Literature DB >> 23728320

Mutational effects of γ-rays and carbon ion beams on Arabidopsis seedlings.

Ryouhei Yoshihara1, Shigeki Nozawa, Yoshihiro Hase, Issay Narumi, Jun Hidema, Ayako N Sakamoto.   

Abstract

To assess the mutational effects of radiation on vigorously proliferating plant tissue, the mutation spectrum was analyzed with Arabidopsis seedlings using the plasmid-rescue method. Transgenic plants containing the Escherichia coli rpsL gene were irradiated with γ-rays and carbon ion beams (320-MeV (12)C(6+)), and mutations in the rpsL gene were analyzed. Mutant frequency increased significantly following irradiation by γ-rays, but not by 320-MeV (12)C(6+). Mutation spectra showed that both radiations increased the frequency of frameshifts and other mutations, including deletions and insertions, but only γ-rays increased the frequency of total base substitutions. These results suggest that the type of DNA lesions which cause base substitutions were less often induced by 320-MeV (12)C(6+) than by γ-rays in Arabidopsis seedlings. Furthermore, γ-rays never increased the frequencies of G:C to T:A or A:T to C:G transversions, which are caused by oxidized guanine; 320-MeV (12)C(6+), however, produced a slight increase in both transversions. Instead, γ-rays produced a significant increase in the frequency of G:C to A:T transitions. These results suggest that 8-oxoguanine has little effect on mutagenesis in Arabidopsis cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arabidopsis; mutation spectrum; rpsL gene; γ-rays; carbon ion beams

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23728320      PMCID: PMC3823791          DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrt074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


INTRODUCTION

The biological effect of ionizing radiation has been studied in bacteria and animals over many decades. Ion beams and γ-rays are utilized as models of high-linear energy transfer (LET) and low-LET radiation, respectively, to study the biological effects from various radiations. It is known that high-LET radiations tend to confer greater biological effects (such as cell-killing and mutagenesis) than low-LET radiations [1-3]. It is thought that the greater cell-killing effects of high LET radiation are due to the formation of double-strand breaks (DSBs) and clustered DNA damage, which are deleterious for organisms [4, 5]. Mutations induced by high- and low-LET radiations are also of different types. It has been reported for mammalian cells that ion beams induce large-sized deletions and insertions, and chromosomal rearrangements, whereas γ-rays induce shorter deletions and insertions, and more frequent base substitutions [3]. Several studies have reported that high-LET radiations confer greater and more distinctive biological effects on plant cells than low-LET radiations. For instance, high-LET radiations produce a more lethal effect on Arabidopsis and tobacco cells [6-9]. As for the types of mutation, irradiation of Arabidopsis dry seeds by carbon ion beams induces point-like mutations (base substitutions and several-base deletions/insertions) and chromosomal rearrangements with similar frequencies, whereas electron beams, one of the low-LET forms of radiation, predominantly induce point-like mutations [10, 11]. Furthermore, genomic in situ hybridization in wheat has shown that ion beams induce chromosomal rearrangements more frequently than X-rays [12]. Recently, Hase et al. (2012) showed that high-LET ion beams induce DSBs that are seldom repaired by the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway in Arabidopsis dry seed [13]. These results suggest that the significant biological effects of high-LET radiation on plants seem to be due to differences in DNA damage, as reported in other organisms. In general, ionizing radiation predominantly induces the formation of radicals by water radiolysis, and these then attack DNA and produce oxidative damage. The formation of 8-oxogunanine is one of the major forms of radiation-induced oxidative damage in animal and bacterial cells, and it is believed to induce major base substitutions involving G:C to T:A and A:T to C:G transversions [14]. The oxidative DNA damage causes mispairings during DNA replication [15]. In a prior study, we irradiated Arabidopsis dry seeds with carbon ion beams and γ-rays to analyze radiation-induced mutation in Arabidopsis somatic cells. Our results showed no significant increase of G:C to T:A or A:T to C:G transversions with either type of radiation, suggesting the low effect of 8-oxoguanine in Arabidopsis dry seeds [16]. This may be because the low water content and/or low cell proliferation activity in dry seed help to avoid the effect of 8-oxoguanine and other oxidative damage. In this study, we analyzed the mutations induced by carbon ion beams (320-MeV 12C6+) and γ-rays in Arabidopsis seedlings. This is the first report detecting radiation-induced mutations in vigorous plant cells with high water content and high cell proliferation activity. Our results provide an important insight for evaluation of the mutational effects of ionizing radiation on plant systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant and bacterial strains

