Literature DB >> 23725643

Shift work, circadian gene variants and risk of breast cancer.

Anne Grundy1, Johanna M Schuetz, Agnes S Lai, Rozmin Janoo-Gilani, Stephen Leach, Igor Burstyn, Harriet Richardson, Angela Brooks-Wilson, John J Spinelli, Kristan J Aronson.   

Abstract

Circadian (clock) genes have been linked with several functions relevant to cancer, and epidemiologic research has suggested relationships with breast cancer risk for variants in NPAS2, CLOCK, CRY2 and TIMELESS. Increased breast cancer risk has also been observed among shift workers, suggesting potential interactions in relationships of circadian genes with breast cancer. Relationships with breast cancer of 100 SNPs in 14 clock-related genes, as well as potential interactions with shift work history, were investigated in a case-control study (1042 cases, 1051 controls). Odds ratios in an additive genetic model for European-ancestry participants (645 cases, 806 controls) were calculated, using a two-step correction for multiple testing: within each gene through permutation testing (10,000 permutations), and correcting for the false discovery rate across genes. Interactions of genotypes with ethnicity and shift work (<2 years vs ≥2 years) were evaluated individually. Following permutation analysis, two SNPs (rs3816360 in ARNTL and rs11113179 in CRY1) displayed significant associations with breast cancer and one SNP (rs3027188 in PER1) was marginally significant; however, none were significant following adjustment for the false discovery rate. No significant interaction with shift work history was detected. If shift work causes circadian disruption, this was not reflected in associations between clock gene variants and breast cancer risk in this study. Larger studies are needed to assess interactions with longer durations (>30 years) of shift work that have been associated with breast cancer.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Case–control; Clock genes; Interactions; Shift work

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23725643     DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2013.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol        ISSN: 1877-7821            Impact factor:   2.984


  28 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer and circadian disruption from electric lighting in the modern world.

Authors:  Richard G Stevens; George C Brainard; David E Blask; Steven W Lockley; Mario E Motta
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  State of the evidence 2017: an update on the connection between breast cancer and the environment.

Authors:  Janet M Gray; Sharima Rasanayagam; Connie Engel; Jeanne Rizzo
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 5.984

3.  Shift work and breast cancer among women textile workers in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Wenjin Li; Roberta M Ray; David B Thomas; Scott Davis; Michael Yost; Norman Breslow; Dao Li Gao; E Dawn Fitzgibbons; Janice E Camp; Eva Wong; Karen J Wernli; Harvey Checkoway
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Genetic variation in vitamin D-related genes and risk of breast cancer among women of European and East Asian descent.

Authors:  Joy Shi; Anne Grundy; Harriet Richardson; Igor Burstyn; Johanna M Schuetz; Caroline A Lohrisch; Sandip K SenGupta; Agnes S Lai; Angela Brooks-Wilson; John J Spinelli; Kristan J Aronson
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-12-02

5.  Women's occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Derrick G Lee; Igor Burstyn; Agnes S Lai; Anne Grundy; Melissa C Friesen; Kristan J Aronson; John J Spinelli
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.948

6.  Inherited variation in circadian rhythm genes and risks of prostate cancer and three other cancer sites in combined cancer consortia.

Authors:  Fangyi Gu; Han Zhang; Paula L Hyland; Sonja Berndt; Susan M Gapstur; William Wheeler; The Ellipse Consortium; Christopher I Amos; Stephane Bezieau; Heike Bickeböller; Hermann Brenner; Paul Brennan; Jenny Chang-Claude; David V Conti; Jennifer Anne Doherty; Stephen B Gruber; Tabitha A Harrison; Richard B Hayes; Michael Hoffmeister; Richard S Houlston; Rayjean J Hung; Mark A Jenkins; Peter Kraft; Kate Lawrenson; James McKay; Sarah Markt; Lorelei Mucci; Catherine M Phelan; Conghui Qu; Angela Risch; Mary Anne Rossing; H-Erich Wichmann; Jianxin Shi; Eva Schernhammer; Kai Yu; Maria Teresa Landi; Neil E Caporaso
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 7.316

7.  Genetic association between PER3 genetic polymorphisms and cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peiliang Geng; Juanjuan Ou; Jianjun Li; Ning Wang; Ganfeng Xie; Rina Sa; Chen Liu; Lisha Xiang; Houjie Liang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Carcinogenic effects of circadian disruption: an epigenetic viewpoint.

Authors:  Abbas Salavaty
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2015-08-08

9.  Loss of circadian clock gene expression is associated with tumor progression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Cristina Cadenas; Leonie van de Sandt; Karolina Edlund; Miriam Lohr; Birte Hellwig; Rosemarie Marchan; Marcus Schmidt; Jörg Rahnenführer; Henrik Oster; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  The Nightingale study: rationale, study design and baseline characteristics of a prospective cohort study on shift work and breast cancer risk among nurses.

Authors:  Anouk Pijpe; Pauline Slottje; Cres van Pelt; Floor Stehmann; Hans Kromhout; Flora E van Leeuwen; Roel C H Vermeulen; Matti A Rookus
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.