Literature DB >> 23729966

Site-specific variance in radius and tibia bone strength as determined by muscle size and body mass.

Andrew William Frank1, Megan Crystal Labas, James Duncan Johnston, Saija Annukka Kontulainen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the predictive ability of muscle cross-sectional area (MCSA) and body mass on bone mineral content, compressive bone strength index (BSIc), and the polar stress-strain index (SSIp) of the forearms and lower legs of middle-aged adults.
METHODS: A total of 53 healthy adults (37 male, 16 female; mean age 50.4; SD 2.1 y) were scanned with peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) to measure radius and tibia total and cortical bone mineral content, BSIc, SSIp, and forearm and lower-leg MCSA (BSIc: 4% distal; SSIp and MCSA at 65% and 66% radius and tibia shaft sites, respectively). Multiple regression models adjusted for sex and height were used to assess the relative variance in radius or tibia bone outcomes predicted by body mass and/or forearm or lower-leg MCSA.
RESULTS: Forearm MCSA independently predicted total bone-mineral content, BSIc, and SSIp in radius (r partial=0.59, 0.56, 0.42). Body mass was a negative predictor of radius BSIc (r partial=-0.32) and did not predict other radius outcomes when both body mass and MCSA were forced in the models. In the lower leg shaft, MCSA, and body mass predicted bone content and strength similarly when independently added to the models with sex and height.
CONCLUSIONS: Forearm MCSA was a dominant predictor of radius bone content and estimated strength. In the tibia, both body mass and lower-leg MCSA contributed to predicting bone content and estimated strength.

Entities:  

Keywords:  X-ray computed; body weight; bone and bones; muscle; radius; skeletal; tibia; tomography scanners

Year:  2012        PMID: 23729966      PMCID: PMC3396580          DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2010-40BH

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Can        ISSN: 0300-0508            Impact factor:   1.037


  50 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian aging and the perimenopausal transition: the paradox of endogenous ovarian hyperstimulation.

Authors:  Jerilynn C Prior
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Genetic and environmental influence on structural strength of weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing bone: a twin study.

Authors:  Tuija M Mikkola; Sarianna Sipilä; Taina Rantanen; Harri Sievänen; Harri Suominen; Jaakko Kaprio; Markku Koskenvuo; Markku Kauppinen; Ari Heinonen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Biomechanics of the hip and birth in early Homo.

Authors:  C B Ruff
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.868

4.  The Mediterranean Osteoporosis (MEDOS) Study questionnaire.

Authors:  J Dequeker; J Ranstam; J Valsson; B Sigurgevisson; E Allander
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  The use of magnetic resonance images to investigate the influence of recruitment on the relationship between torque and cross-sectional area in human muscle.

Authors:  H Akima; S Kuno; H Takahashi; T Fukunaga; S Katsuta
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Rehabilitation for distal radial fractures in adults.

Authors:  H H G Handoll; R Madhok; T E Howe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

7.  Gender-related differences in the relationship between densitometric values of whole-body bone mineral content and lean body mass in humans between 2 and 87 years of age.

Authors:  J L Ferretti; R F Capozza; G R Cointry; S L García; H Plotkin; M L Alvarez Filgueira; J R Zanchetta
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  A DXA study of muscle-bone relationships in the whole body and limbs of 2512 normal men and pre- and post-menopausal women.

Authors:  R F Capozza; G R Cointry; P Cure-Ramírez; J L Ferretti; C Cure-Cure
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Bone structure and volumetric BMD in overweight children: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Rachel J Wetzsteon; Moira A Petit; Heather M Macdonald; Julie M Hughes; Thomas J Beck; Heather A McKay
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Muscle loss and bone loss: master and slave?

Authors:  Alexander G Robling
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  6 in total

1.  Associations Between Lean Mass, Muscle Strength and Power, and Skeletal Size, Density and Strength in Older Men.

Authors:  Didier Chalhoub; Robert Boudreau; Susan Greenspan; Anne B Newman; Joseph Zmuda; Andrew W Frank-Wilson; Nayana Nagaraj; Andrew R Hoffman; Nancy E Lane; Marcia L Stefanick; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Tien Dam; Peggy M Cawthon; Eric S Orwoll; Jane A Cauley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Peak power and body mass as predictors of tibial bone strength in healthy male and female adults.

Authors:  Andrew T Denys; Jastine C Bugayong; Candace C Juhala; Eric J Ma; Katelyn E Carvalho; Sarah M Kwong; Vanessa R Yingling
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 1.864

3.  Lower-extremity muscle atrophy and fat infiltration after chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  C D Moore; B C Craven; L Thabane; A C Laing; A W Frank-Wilson; S A Kontulainen; A Papaioannou; J D Adachi; L M Giangregorio
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 4.  Ethical framework of assistive devices: review and reflection.

Authors:  Nazanin Mansouri; Khaled Goher; Seyed Ebrahim Hosseini
Journal:  Robotics Biomim       Date:  2017-11-15

5.  Patella bone density is lower in knee osteoarthritis patients experiencing moderate-to-severe pain at rest.

Authors:  W Burnett; S Kontulainen; C McLennan; D Hazel; C Talmo; D Hunter; D Wilson; J Johnston
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.041

6.  Proximal tibial trabecular bone mineral density is related to pain in patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Wadena D Burnett; Saija A Kontulainen; Christine E McLennan; Diane Hazel; Carl Talmo; David R Wilson; David J Hunter; James D Johnston
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 5.156

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.