For mutation spectrum analysis, we used transgenic Arabidopsis containing the E. coli rpsL gene integrated into the chromosomal DNA [17]. Mutations occurring in the rpsL gene were detected by means of the plasmid-rescue technique. E. coli strain DH10B [F− mcrA Δ(mrr-hsdRMS-mcrBC) φ80d lacZΔM15 ΔlacX74 deoR recA1 endA1 araD139 Δ(ara leu)7697 galU galK rpsL nupG λ−] carrying the supF-containing plasmid pFSE101 (DH10B/pFSE101) was used for the screening of rpsL mutant clones [18].

Ionizing radiation

Transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings were irradiated with carbon ion (12C6+) beams generated using an azimuthally varying field (AVF) cyclotron and 60Co γ-rays (Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Takasaki, Gunma, Japan). The energy of a carbon ion beam was 320-MeV (26.7 MeV/u) and the average LET was 86.2 keV/μm, which was calculated using the ELOSSM code, a program used to calculate the energy loss of heavy ions under practical irradiation conditions [19].

Plant cultivation and irradiation

The rpsL-transgenic plants were sown on 1/2 B5 medium (1/2 × Gamborg's B5 salts, 1/1000 × hyponex, 1% sucrose, 0.7% agar) aseptically. After a three-day 4°C treatment, plants were grown at 23°C under a 16-h light and 8-h dark cycle for 7 days. For mutation spectrum analysis, 7-day-old plants were irradiated with carbon ions or γ-rays. Irradiated plants were grown under the same conditions for another 7 days and used for mutation analysis.

Sensitivity to ionizing radiation

Sensitivity to ionizing radiation was evaluated by measuring the area of the fifth leaf of irradiated 14-day-old plants. The leaves were mounted on a paper and the leaf area was measured using Adobe Photoshop Elements 4.0 software (Adobe systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). Radiation sensitivity was determined as the relative leaf size of irradiated leaves to that of non-irradiated control leaves. Sensitivity curves fitted using a least-square method were defined by the following equation: where D, D and m indicate the dose, the dose conferring a 37% sensitivity rate (mean lethal dose), and the extrapolated number (the number of targets), respectively.

Mutation analysis

We used ∼270 plants per experimental plot. The experiment was repeated at least five times. Chromosomal DNA was isolated by the CTAB method [20]. Approximately 80 µg of DNA was digested with 20 units of BamHI (Takara Bio, Otsu, Shiga, Japan) in a 400-μl reaction mixture. Digested DNA was purified by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. The DNA was self-ligated in an 800-μl reaction mixture containing 11 Weiss units of T4 DNA ligase (Takara Bio). Reconstructed plasmid purified by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation was electroporated into E. coli DH10B/pFSE101. To select clones carrying a mutated rpsL gene, this E. coli was screened on agar medium containing 100 µg/ml of kanamycin (Km) and 60 µg/ml of streptomycin (Sm). The number of total clones was determined by plating a portion of electroporated cells on the medium containing 100 µg/ml of Km. Mutant frequency was calculated as the ratio of mutant clone to total clone. Sequence analysis was performed using a GenomeLab GeXP Genetic Analysis System (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA). We analyzed a total of 3.1–20 × 104 clones in each rescue experiment and repeated experiments at least five times. Plural mutations in one clone, i.e. multiple base changes, a base change combined with a frameshift, or a deletion accompanied with an insertion, were scored as a ‘complex mutation’. All mutations from independent clones were counted as independent mutations.

