Literature DB >> 23730156

The utility of the microvascular anastomotic coupler in free tissue transfer.

Amandeep S Grewal1, Boban Erovic, Nick Strumas, Danny J Enepekides, Kevin M Higgins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The microvascular anastomosis remains a technically sensitive and critical determinant of success in free tissue transfer. The microvascular anastomotic coupling device is an elegant, friction-fit ring pin device that is becoming more widely used.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature to examine the utility of the microvascular coupler in free tissue transfer.
METHODS: A comprehensive database search was performed to identify eligible publications. Inclusion criteria were anastomotic coupler utilization and free-tissue transfer. Recorded information from eligible studies included patient age, follow-up, radiation history, number of free-flaps and failure rates, reconstruction subsites, number of coupled venous and arterial anastomoses, coupling time, conversion to sutured anastomosis, coupler size and thrombosis rates.
RESULTS: Twenty-five studies reporting on 3207 patients were included in the analysis. A total of 3576 free-flaps were performed within the following subsites: 1103 head and neck, 2094 breast, 300 limb or body, and 79 nonspecified. There were only 26 reported flap failures (0.7%). A total of 3497 venous and 342 arterial coupled anastomoses were performed. The primary outcome measure was thrombosis rates, and there were 61 venous (1.7%) and 12 arterial (3.6%) thromboses reported. Mean coupling time was 5 min, and 30 anastomoses (0.8%) were converted to suture.
CONCLUSION: Flap survival and revision-free application of the microvascular coupler occurred in more than 99% of cases. There is a substantial time savings with coupler use. Venous and arterial thrombosis rates are comparable with the best results achieved by sutured anastomosis and, when used by experienced surgeons, the coupler achieves superior results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Free tissue transfer; Microvascular anastomosis; Ring pin; Venous coupler

Year:  2012        PMID: 23730156      PMCID: PMC3383553          DOI: 10.1177/229255031202000213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Plast Surg        ISSN: 1195-2199


  33 in total

1.  Clinical experience with non-penetrating vascular clips in free-flap reconstructions.

Authors:  C Zeebregts; R Acosta; L Bölander; R van Schilfgaarde; O Jakobsson
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2002-03

2.  On "Management of significant venous discrepancy with microvascular venous coupler" (J Reconstr Microsurgery 2003;19:377-380).

Authors:  Geoffrey G Hallock; David C Rice
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.873

3.  Institutional review of free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark A K Knight; Dinh T Nguyen; Mark R Kobayashi; Gregory R D Evans
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Clinical experience of a microvascular venous coupler device in free tissue transfers.

Authors:  Kao-Ping Chang; Sin-Daw Lin; Chung-Sheng Lai
Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.744

5.  Delayed removal of 3M vein coupler does not disturb the anastomosis.

Authors:  Stuart Hilliard; Rodney Pommier; Joel S Solomon
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.425

6.  Microsurgical reconstruction of the lower extremity using the 3M microvascular coupling device in venous anastomoses.

Authors:  M J Denk; M T Longaker; A L Basner; P M Glat; N S Karp; A K Kasabian
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Coupling the venous anastomosis: safe and simple.

Authors:  H P de Bruijn; K W Marck
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.425

8.  Clinical experience with the 3M microvascular coupling anastomotic device in 100 free-tissue transfers.

Authors:  C Y Ahn; W W Shaw; S Berns; B L Markowitz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  500 Consecutive patients with free TRAM flap breast reconstruction: a single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Stephen Vega; James M Smartt; Shao Jiang; Jesse C Selber; Christopher J M Brooks; H Raul Herrera; Joseph M Serletti
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  End-to-side venous anastomosis with an anastomotic coupling device for microvascular free-tissue transfer in head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  Natalya Chernichenko; Douglas A Ross; Joseph Shin; Clarence T Sasaki; Stephen Ariyan
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  11 in total

1.  Influence of coupler size on revision rate and timing of revision after free flap tissue transfer in the head and neck.

Authors:  Ulrich Kisser; Christine Adderson-Kisser; Philipp Baumeister; Maximilian Reiter
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Venous Thrombosis in Handsewn versus Coupled Venous Anastomoses in 857 Consecutive Breast Free Flaps.

Authors:  Anita R Kulkarni; Babak J Mehrara; Andrea L Pusic; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros; Colleen M McCarthy; Joseph J Disa
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.873

Review 3.  Israeli Innovations in the Field of Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Lior Har-Shai; Sar-El Ofek; Stav Cohen; Keren H Cohen; Dafna Shilo Yaacobi; Asaf Olshinka; Rami P Dibbs; Dean D Ad-El
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 2.195

4.  Three routine free flaps per day in a single operating theatre: principles of a process mapping approach to improving surgical efficiency.

Authors:  Dan Marsh; Nakul Gamanlal Patel; Warren Matthew Rozen; Muhammed Chowdhry; Hrsikesa Sharma; Venkat V Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

5.  Exposure of a microvascular anastomotic coupler in head and neck reconstruction: a case report.

Authors:  Tateki Kubo; Natsuko Kitamura; Motohiro Onoda; Daisuke Maeda; Ken Matsuda; Ko Hosokawa
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2014-04-09

6.  Protocol for a systematic review of venous coupler devices versus hand-sewn anastomosis for microsurgical free flap reconstruction.

Authors:  Timo Rodi; Alexander Geierlehner; Afshin Mosahebi; Grigorios Tanos; Justin Conrad Rosen Wormald
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-13

7.  Venous Coupler in Pediatric Free Tissue Transfer: Case Series and Literature Review.

Authors:  Salah Aldekhayel; Feras Alshomer; Bushra Alhazmi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-02-26

8.  Postoperative management of antithrombotic medication in microvascular head and neck reconstruction: a comparative analysis of unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin.

Authors:  Matti Sievert; Miguel Goncalves; Rosalie Tamse; Sarina K Mueller; Michael Koch; Antoniu-Oreste Gostian; Heinrich Iro; Claudia Scherl
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  The effect of CT angiography and venous couplers on surgery duration in microvascular breast reconstruction: a single operator's experience.

Authors:  Ledibabari Mildred Ngaage; Georgette Oni; Bruno Di Pace; Raed Rafat Hamed; Laura Fopp; Brendan Chuj Koo; Charles Musonda Malata
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-10

Review 10.  Anticoagulants and Statins As Pharmacological Agents in Free Flap Surgery: Current Rationale.

Authors:  Adnan Pršić; Elizabeth Kiwanuka; Stephanie A Caterson; Edward J Caterson
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2015-11-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.