Literature DB >> 23724986

Accuracy of deep brain stimulation electrode placement using intraoperative computed tomography without microelectrode recording.

Kim J Burchiel1, Shirley McCartney, Albert Lee, Ahmed M Raslan.   

Abstract

OBJECT: In this prospective study the authors' objective was to evaluate the accuracy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode placement using image guidance for direct anatomical targeting with intraoperative CT.
METHODS: Preoperative 3-T MR images were merged with intraoperative CT images for planning. Electrode targets were anatomical, based on the MR images. A skull-mounted NexFrame system was used for electrode placement, and all procedures were performed under general anesthesia. After electrode placement, intraoperative CT images were merged with trajectory planning images to calculate accuracy. Accuracy was assessed by both vector error and deviation off the planned trajectory.
RESULTS: Sixty patients (33 with Parkinson disease, 26 with essential tremor, and 1 with dystonia) underwent the procedure. Patient's mean age was 64 ± 9.5 years. Over an 18-month period, 119 electrodes were placed (all bilateral, except one). Electrode implant locations were the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM), globus pallidus internus (GPI), and subthalamic nucleus (STN) in 25, 23, and 12 patients, respectively. Target accuracy measurements were as follows: mean vector error 1.59 ± 1.11 mm and mean deviation off trajectory 1.24 ± 0.87 mm. There was no statistically significant difference between the accuracy of left and right brain electrodes. There was a statistically significant (negative) correlation between the distance of the closest approach of the electrode trajectory to the ventricular wall of the lateral ventricle and vector error (r(2) = -0.339, p < 0.05, n = 76), and the deviation from the planned trajectory (r(2) = -0.325, p < 0.05, n = 77). Furthermore, when the distance from the electrode trajectory and the ventricular wall was < 4 mm, the correlation of the ventricular distance to the deviation from the planned trajectory was stronger (r(2) = -0.419, p = 0.05, n = 19). Electrodes placed in the GPI were significantly more accurate than those placed in the VIM (p < 0.05). Only 1 of 119 electrodes required intraoperative replacement due to a vector error > 3 mm. In this series there was one infection and no intraparenchymal hemorrhages.
CONCLUSIONS: Placement of DBS electrodes using an intraoperative CT scanner and the NexFrame achieves an accuracy that is at least comparable to other methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23724986     DOI: 10.3171/2013.4.JNS122324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  39 in total

Review 1.  Deep Brain Stimulation Emergencies: How the New Technologies Could Modify the Current Scenario.

Authors:  Giovanni Cossu; Mariachiara Sensi
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 2.  Surgical Treatment of Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Leo Verhagen Metman; Gian Pal; Konstantin Slavin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Does the Use of Intraoperative Microelectrode Recording Influence the Final Location of Lead Implants in the Ventral Intermediate Nucleus for Deep Brain Stimulation?

Authors:  Sujan Reddy; Albert Fenoy; Erin Furr-Stimming; Mya Schiess; Raja Mehanna
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Auditory Brainstem Implant Array Position Varies Widely Among Adult and Pediatric Patients and Is Associated With Perception.

Authors:  Samuel R Barber; Elliott D Kozin; Aaron K Remenschneider; Sidharth V Puram; Max Smith; Barbara S Herrmann; Mary E Cunnane; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Model-Based Image Updating for Brain Shift in Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Placement Surgery.

Authors:  Chen Li; Xiaoyao Fan; Jennifer Hong; David W Roberts; Joshua P Aronson; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the fornix for Alzheimer's disease: surgical safety in the ADvance trial.

Authors:  Francisco A Ponce; Wael F Asaad; Kelly D Foote; William S Anderson; G Rees Cosgrove; Gordon H Baltuch; Kara Beasley; Donald E Reymers; Esther S Oh; Steven D Targum; Gwenn S Smith; Constantine G Lyketsos; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Anodic stimulation misunderstood: preferential activation of fiber orientations with anodic waveforms in deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Daria Nesterovich Anderson; Gordon Duffley; Johannes Vorwerk; Alan D Dorval; Christopher R Butson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Intraoperative MRI for deep brain stimulation lead placement in Parkinson's disease: 1 year motor and neuropsychological outcomes.

Authors:  Christos Sidiropoulos; Richard Rammo; Brad Merker; Abhimanyu Mahajan; Peter LeWitt; Patricia Kaminski; Melissa Womble; Adrianna Zec; Danette Taylor; Julia Wall; Jason M Schwalb
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  How to avoid pneumocephalus in deep brain stimulation surgery? Analysis of potential risk factors in a series of 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Philipp Krauss; Christiaan Hendrik Bas Van Niftrik; Giovanni Muscas; Pierre Scheffler; Markus Florian Oertel; Lennart Henning Stieglitz
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Comparison of Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Fluoroscopy With Standard Computed Tomography for Stereotactic Frame Registration.

Authors:  Terrance Peng; Daniel R Kramer; Morgan B Lee; Michael F Barbaro; Li Ding; Charles Y Liu; Spencer Kellis; Brian Lee
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.