Literature DB >> 23727519

Compliance with cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus testing guidelines among insured young women.

Jacqueline M Hirth1, Alai Tan, Gregg S Wilkinson, Abbey B Berenson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In December 2009, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommended that women under 21 years old should not receive cervical cancer screening (Papanicolaou tests) or human papillomavirus (HPV) tests. This study examined whether clinicians stopped administering Papanicolaou and HPV tests among women younger than 21 years of age after new ACOG guidelines were issued. STUDY
DESIGN: This study was a retrospective secondary data analysis of administrative claims data that included insurance enrollees from across the United States that examined the frequency of Papanicolaou tests and HPV tests among 178,898 nonimmunocompromised females 12-20 years old who had a paid claim for a well-woman visit in 2008, 2009, or 2010. Young women with well-woman examinations in each observed year were examined longitudinally to determine whether past diagnoses of cervical cell abnormalities accounted for Papanicolaou testing in 2010.
RESULTS: The proportion of women younger than 21 years old that received a Papanicolaou test as part of her well-woman exam dropped from 77% in 2008 and 2009 to 57% by December of 2010, whereas HPV testing remained stable across time. A diagnosis of cervical cell abnormalities in 2009 was associated with Papanicolaou testing in 2010. However, a previous Papanicolaou test was more strongly associated with a Papanicolaou test in 2010.
CONCLUSION: These data show that some physicians are adjusting their practices among young women according to ACOG guidelines, but Papanicolaou and HPV testing among insured women younger than 21 years of age still remains unnecessarily high.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Papanicolaou test; guidelines compliance; human papillomavirus; human papillomavirus test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23727519      PMCID: PMC3758398          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  22 in total

1.  ACOG Practice Bulletin: clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 45, August 2003. Cervical cytology screening (replaces committee opinion 152, March 1995).

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Regression of low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions in young women.

Authors:  Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Stephen Shiboski; Nancy K Hills; Kimberly J Powell; Naomi Jay; Evelyn N Hanson; Susanna Miller; K Lisa Canjura-Clayton; Sepidah Farhat; Jeanette M Broering; Teresa M Darragh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Nov 6-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Cervical surgery and preterm birth.

Authors:  Lynn Sadler; Audrey Saftlas
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.901

4.  Rate of and risks for regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in adolescents and young women.

Authors:  Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Yifei Ma; Charles Wibbelsman; Teresa M Darragh; Adaleen Powers; Sepideh Farhat; Stephen Shiboski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Human papillomavirus and cervical disease in adolescents.

Authors:  Richard Guido
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.190

Review 6.  The risk of preterm birth following treatment for precancerous changes in the cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  F J Bruinsma; M A Quinn
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Cervical dysplasia in adolescents.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Rosa M Davila; Karen R Pinto; Diane F Merritt; Randall K Gibb; Janet S Rader; David G Mutch; Feng Gao; Matthew A Powell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Burden of cervical cancer in the United States, 1998-2003.

Authors:  Meg Watson; Mona Saraiya; Vicki Benard; Steven S Coughlin; Lisa Flowers; Vilma Cokkinides; Molly Schwenn; Youjie Huang; Anna Giuliano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Psychosocial outcomes of three triage methods for the management of borderline abnormal cervical smears: an open randomised trial.

Authors:  Kirsten J McCaffery; Les Irwig; Robin Turner; Siew Foong Chan; Petra Macaskill; Mary Lewicka; Judith Clarke; Edith Weisberg; Alex Barratt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-02-23

10.  Risks for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 among adolescents and young women with abnormal cytology.

Authors:  Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Yifei Ma; Charles Wibbelsman; Adaleen Powers; Teresa M Darragh; Sepideh Farhat; Ruth Shaber; Stephen Shiboski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  8 in total

1.  Excess Cost of Cervical Cancer Screening Beyond Recommended Screening Ages or After Hysterectomy in a Single Institution.

Authors:  Deanna Teoh; Gretchen Hultman; McKenzie DeKam; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Levi S Downs; Melissa A Geller; Chap Le; Genevieve Melton; Shalini Kulasingam
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Effect of number of human papillomavirus vaccine doses on guideline adherent cervical cytology screening among 19-26year old females.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Hirth; Yu-Li Lin; Yong-Fang Kuo; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Single Health System Adherence to 2012 Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines at Extremes of Age and Posthysterectomy.

Authors:  Deanna Teoh; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Gretchen Hultman; Minnu Monu; Levi Downs; Melissa A Geller; Chap Le; Genevieve Melton-Meaux; Shalini Kulasingam
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Utilization of Women's Preventive Health Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Nora V Becker; Michelle H Moniz; Renuka Tipirneni; Vanessa K Dalton; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2021-07-02

5.  Women's Understanding of the Term 'Pap smear': A Comparison of Spanish-Speaking Versus English-Speaking Women.

Authors:  David L Howard; Beth Soulli; Nicole Johnson; Saladin Cooper
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-11

6.  Effect of an Electronic Health Record Decision Support Alert to Decrease Excess Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Deanna Teoh; Rachel I Vogel; Adam Langer; Jinai Bharucha; Melissa A Geller; Eileen Harwood; Shalini Kulasingam; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.842

7.  Knowledge of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in the USA, the UK and Australia: an international survey.

Authors:  Rachael H Dodd; Kirsten J McCaffery; Laura A V Marlow; Remo Ostini; Gregory D Zimet; Jo Waller
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  Unindicated cervical cancer screening in adolescent females within a large healthcare system in the United States.

Authors:  Hillary Hosier; Sangini S Sheth; Carlos R Oliveira; Lauren E Perley; Alla Vash-Margita
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 8.661

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.