Literature DB >> 23729412

The use of imaging for electrophysiological and devices procedures: a report from the first European Heart Rhythm Association Policy Conference, jointly organized with the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), the Council of Cardiovascular Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology.

Carina Blomström Lundqvist1, Angelo Auricchio, Josep Brugada, Giuseppe Boriani, Jens Bremerich, Jose Angel Cabrera, Herbert Frank, Matthias Gutberlet, Hein Heidbuchel, Karl-Heinz Kuck, Patrizio Lancellotti, Frank Rademakers, Gerard Winkels, Christian Wolpert, Panos E Vardas.   

Abstract

Implantations of cardiac devices therapies and ablation procedures frequently depend on accurate and reliable imaging modalities for pre-procedural assessments, intra-procedural guidance, detection of complications, and the follow-up of patients. An understanding of echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear cardiology, X-ray computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and vascular ultrasound is indispensable for cardiologists, electrophysiologists as well as radiologists, and it is currently recommended that physicians should be trained in several imaging modalities. There are, however, no current guidelines or recommendations by electrophysiologists, cardiac imaging specialists, and radiologists, on the appropriate use of cardiovascular imaging for selected patient indications, which needs to be addressed. A Policy Conference on the use of imaging in electrophysiology and device management, with representatives from different expert areas of radiology and electrophysiology and commercial developers of imaging and device technologies, was therefore jointly organized by European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), the Council of Cardiovascular Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR). The objectives were to assess the state of the level of evidence and a first step towards a consensus document for currently employed imaging techniques to guide future clinical use, to elucidate the issue of reimbursement structures and health economy, and finally to define the need for appropriate educational programmes to ensure clinical competence for electrophysiologists, imaging specialists, and radiologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23729412     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  10 in total

1.  Cost analysis of periprocedural imaging in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Sean D Pokorney; Bradley G Hammill; Laura G Qualls; Benjamin A Steinberg; Lesley H Curtis; Jonathan P Piccini
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  Interventional CMR: Clinical applications and future directions.

Authors:  Toby Rogers; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Periprocedural imaging and outcomes after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Benjamin A Steinberg; Bradley G Hammill; James P Daubert; Tristram D Bahnson; Pamela S Douglas; Laura G Qualls; Sean D Pokorney; Hugh Calkins; Lesley H Curtis; Jonathan P Piccini
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Cardiac Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Predict the Absence of Intracardiac Thrombus in Anticoagulated Patients Undergoing Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Authors:  Fatima Zaraket; Deva Bas; Jesus Jimenez; Benjamin Casteigt; Begoña Benito; Julio Martí-Almor; Javi Conejos; Helena Tizón-Marcos; Diana Mojón; Ermengol Vallès
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Validation of the mapping accuracy of a novel non-invasive epicardial and endocardial electrophysiology system.

Authors:  Amiran S Revishvili; Erik Wissner; Dmitry S Lebedev; Christine Lemes; Sebastian Deiss; Andreaas Metzner; Vitaly V Kalinin; Oleg V Sopov; Eugeny Z Labartkava; Alexander V Kalinin; Michail Chmelevsky; Stephan V Zubarev; Maria K Chaykovskaya; Mikhail G Tsiklauri; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 6.  Effects of fibrosis morphology on reentrant ventricular tachycardia inducibility and simulation fidelity in patient-derived models.

Authors:  Jordan Ringenberg; Makarand Deo; David Filgueiras-Rama; Gonzalo Pizarro; Borja Ibañez; Rafael Peinado; José L Merino; Omer Berenfeld; Vijay Devabhaktuni
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-25

7.  Cardiovascular Multimodality Imaging: It is Time to Get on Board! A "Società Italiana di Ecocardiografia e CardioVascular Imaging" Statement.

Authors:  Francesco Antonini-Canterin; Giorgio Faganello; Antonio Mantero; Rodolfo Citro; Paolo Colonna; Mauro Giorgi; Vincenzo Manuppelli; Ines Monte; Licia Petrella; Alfredo Posteraro; Vitantonio Di Bello; Scipione Carerj; Frank Benedetto
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Echogr       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

Review 8.  Into a Fluoroless Future: an Appraisal of Fluoroscopy-Free Techniques in Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Christopher S Purtell; Ryan T Kipp; Lee L Eckhardt
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Automatic Detection of Slow Conducting Channels during Substrate Ablation of Scar-Related Ventricular Arrhythmias.

Authors:  Alejandro Alcaine; Beatriz Jáuregui; David Soto-Iglesias; Juan Acosta; Diego Penela; Juan Fernández-Armenta; Markus Linhart; David Andreu; Lluís Mont; Pablo Laguna; Oscar Camara; Juan Pablo Martínez; Antonio Berruezo
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  High-energy external defibrillation and transcutaneous pacing during MRI: feasibility and safety.

Authors:  Vladimir Shusterman; Denice Hodgson-Zingman; Daniel Thedens; Xiaodong Zhu; Stacy Hoffman; Jessica C Sieren; Gina M Morgan; Anthony Faranesh; Barry London
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.364

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.