Literature DB >> 23728589

Comorbidity and survival of patients selected for radical prostatectomy at an age of 75 years or older.

Michael Froehner1, Rainer Koch, Manfred P Wirth.   

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy in elderly patients is controversial. To identify very old candidates for radical prostatectomy with the highest probability of long-term survival, we studied 47 consecutive men who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1992 and 2005 at an age of 75 years or older. A heuristic approach was used to search for subgroups with particularly high long-term survival. Several two-sided comorbidity measures and combinations of these measures were investigated to find classifications best identifying healthy, long-living elderly candidates for radical prostatectomy. Four of the 25 two-sided comorbidity classifications or combinations reached the significance level with hazard ratios between 4.00 and 4.80. After 10 years, patients identified as healthy patients according to these comorbidity measurements had exhibited relative survival rates between 129% and 137% and overall survival rates between 86% and 95%, whereas those with comorbidities had exhibited relative survival rates of only 66%-84% and overall survival rates of 44%-58%. In conclusion, classifying comorbidity may identify a meaningful proportion of men selected for radical prostatectomy at an age of 75 years or older with an excellent long-term survival probability superseding that of the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23728589      PMCID: PMC3881651          DOI: 10.1038/aja.2013.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Androl        ISSN: 1008-682X            Impact factor:   3.285


  13 in total

1.  Impact of comorbidity on treatment and prognosis of prostate cancer patients: a population-based study.

Authors:  S Houterman; M L G Janssen-Heijnen; A J M Hendrikx; H A van den Berg; J W W Coebergh
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 6.312

2.  Comorbidity and competing risks for mortality in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy J Daskivich; Karim Chamie; Lorna Kwan; Jessica Labo; Atreya Dash; Sheldon Greenfield; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Patient selection essential in optimizing the benefit of radical prostatectomy for patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew J Resnick; Thomas J Guzzo
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Mirja Ruutu; Hans Garmo; Jennifer R Stark; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Stefan Bratell; Anders Spångberg; Juni Palmgren; Gunnar Steineck; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Comparison of survival rates for abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment methods.

Authors:  Irene Hinterseher; Herold Kuffner; Rainer Koch; Gabor Gäbel; Hans D Saeger; Diane Smelser
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Radical prostatectomy for octogenarians: how old is too old?

Authors:  R Houston Thompson; Jeffrey M Slezak; W Scott Webster; Michael M Lieber
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Poor overall survival in septa- and octogenarian patients after radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a population-based study of 6183 men.

Authors:  Claudio Jeldres; Nazareno Suardi; Jochen Walz; Fred Saad; Georg C Hutterer; Naeem Bhojani; Shahrokh F Shariat; Paul Perrotte; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  A nomogram predicting 10-year life expectancy in candidates for radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jochen Walz; Andrea Gallina; Fred Saad; Francesco Montorsi; Paul Perrotte; Shahrokh F Shariat; Claudio Jeldres; Markus Graefen; Francois Bénard; Michael McCormack; Luc Valiquette; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Nomogram underestimates 10-year survival in healthy men selected for radical prostatectomy at age 70 years or older.

Authors:  Michael Froehner; Rainer Koch; Rainer J Litz; Manfred P Wirth
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  1 in total

1.  Screening and efficacy of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael Froehner
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.285

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.