RESULTS

Sensitivity of Arabidopsis seedlings to γ-rays and 320-MeV 12C6+

To compare the effects of γ-rays and 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams on plant tissues, the growth inhibition on young plant tissue was quantified. Seven-day-old seedlings, on which 1–2 true leaves have emerged, were irradiated with γ-rays and 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams. The plants were grown for another 7 days, by which time the plants had developed 4–6 true leaves. We cut the fifth leaf from each plant and measured the area of the leaf using graphics software. Results showed that 320-MeV 12C6+ more severely inhibited the growth of plant leaves than the same dose of γ-rays (Fig. 1). This is due to the deleterious effect of 320-MeV 12C6+ on cell proliferation. To standardize the effect of both radiations, we adopted the Multi-Target Single-Hit model (Fig. 1) that has been shown to work well in plants [7, 9, 16]. Based on these sensitivity curves, 40–100 Gy of γ-rays and 5–35 Gy of 320-MeV 12C6+ reduced the leaf size dose-dependently. We expected that these ranges of radiations might induce mutations effectively in the plant. Based on this prediction, we chose the dose of 64 Gy and 20 Gy for γ-rays and 320-MeV 12C6+, respectively, which reduced the leaf size to ∼50%, and then conducted mutation spectrum analysis.
Fig. 1.

Radiation sensitivity of rpsL-transgenic Arabidopsis. The effect of γ-rays (open circles) and 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams (filled circles) on the growth of Arabidopsis leaves. Radiation sensitivity is shown as the relative leaf size of irradiated plants to that of the unirradiated control plants. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean.

Radiation sensitivity of rpsL-transgenic Arabidopsis. The effect of γ-rays (open circles) and 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams (filled circles) on the growth of Arabidopsis leaves. Radiation sensitivity is shown as the relative leaf size of irradiated plants to that of the unirradiated control plants. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean.

Mutagenicity of γ-rays and 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams

To investigate the mutational effect of γ-rays and 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams on Arabidopsis seedlings, the mutation frequencies were determined using the plasmid-rescue method (Table 1). The mutant frequency of unirradiated seedlings was 3.4 × 10−5, as found in our previous report [16]. By irradiating with 64 Gy of γ-rays, the mutant frequency increased significantly (4.1-fold, P < 0.01). In contrast, 20 Gy of carbon ions increased the mutant frequency by 2.9-fold, but this increase was not statistically significant. Therefore, these results suggest that a 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beam is less effective than γ-rays in inducing detectable mutations in this assay system.
Table 1.

Mutant frequencies induced by γ-rays and 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams

Mutant cloneaTotal clonea (×105)Mutant frequencyb (×10−5)
Background339.23.4 ± 0.8
γ-rays443.614 ± 7*
320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams273.310 ± 12

aSum of 5–10 independent experiments. bAverage of 5–10 independent experiments with SD. *Statistically significant compared to unirradiated (‘background’) plants (P < 0.01).

Mutant frequencies induced by γ-rays and 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams aSum of 5–10 independent experiments. bAverage of 5–10 independent experiments with SD. *Statistically significant compared to unirradiated (‘background’) plants (P < 0.01).

Mutation induced by γ-rays and a 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beam in Arabidopsis seedlings

We analyzed mutation spectra induced by γ-rays and a 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beam, as well as unirradiated (‘background’) seedlings. All mutations were classified into three groups: base substitutions, frameshifts, and ‘other’ (Fig. 2). In comparison with unirradiated plants, both radiations increased the frequency of frameshifts and ‘other’ mutations, but only γ-rays resulted in a significant increase in the frequency of total base substitutions.
Fig. 2.

Frequency of mutations classified into three categories. The frequency of mutations was calculated from the ratio of mutant clone numbers to predicted total analyzed clone numbers. Frameshifts include one base insertion, one base deletion, and deletion of two contiguous bases. Others are a deletion or insertion of ≥3 bases, plural base substitutions, base substitution accompanied by a frameshift, and deletion accompanied by an insertion. *Statistically significant compared with unirradiated (‘background’) plants according to the Poisson test (P < 0.01).

