Literature DB >> 15207769

A DXA study of muscle-bone relationships in the whole body and limbs of 2512 normal men and pre- and post-menopausal women.

R F Capozza1, G R Cointry, P Cure-Ramírez, J L Ferretti, C Cure-Cure.   

Abstract

A whole-body DXA study of 1450 healthy Caucasian individuals [Bone 22 (1998) 683] found that mineral mass, either crude (BMC) or statistically adjusted to fat mass (FM-adjusted BMC), correlated linearly with lean mass (LM, proportional to muscle mass). The results showed similar slopes but decreasing intercepts (ordinate values) in the order: pre-MP women > men > post-MP women > children. This supports the hypothesis that sex hormones influence the control of bone status by muscle strength in all species. Now we further study those relationships in 2512 healthy Hispanic adults (307 men, 753 pre-MP women, 1452 post-MP women), including separate determinations in their upper and lower limbs. The slopes of the BMC or FM-adjusted BMC vs. LM relationships were parallel in all the studied regions. However, region-related differences were found between the ordinates of the curves. In the whole body, the crude-BMC/LM relationships showed the same ordinate differences as previously observed. In the lower limbs, those differences were smaller in magnitude but highly significant, showing the order: pre-MP women > men = post-MP women. In the upper limbs, the decreasing ordinate order was: men > pre-MP women > post-MP women. After fat adjustment of the BMC, order in both limbs was: men > pre-MP women > post-MP women. Parallelism of the curves was maintained in all cases. LM had a larger independent influence on these results than FM, body weight, or age. The parallelism of the curves supports the idea that a common biomechanical control of bones by muscles occurs in humans. Results suggest that sex-hormone-associated differences in DXA-assessed muscle-bone proportionality in humans could vary according to the region studied. This could be related to the different weight-bearing nature of the musculoskeletal structures studied. Besides the obvious anthropometric associations, FM would exert a mechanical effect as a component of body weight, evident in the lower limbs, while muscle contractions would induce a more significant, dynamical effect in both lower and upper limbs. Muscles seem to exert a larger influence than FM, body weight, and age on BMC in the whole body and lower limbs, regardless of the gender and reproductive status of the individual. The muscle-bone relationships studied may provide a rationale for a future differential diagnosis between disuse-related and other types of osteopenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15207769     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  21 in total

1.  Muscular development and physical activity as major determinants of femoral bone mass acquisition during growth.

Authors:  G Vicente-Rodriguez; I Ara; J Perez-Gomez; C Dorado; J A L Calbet
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  The relationship between body composition and bone mineral content: threshold effects in a racially and ethnically diverse group of men.

Authors:  T G Travison; A B Araujo; G R Esche; J B McKinlay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Bone mineral density and leg muscle strength in young Caucasian, Hispanic, and Asian women.

Authors:  Michael T C Liang; Stanley Bassin; Darren Dutto; William Braun; Nathan Wong; Andria M Pontello; Dan M Cooper; Sara B Arnaud
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Site-specific variance in radius and tibia bone strength as determined by muscle size and body mass.

Authors:  Andrew William Frank; Megan Crystal Labas; James Duncan Johnston; Saija Annukka Kontulainen
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  Lean mass and not fat mass is associated with male proximal femur strength.

Authors:  Thomas G Travison; Andre B Araujo; Gretchen R Esche; Thomas J Beck; John B McKinlay
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Sarcopenia in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with osteopenia, osteoporosis and normal bone mineral density.

Authors:  Marianne C Walsh; Gary R Hunter; Margaret Barbara Livingstone
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-07-02       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Imaging of the muscle-bone relationship.

Authors:  Alex Ireland; José Luis Ferretti; Jörn Rittweger
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Reference charts for the relationships between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-assessed bone mineral content and lean mass in 3,063 healthy men and premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Carlos Cure-Cure; Ricardo F Capozza; Gustavo R Cointry; Margarita Meta; Pablo Cure-Ramírez; José L Ferretti
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Relationship between body composition, body mass index and bone mineral density in a large population of normal, osteopenic and osteoporotic women.

Authors:  A Andreoli; A Bazzocchi; M Celi; D Lauro; R Sorge; U Tarantino; G Guglielmi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Mid-thigh cortical bone structural parameters, muscle mass and strength, and association with lower limb fractures in older men and women (AGES-Reykjavik Study).

Authors:  Fjola Johannesdottir; Thor Aspelund; Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Brynjolfur Y Jonsson; Brynjolfur Mogensen; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur G Gudnason; Thomas F Lang; Gunnar Sigurdsson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.