| Literature DB >> 23728320 |
Ryouhei Yoshihara1, Shigeki Nozawa, Yoshihiro Hase, Issay Narumi, Jun Hidema, Ayako N Sakamoto.
Abstract
To assess the mutational effects of radiation on vigorously proliferating plant tissue, the mutation spectrum was analyzed with Arabidopsis seedlings using the plasmid-rescue method. Transgenic plants containing the Escherichia coli rpsL gene were irradiated with γ-rays and carbon ion beams (320-MeV (12)C(6+)), and mutations in the rpsL gene were analyzed. Mutant frequency increased significantly following irradiation by γ-rays, but not by 320-MeV (12)C(6+). Mutation spectra showed that both radiations increased the frequency of frameshifts and other mutations, including deletions and insertions, but only γ-rays increased the frequency of total base substitutions. These results suggest that the type of DNA lesions which cause base substitutions were less often induced by 320-MeV (12)C(6+) than by γ-rays in Arabidopsis seedlings. Furthermore, γ-rays never increased the frequencies of G:C to T:A or A:T to C:G transversions, which are caused by oxidized guanine; 320-MeV (12)C(6+), however, produced a slight increase in both transversions. Instead, γ-rays produced a significant increase in the frequency of G:C to A:T transitions. These results suggest that 8-oxoguanine has little effect on mutagenesis in Arabidopsis cells.Entities:
Keywords: Arabidopsis; mutation spectrum; rpsL gene; γ-rays; carbon ion beams
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23728320 PMCID: PMC3823791 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrt074
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Radiat Res ISSN: 0449-3060 Impact factor: 2.724
Fig. 1.Radiation sensitivity of rpsL-transgenic Arabidopsis. The effect of γ-rays (open circles) and 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams (filled circles) on the growth of Arabidopsis leaves. Radiation sensitivity is shown as the relative leaf size of irradiated plants to that of the unirradiated control plants. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean.
Mutant frequencies induced by γ-rays and 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams
| Mutant clonea | Total clonea (×105) | Mutant frequencyb (×10−5) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | 33 | 9.2 | 3.4 ± 0.8 |
| γ-rays | 44 | 3.6 | 14 ± 7* |
| 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams | 27 | 3.3 | 10 ± 12 |
aSum of 5–10 independent experiments. bAverage of 5–10 independent experiments with SD. *Statistically significant compared to unirradiated (‘background’) plants (P < 0.01).
Fig. 2.Frequency of mutations classified into three categories. The frequency of mutations was calculated from the ratio of mutant clone numbers to predicted total analyzed clone numbers. Frameshifts include one base insertion, one base deletion, and deletion of two contiguous bases. Others are a deletion or insertion of ≥3 bases, plural base substitutions, base substitution accompanied by a frameshift, and deletion accompanied by an insertion. *Statistically significant compared with unirradiated (‘background’) plants according to the Poisson test (P < 0.01).
Mutation spectra of Arabidopsis seedlings following ionizing radiation
| Background | γ-rays | 320-MeV 12C6+ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | MF (×10−5) | NM | MF (×10−5) | NM | MF (×10−5) | |
| Transition | ||||||
| G → A | 9 | (1.0) | 11 | (3.1)* | 2 | (0.6) |
| A → G | 1 | (0.1) | 0 | (<0.3) | 0 | (<0.3) |
| Transversion | ||||||
| G → T | 1 | (0.1) | 2 | (0.6) | 3 | (0.9)* |
| G → C | 3 | (0.3) | 2 | (0.6) | 2 | (0.6) |
| A → T | 3 | (0.3) | 4 | (1.1)** | 0 | (<0.3) |
| A → C | 0 | (<0.1) | 1 | (0.3) | 2 | (0.6)* |
| Frameshifts | ||||||
| +1 | 0 | (<0.1) | 1 | (0.3) | 1 | (0.3) |
| –1 | 8 | (0.9) | 9 | (2.5)* | 8 | (2.4)* |
| –2 | 0 | (<0.1) | 2 | (0.6)* | 0 | (<0.3) |
| Deletion | 8 | (0.9) | 9 | (2.5)* | 6 | (1.8)** |
| Complex | 0 | (< 0.1) | 3 | (0.8)* | 3 | (0.9)* |
| Total | 33 | (3.6) | 44 | (12.4) | 27 | (8.2) |
Mutant frequency is derived from the ratio of mutant clone numbers to predicted total analyzed clone numbers. NM = number of mutants, MF = mutant frequency. The statistical significance of differences between the irradiated group and the unirradiated (‘background’) group was examined using the Poisson test (*P < 0.01, **P < 0.05).