy, hemostasis obtainment, proportion undergoing surgery, rebleeding risks, and 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 13,498 PUB patients (median age 74 years) were included, of which one-quarter were in-hospital bleeders. Preadmission use of anticoagulants, multiple coexisting diseases, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists scores increased between 2004 and 2011. Considerable improvements were observed for most QOC indicators over time. Endoscopic treatment was successful with primary hemostasis achieved in more patients (94% in 2010-2011 vs. 89% in 2004-2006, relative risk (RR) 1.06 (95% confidence intervals 1.04-1.08)), endoscopy delay for hemodynamically unstable patients decreased during this period (43% vs. 34% had endoscopy within 6 h, RR 1.33 (1.10-1.61)), and fewer patients underwent open surgery (4% vs. 6%, RR 0.72 (0.59-0.87)). After controlling for time changes in prognostic factors, rebleeding rates improved (13% vs. 18%, adjusted RR 0.77 (0.66-0.91)). Crude 30-day mortality was unchanged (11% vs. 11%), whereas adjusted mortality decreased nonsignificantly over time (adjusted RR 0.89 (0.78-1.00)).
CONCLUSIONS: QOC in PUB has improved substantially in Denmark, but the 30-day mortality remains high. Future initiatives to improve outcomes may include earlier endoscopy, having fully trained endoscopists on call, and increased focus on managing coexisting disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23732464     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2013.162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  17 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Rebleeding in Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: A Second Look at Second-Look Endoscopy.

Authors:  Stig Borbjerg Laursen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Management and outcome of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs.

Authors:  Sven Pannach; Julia Goetze; Sandra Marten; Thomas Schreier; Luise Tittl; Jan Beyer-Westendorf
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Upper-gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to peptic ulcer disease: incidence and outcomes.

Authors:  Samuel Quan; Alexandra Frolkis; Kaylee Milne; Natalie Molodecky; Hong Yang; Elijah Dixon; Chad G Ball; Robert P Myers; Subrata Ghosh; Robert Hilsden; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten; Gilaad G Kaplan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  How Can Patient's Risk Dictate the Timing of Endoscopy in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?

Authors:  Marta Freitas; Vítor Macedo Silva; Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves; Carla Marinho; José Cotter
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-24

5.  Antroduodenectomy with Gastroduodenal Anastomosis: Salvage Emergency Surgery for Complicated Peptic Ulcer Disease--Results of a Double Institution Study of 35 Patients.

Authors:  Nathalie Chereau; Marie-Maëlle Chandeze; Camille Tantardini; Christophe Trésallet; Jérémie H Lefevre; Yann Parc; Fabrice Menegaux
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to peptic ulcer disease is not associated with air pollution: a case-crossover study.

Authors:  Samuel Quan; Hong Yang; Divine Tanyingoh; Paul J Villeneuve; David M Stieb; Markey Johnson; Robert Hilsden; Karen Madsen; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten; Kerri Novak; Eddy Lang; Subrata Ghosh; Gilaad G Kaplan
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  What is the ideal timing for endoscopy in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding?

Authors:  Alan Barkun
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-05

8.  Management of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Guideline Recommendations From the International Consensus Group.

Authors:  Alan N Barkun; Majid Almadi; Ernst J Kuipers; Loren Laine; Joseph Sung; Frances Tse; Grigorios I Leontiadis; Neena S Abraham; Xavier Calvet; Francis K L Chan; James Douketis; Robert Enns; Ian M Gralnek; Vipul Jairath; Dennis Jensen; James Lau; Gregory Y H Lip; Romaric Loffroy; Fauze Maluf-Filho; Andrew C Meltzer; Nageshwar Reddy; John R Saltzman; John K Marshall; Marc Bardou
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Early esophagogastroduodenoscopy is associated with better Outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a nationwide study.

Authors:  Sushil K Garg; Chimaobi Anugwom; James Campbell; Vaibhav Wadhwa; Nancy Gupta; Rocio Lopez; Sukhman Shergill; Madhusudhan R Sanaka
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-05

10.  Prehospital triage of patients diagnosed with perforated peptic ulcer or peptic ulcer bleeding: an observational study of patients calling 1-1-2.

Authors:  Kasper Bonnesen; Kristian D Friesgaard; Morten T Boetker; Lone Nikolajsen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.