Literature DB >> 23726001

A fully automated method for CT-on-rails-guided online adaptive planning for prostate cancer intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Xiaoqiang Li1, Enzhuo M Quan, Yupeng Li, Xiaoning Pan, Yin Zhou, Xiaochun Wang, Weiliang Du, Rajat J Kudchadker, Jennifer L Johnson, Deborah A Kuban, Andrew K Lee, Xiaodong Zhang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to validate a fully automated adaptive planning (AAP) method which integrates automated recontouring and automated replanning to account for interfractional anatomical changes in prostate cancer patients receiving adaptive intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) based on daily repeated computed tomography (CT)-on-rails images. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine prostate cancer patients treated at our institution were randomly selected. For the AAP method, contours on each repeat CT image were automatically generated by mapping the contours from the simulation CT image using deformable image registration. An in-house automated planning tool incorporated into the Pinnacle treatment planning system was used to generate the original and the adapted IMRT plans. The cumulative dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the target and critical structures were calculated based on the manual contours for all plans and compared with those of plans generated by the conventional method, that is, shifting the isocenters by aligning the images based on the center of the volume (COV) of prostate (prostate COV-aligned).
RESULTS: The target coverage from our AAP method for every patient was acceptable, while 1 of the 9 patients showed target underdosing from prostate COV-aligned plans. The normalized volume receiving at least 70 Gy (V70), and the mean dose of the rectum and bladder were reduced by 8.9%, 6.4 Gy and 4.3%, 5.3 Gy, respectively, for the AAP method compared with the values obtained from prostate COV-aligned plans.
CONCLUSIONS: The AAP method, which is fully automated, is effective for online replanning to compensate for target dose deficits and critical organ overdosing caused by interfractional anatomical changes in prostate cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23726001     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

1.  Proton dose calculation on scatter-corrected CBCT image: Feasibility study for adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Yang-Kyun Park; Gregory C Sharp; Justin Phillips; Brian A Winey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations.

Authors:  Mohammad Hussein; Ben J M Heijmen; Dirk Verellen; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Dosimetric Uncertainties Resulting From Interfractional Anatomic Variations for Patients Receiving Pancreas Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Image Guidance.

Authors:  Joshua S Niedzielski; Yufei Liu; Sylvia S W Ng; Rachael M Martin; Luis A Perles; Sam Beddar; Neal Rebueno; Eugene J Koay; Cullen Taniguchi; Emma B Holliday; Prajnan Das; Grace L Smith; Bruce D Minsky; Ethan B Ludmir; Joseph M Herman; Albert Koong; Gabriel O Sawakuchi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Cone-beam computed tomography-guided online adaptive radiotherapy is feasible for prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Lisanne G M Zwart; Francisca Ong; Liselotte A Ten Asbroek; Erik B van Dieren; Siete A Koch; Anand Bhawanie; Elisabeth de Wit; Judith J Dasselaar
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-05-14

Review 5.  Biological Rationale and Clinical Evidence of Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy for Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Pierre Loap; Barbara Vischioni; Maria Bonora; Rossana Ingargiola; Sara Ronchi; Viviana Vitolo; Amelia Barcellini; Lucia Goanta; Ludovic De Marzi; Remi Dendale; Roberto Pacelli; Laura Locati; Valentin Calugaru; Hamid Mammar; Stefano Cavalieri; Youlia Kirova; Ester Orlandi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Varian ethos online adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Early results of contouring accuracy, treatment plan quality, and treatment time.

Authors:  Mikel Byrne; Ben Archibald-Heeren; Yunfei Hu; Amy Teh; Rhea Beserminji; Emma Cai; Guilin Liu; Angela Yates; James Rijken; Nick Collett; Trent Aland
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 7.  Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART) Strategies and Technical Considerations: A State of the ART Review From NRG Oncology.

Authors:  Carri K Glide-Hurst; Percy Lee; Adam D Yock; Jeffrey R Olsen; Minsong Cao; Farzan Siddiqui; William Parker; Anthony Doemer; Yi Rong; Amar U Kishan; Stanley H Benedict; X Allen Li; Beth A Erickson; Jason W Sohn; Ying Xiao; Evan Wuthrick
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 7.038

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.