Literature DB >> 18051662

Flightlessness and the energetic cost of wing molt in a large sea duck.

Magella Guillemette1, David Pelletier, Jean-Marc Grandbois, Patrick J Butler.   

Abstract

Although the replacement of feathers apparently represents the major event of somatic production in the annual cycle of wild birds, knowledge about the energetics of molt has always been hampered by logistical and technical difficulties, which are exacerbated by the fact that birds are able to compensate behaviorally to buffer any variation in energy demand. During wing molt, sea ducks (Mergini) and other diving birds lose all of their wing feathers at once, leading to a period of temporary flightlessness of variable duration, a condition that considerably restricts their movements and increases the probability of predation. In the present study, we present the first results aimed at quantifying the duration of flightlessness, energy expenditure, and foraging effort during molt of a wing-propelled diving bird, the Common Eider (Somateria mollissima). Data loggers were implanted in the body cavity of 13 females to record heart rate and hydrostatic pressure (depth) every two seconds for a period of 220 days. Flight frequency and duration were assessed from elevated and constant heart rate, and the absence of flight was used to quantify the duration of flightlessness, which lasted, on average, 36 +/- 8 days (mean +/- SD). Using a period of four weeks before and four weeks after the flightless period, we found that dive depth (ranging from 1 to 2 m, on average) and daily diving time did not vary during the course of the study. Daily metabolic rate increased by 9%, and resting metabolic rate by 12% from the pre-molt period to the flightless period and remained high during the post-molt period. This study indicates that the energetic costs of replacing flight remiges in female eiders are substantial, although this is not associated with any change in foraging effort, which suggests that female Common Eiders lose mass during wing molt. Finally, estimates of energy savings associated with the total absence of flights during wing molt represent 6% of daily metabolic rate or 14% of resting metabolic rate. This finding contrasts with the classical view that little or no benefit is associated with a flightless condition. We suggest that such energy savings may have favored the evolution of temporary flightlessness in diving birds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18051662     DOI: 10.1890/06-1751.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  11 in total

Review 1.  Convergence of biannual moulting strategies across birds and mammals.

Authors:  Roxanne S Beltran; Jennifer M Burns; Greg A Breed
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Does hyperthermia constrain flight duration in a short-distance migrant?

Authors:  Magella Guillemette; Anthony J Woakes; Jacques Larochelle; Elias T Polymeropoulos; Jean-Marc Granbois; Patrick J Butler; David Pelletier; Peter B Frappell; Steven J Portugal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  To fly or not to fly: high flight costs in a large sea duck do not imply an expensive lifestyle.

Authors:  David Pelletier; Magella Guillemette; Jean-Marc Grandbois; Patrick J Butler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Quantitative Assessment of Current Risks to Harlequin Ducks in Prince William Sound, Alaska, from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill.

Authors:  Mark A Harwell; John H Gentile; Keith R Parker; Stephen M Murphy; Robert H Day; A Edward Bence; Jerry M Neff; John A Wiens
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.190

5.  Quantifying population-level risks using an individual-based model: sea otters, Harlequin Ducks, and the Exxon Valdez oil spill.

Authors:  Mark A Harwell; John H Gentile; Keith R Parker
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.992

6.  Do seaducks minimise the flightless period? Inter- and intra-specific comparisons of remigial moult.

Authors:  Anouck Viain; Jean-Pierre L Savard; Scott Gilliland; Matthew C Perry; Magella Guillemette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Does Water Temperature Affect the Timing and Duration of Remigial Moult in Sea Ducks? An Experimental Approach.

Authors:  Anouck Viain; Magella Guillemette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  It Takes Time to Be Cool: On the Relationship between Hyperthermia and Body Cooling in a Migrating Seaduck.

Authors:  Magella Guillemette; Elias T Polymeropoulos; Steven J Portugal; David Pelletier
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Welfare Consequences of Omitting Beak Trimming in Barn Layers.

Authors:  Anja B Riber; Lena K Hinrichsen
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-12-18

10.  A year in the life of a North Atlantic seabird: behavioural and energetic adjustments during the annual cycle.

Authors:  Ruth E Dunn; Sarah Wanless; Francis Daunt; Michael P Harris; Jonathan A Green
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.