Frequency of mutations classified into three categories. The frequency of mutations was calculated from the ratio of mutant clone numbers to predicted total analyzed clone numbers. Frameshifts include one base insertion, one base deletion, and deletion of two contiguous bases. Others are a deletion or insertion of ≥3 bases, plural base substitutions, base substitution accompanied by a frameshift, and deletion accompanied by an insertion. *Statistically significant compared with unirradiated (‘background’) plants according to the Poisson test (P < 0.01). We analyzed the type of each mutation (Table 2). Regarding the types of base substitutions, γ-rays resulted in a significant increase in the frequency of G:C to A:T transitions (P < 0.01). Furthermore, γ-rays increased the frequencies of –1 and –2 frameshifts, deletions/insertions, and complex mutations (P < 0.01). In contrast, 320-MeV 12C6+ increased G:C to T:A and A:T to C:G transversions, –1 frameshifts and complex mutations (P < 0.01). There was no increase in both transversions associated with γ-rays, which was consistent with our previous mutation analysis in Arabidopsis dry seeds [16].
Table 2.

Mutation spectra of Arabidopsis seedlings following ionizing radiation

Background
γ-rays
320-MeV 12C6+
NMMF (×10−5)NMMF (×10−5)NMMF (×10−5)
Transition
 G → A9(1.0)11(3.1)*2(0.6)
 A → G1(0.1)0(<0.3)0(<0.3)
Transversion
 G → T1(0.1)2(0.6)3(0.9)*
 G → C3(0.3)2(0.6)2(0.6)
 A → T3(0.3)4(1.1)**0(<0.3)
 A → C0(<0.1)1(0.3)2(0.6)*
Frameshifts
 +10(<0.1)1(0.3)1(0.3)
 –18(0.9)9(2.5)*8(2.4)*
 –20(<0.1)2(0.6)*0(<0.3)
Deletion8(0.9)9(2.5)*6(1.8)**
Complex0(< 0.1)3(0.8)*3(0.9)*
Total33(3.6)44(12.4)27(8.2)

Mutant frequency is derived from the ratio of mutant clone numbers to predicted total analyzed clone numbers. NM = number of mutants, MF = mutant frequency. The statistical significance of differences between the irradiated group and the unirradiated (‘background’) group was examined using the Poisson test (*P < 0.01, **P < 0.05).

Mutation spectra of Arabidopsis seedlings following ionizing radiation Mutant frequency is derived from the ratio of mutant clone numbers to predicted total analyzed clone numbers. NM = number of mutants, MF = mutant frequency. The statistical significance of differences between the irradiated group and the unirradiated (‘background’) group was examined using the Poisson test (*P < 0.01, **P < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

