Literature DB >> 23725748

Next generation sequencing in psychiatric research: what study participants need to know about research findings.

Ghislaine Mathieu1, Iris Jaitovich Groisman, Beatrice Godard.   

Abstract

The use of next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies in psychiatric genetics research and its potential to generate individual research results will likely have far reaching implications for predictive and diagnostic practices. The extent of this impact may not be easily understood by psychiatric research participants during the consent process. The traditional consent process for studies involving human subjects does not address critical issues specific to NGS research, such as the return of results. We examined which type of research findings should be communicated, how this information should be conveyed during the consent process and what guidance is required by researchers and IRBs to help psychiatric research participants understand the peculiarities, the limits and the impact of NGS. Strong standards are needed to ensure appropriate use of data generated by NGS, to meet participants' expectations and needs, and to clarify researchers' duties regarding the disclosure of data and their subsequent management. In the short term, researchers and IRBs need to be proactive in revising current consent processes that deal with the disclosure of research findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23725748     DOI: 10.1017/S1461145713000527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol        ISSN: 1461-1457            Impact factor:   5.176


  8 in total

1.  Genetic counseling practice in next generation sequencing research: implications for the ethical oversight of the informed consent process.

Authors:  Nathalie Egalite; Iris Jaitovich Groisman; Beatrice Godard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Adolescent perspectives on the return of individual results in genomic addiction research.

Authors:  Marilyn E Coors; Kristen M Raymond; Shannon K McWilliams; Christian J Hopfer; Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson
Journal:  Psychiatr Genet       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.458

3.  Practices and views of neurologists regarding the use of whole-genome sequencing in clinical settings: a web-based survey.

Authors:  Iris Jaitovich Groisman; Thierry Hurlimann; Amir Shoham; Béatrice Godard
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Clinical and ethical considerations of massively parallel sequencing in transplantation science.

Authors:  Andreas Scherer
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2013-12-24

5.  Privacy and ethical challenges in next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Nicole Martinez-Martin; David Magnus
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2019-04-08

6.  Consenting for current genetic research: is Canadian practice adequate?

Authors:  Iris Jaitovich Groisman; Nathalie Egalite; Beatrice Godard
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Impact of Next Generation Sequencing on the Organization and Funding of Returning Research Results: Survey of Canadian Research Ethics Boards Members.

Authors:  Iris Jaitovich Groisman; Beatrice Godard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Psychiatric genomics researchers' perspectives on best practices for returning results to individual participants.

Authors:  Kristin Kostick; Stacey Pereira; Cody Brannan; Laura Torgerson; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 8.822

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.