In this study, we irradiated Arabidopsis seedlings with 64 Gy of γ-rays and 20 Gy of 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams, which reduced leaf size to ∼50%, then analyzed the mutation spectrum. In the previous study, we irradiated Arabidopsis dry seeds with 740 Gy of γ-rays and 140 Gy of 208-MeV 12C5+, each of which correspond to 0.8 Dq of survivals and provide similar mutation frequencies (Yoshihara et al, 2010). Here, we used the reduction of leaf size as an index and expected the doses causing a similar degree of reduction to also cause a similar induction of mutation frequency. However, results revealed that the mutant frequency increased following irradiation by γ-rays (64 Gy), but did not increase significantly following irradiation by 320-MeV 12C6+ (20 Gy), although both conditions reduced leaf size to ∼50%. Since the growth of leaves depends on multiple factors, such as cell death, cell-cycle arrest, or cell-expansion, it did not simply correlate with the DNA damage and/or mutations. Namely, the reason that the 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beam did not elevate mutant frequency could be because the dose was too low to induce mutations. It would be necessary to analyze the dose response of mutations in order to elucidate all the characteristics of these radiations. Nevertheless, though limited, the data obtained in this work shed light on the understanding of mutations by γ-rays and a 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beam, as discussed below. The mutation spectrum analysis showed an increase in the total number of base substitutions after γ-ray irradiation, but not after radiation from the 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beam (Fig. 2). Oxidative damage to DNA, which is mainly caused by radicals from water radiolysis as an indirect effect of ionizing radiation, is often involved in the induction of base substitutions [21]. Therefore, it is possible that more radicals were induced in plant cells by γ-rays than by the 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beam in these assay conditions. This difference might have caused the difference in mutant frequencies. In contrast, both types of radiations increased the frequency of deletions/insertions and complex mutations compared with that observed in unirradiated plants (Fig. 2). It is known that these mutations occur during the process of DSB repair by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) [22]. It is reasonable to claim that both radiations induced DSBs in Arabidopsis plants. In our previous work, Arabidopsis plants with a disrupted DNA Ligase IV gene, a key component of the NHEJ pathway, showed a markedly higher sensitivity than the wild-type to ion beams [13]. These data also support the idea that DSBs formed by the radiation exposure were mostly repaired by the NHEJ pathway in Arabidopsis seedlings. The simplest interpretation is that the γ-rays and 320-MeV 12C6+ carbon beam induced a comparable number of DSBs, which led to deletions/insertions or complex mutations with similar frequencies (3.4 and 2.7 × 10−5, respectively) (Fig. 2). In this study, plural base substitutions, base substitution accompanied by a frameshift, and a deletion combined with an insertion, were categorized as ‘complex mutations’. These mutations are known to be induced by repair or replication of damaged DNA. For example, in the NHEJ repair process, 1–2 bp of microhomology near the DNA end is often utilized to rejoin the DSB. After annealing of the homologous base(s), the flanking mismatched base(s) is sometimes deleted or inserted by fill-in activity [23, 24]. Some DNA polymerase can fill the strand gap even when the template has a gap, a damaged base, or a mismatched base [25-27]. Such error-prone repair may lead to a deletion combined with an insertion, or a base substitution accompanied by a frameshift, which is likely to occur when the DSB end is not complementary. It is known that a template involving a damaged base causes primer–template misalignment, which may induce plural base substitutions or a base substitution accompanied by a frameshift [28, 29]. Such error-prone replications are likely to occur when DNA damage is not completely removed before replication. The mutation spectra showed that both γ-rays and 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams significantly induced complex mutations (Fig. 2). We therefore speculate that some DSBs, or other base damage induced by both radiations, are difficult to repair, and that the plant cells are subject to error-prone repair or replication. Both γ-rays and 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams increased the frequency of –1 frameshift mutations (Table 2). It is thought that +1 and –1 frameshifts are mainly caused by primer–template misalignment at or near the damaged base during DNA replication [30-32]. In addition, it has been shown that some +1 and –1 frameshifts may be induced in the process of DSB repair by NHEJ [33, 34]. In yeast, it was estimated that ∼50% of +1 and –1 frameshifts are induced by the NHEJ pathway [34]. Considering the few base substitutions induced by the 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams (Fig. 2), it is possible that the formation of base lesions was not elevated by 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams compared with that of unirradiated plants. In contrast, the frameshifts were significantly higher in 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beam-irradiated plants than in unirradiated plants (Fig. 2). Therefore, it is likely that the increase in –1 frameshifts in irradiated seedlings was due to failed DSB repair by the NHEJ pathway, at least in part. The G:C to T:A and A:T to C:G transversions are mainly induced by guanine oxidation and subsequent 8-oxoguanine and adenine mispairing during DNA replication [15]. Since Arabidopsis seedlings have a high water content and cell proliferation activity, we predicted that the mutations in seedlings might reflect the increased 8-oxoguanine and other oxidative damage caused by the irradiation. Contrary to our prediction, however, γ-rays did not increase the G:C to T:A and A:T to C:G transversions in Arabidopsis seedlings (Table 2). In contrast, 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams increased both transversions by 8.4 and >5.6 times, which is statistically significant compared with control seedlings. However, the total numbers of G:C to T:A and A:T to C:G transversions were only 3 and 2, respectively, which were fewer than those of other mutations such as –1 frameshifts and deletions/insertions in 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beam-irradiated plants. It is premature to conclude that 320-MeV 12C6+ ion beams induced more 8-oxoguanine than γ-rays in plant cells. Instead, as mentioned below, it is possible that various forms of oxidative damage other than 8-oxoguanine are major sources of mutations in γ-ray-irradiated plants. It is reasonable to expect that 8-oxoguanine has a limited effect on mutagenesis in Arabidopsis cells. The important repair enzymes for 8-oxoguanine in E. coli and humans are mutT/MTH1, mutY/MYH and mutM/OGG1 [35, 36]. The Arabidopsis genome also has the homologs of these genes [37]. However, mutant plants deficient in the mutT/MTH1- or mutM/OGG1-homolog showed indistinguishable sensitivity to oxidative stress compared with wild-type plants [38, 39]. Our preliminary experiment showed that the γ-ray sensitivity of Arabidopsis mth1 and myh1 mutant plants was the same as that of wild-type plants (data not shown). On the basis of these findings, it is possible that (i) ionizing radiation causes only a modest increase in the amount of 8-oxoguanine in Arabidopsis cells, or (ii) Arabidopsis has another system(s) to suppress the mutagenic effect of 8-oxoguanine. The frequency of G:C to A:T transitions increased significantly following γ-ray exposure (Table 2). The G:C to A:T transition is known to be induced by various types of base lesions. Cytosine glycol, a form of oxidized cytosine, is a possible candidate lesion that induced G:G to A:T transitions in Arabidopsis seedlings. Cytosine glycol often changes to 5-hydroxy-uracil by dehydration and deamination, which is mispaired with adenine and induces the G:C to A:T transition [14]. Uracil DNA glycosylase (Ung) and single-strand selective monofunctional uracil DNA glycosylase (Smug1) excise oxidized cytosine derivatives from DNA [14]. An et al. (2005) showed that these enzymes have redundant roles in resisting the effects of γ-rays and preventing G:C to A:T transitions in mammalian cells [40]. In addition, mammalian cells have thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG), endonuclease III (Nth) and endonuclease VIII (Nei), and E. coli cells have Ung, Nth, Nei and mismatch-specific uracil DNA-glycosylase (MUG) as glycosylases for oxidative cytosine derivatives [14]. Only Ung and Nth are found in Arabidopsis [41, 42]. Therefore, it is possible that Arabidopsis has a weak repair ability for oxidative cytosine derivatives and cannot prevent G:C to A:T transitions after exposure to γ-rays.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our mutation spectrum analysis suggested that plants might have a unique mechanism for maintaining genomic stability against radiation-induced oxidative damage. Further studies, including dose–response analysis of mutagenesis for both radiations, are needed to elucidate the details of the DNA repair pathways and radiation mutagenesis in higher plants.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the Atomic Energy Basic Infrastructure Research Initiative (210105) from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), as well as Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (24241028) and Scientific Research (C) (22570055) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).
  40 in total

1.  Implication of DNA polymerase lambda in alignment-based gap filling for nonhomologous DNA end joining in human nuclear extracts.

Authors:  Jae Wan Lee; Luis Blanco; Tong Zhou; Miguel Garcia-Diaz; Katarzyna Bebenek; Thomas A Kunkel; Zhigang Wang; Lawrence F Povirk
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  LET dependence of lethality of carbon ion irradiation to single tobacco cells.

Authors:  Y Yokota; Y Hase; N Shikazono; A Tanaka; M Inoue
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Analysis of mutations induced by carbon ions in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Naoya Shikazono; Chihiro Suzuki; Satoshi Kitamura; Hiroshi Watanabe; Shigemitsu Tano; Atsushi Tanaka
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2005-01-10       Impact factor: 6.992

4.  DNA adduct bypass polymerization by Sulfolobus solfataricus DNA polymerase Dpo4: analysis and crystal structures of multiple base pair substitution and frameshift products with the adduct 1,N2-ethenoguanine.

Authors:  Hong Zang; Angela K Goodenough; Jeong-Yun Choi; Adriana Irimia; Lioudmila V Loukachevitch; Ivan D Kozekov; Karen C Angel; Carmelo J Rizzo; Martin Egli; F Peter Guengerich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  C --> T mutagenesis and gamma-radiation sensitivity due to deficiency in the Smug1 and Ung DNA glycosylases.

Authors:  Qian An; Peter Robins; Tomas Lindahl; Deborah E Barnes
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 6.  Mutagenesis and carcinogenesis caused by the oxidation of nucleic acids.

Authors:  Yusaku Nakabeppu; Kunihiko Sakumi; Katsumi Sakamoto; Daisuke Tsuchimoto; Teruhisa Tsuzuki; Yoshimichi Nakatsu
Journal:  Biol Chem       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.915

7.  Arabidopsis uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG) is required for base excision repair of uracil and increases plant sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil.

Authors:  Dolores Córdoba-Cañero; Emeline Dubois; Rafael R Ariza; Marie-Pascale Doutriaux; Teresa Roldán-Arjona
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  AtNUDX1, an 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine 5'-triphosphate pyrophosphohydrolase, is responsible for eliminating oxidized nucleotides in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Kazuya Yoshimura; Takahisa Ogawa; Yayoi Ueda; Shigeru Shigeoka
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 9.  Repair and tolerance of oxidative DNA damage in plants.

Authors:  Teresa Roldán-Arjona; Rafael R Ariza
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Tolerance for 8-oxoguanine but not thymine glycol in alignment-based gap filling of partially complementary double-strand break ends by DNA polymerase lambda in human nuclear extracts.

Authors:  Rui-Zhe Zhou; Luis Blanco; Miguel Garcia-Diaz; Katarzyna Bebenek; Thomas A Kunkel; Lawrence F Povirk
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  9 in total

1.  Frequency and type of inheritable mutations induced by γ rays in rice as revealed by whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Shan Li; Yun-Chao Zheng; Hai-Rui Cui; Hao-Wei Fu; Qing-Yao Shu; Jian-Zhong Huang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2016 Dec.       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Deletion of TLS polymerases promotes homologous recombination in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  A N Sakamoto; H Kaya; M Endo
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2018-06-26

3.  Photosynthetic Effect in Selenastrum capricornutum Progeny after Carbon-Ion Irradiation.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Xin Li; Dong Lu; Yan Du; Liang Ma; Wenjian Li; Jihong Chen; Fuli Li; Yong Fan; Guangrong Hu; Jufang Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  An ion beam-induced Arabidopsis mutant with marked chromosomal rearrangement.

Authors:  Ayako N Sakamoto; Vo Thi Thuong Lan; Satoru Fujimoto; Sachihiro Matsunaga; Atsushi Tanaka
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Physiological status of plant tissue affects the frequency and types of mutations induced by carbon-ion irradiation in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Hase; Katsuya Satoh; Satoshi Kitamura; Yutaka Oono
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Chloroplast Protein 12 Expression Alters Growth and Chilling Tolerance in Tropical Forage Stylosanthes guianensis (Aublet) Sw.

Authors:  Kailong Li; Hong Qiu; Min Zhou; Yang Lin; Zhenfei Guo; Shaoyun Lu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Comparison and Characterization of Mutations Induced by Gamma-Ray and Carbon-Ion Irradiation in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Using Whole-Genome Resequencing.

Authors:  Feng Li; Akemi Shimizu; Takeshi Nishio; Nobuhiro Tsutsumi; Hiroshi Kato
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Genome-Wide Comparisons of Mutations Induced by Carbon-Ion Beam and Gamma-Rays Irradiation in Rice via Resequencing Multiple Mutants.

Authors:  Guili Yang; Wenlong Luo; Jian Zhang; Xiancheng Yan; Yan Du; Libin Zhou; Wenjian Li; Hui Wang; Zhiqiang Chen; Tao Guo
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Frequency and Spectrum of Mutations Induced by Gamma Rays Revealed by Phenotype Screening and Whole-Genome Re-Sequencing in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Yan Du; Zhuo Feng; Jie Wang; Wenjie Jin; Zhuanzi Wang; Tao Guo; Yuze Chen; Hui Feng; Lixia Yu; Wenjian Li; Libin Zhou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.