Literature DB >> 23723000

Intrinsically semi-disordered state and its role in induced folding and protein aggregation.

Tuo Zhang1, Eshel Faraggi, Zhixiu Li, Yaoqi Zhou.   

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) refer to those proteins without fixed three-dimensional structures under physiological conditions. Although experiments suggest that the conformations of IDPs can vary from random coils, semi-compact globules, to compact globules with different contents of secondary structures, computational efforts to separate IDPs into different states are not yet successful. Recently, we developed a neural-network-based disorder prediction technique SPINE-D that was ranked as one of the top performing techniques for disorder prediction in the biannual meeting of critical assessment of structure prediction techniques (CASP 9, 2010). Here, we further analyze the results from SPINE-D prediction by defining a semi-disordered state that has about 50% predicted probability to be disordered or ordered. This semi-disordered state is partially collapsed with intermediate levels of predicted solvent accessibility and secondary structure content. The relative difference in compositions between semi-disordered and fully disordered regions is highly correlated with amyloid aggregation propensity (a correlation coefficient of 0.86 if excluding four charged residues and proline, 0.73 if not). In addition, we observed that some semi-disordered regions participate in induced folding, and others play key roles in protein aggregation. More specifically, a semi-disordered region is amyloidogenic in fully unstructured proteins (such as alpha-synuclein and Sup35) but prone to local unfolding that exposes the hydrophobic core to aggregation in structured globular proteins (such as SOD1 and lysozyme). A transition from full disorder to semi-disorder at about 30-40 Qs is observed in the poly-Q (poly-glutamine) tract of huntingtin. The accuracy of using semi-disorder to predict binding-induced folding and aggregation is compared with several methods trained for the purpose. These results indicate the usefulness of three-state classification (order, semi-disorder, and full-disorder) in distinguishing nonfolding from induced-folding and aggregation-resistant from aggregation-prone IDPs and in locating weakly stable, locally unfolding, and potentially aggregation regions in structured proteins. A comparison with five representative disorder-prediction methods showed that SPINE-D is the only method with a clear separation of semi-disorder from ordered and fully disordered states.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23723000      PMCID: PMC3838602          DOI: 10.1007/s12013-013-9638-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys        ISSN: 1085-9195            Impact factor:   2.194


  68 in total

1.  The role of aromaticity, exposed surface, and dipole moment in determining protein aggregation rates.

Authors:  Gian Gaetano Tartaglia; Andrea Cavalli; Riccardo Pellarin; Amedeo Caflisch
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  A comparative study of the relationship between protein structure and beta-aggregation in globular and intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Rune Linding; Joost Schymkowitz; Frederic Rousseau; Francesca Diella; Luis Serrano
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Prediction of protein B-factor profiles.

Authors:  Zheng Yuan; Timothy L Bailey; Rohan D Teasdale
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-03-01

4.  The 3D profile method for identifying fibril-forming segments of proteins.

Authors:  Michael J Thompson; Stuart A Sievers; John Karanicolas; Magdalena I Ivanova; David Baker; David Eisenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Stem-forming regions that are essential for the amyloidogenesis of prion proteins.

Authors:  Masatoshi Saiki; Yuji Hidaka; Masayuki Nara; Hisayuki Morii
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Detecting hidden sequence propensity for amyloid fibril formation.

Authors:  Sukjoon Yoon; William J Welsh
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Aggregation of the Acylphosphatase from Sulfolobus solfataricus: the folded and partially unfolded states can both be precursors for amyloid formation.

Authors:  Georgia Plakoutsi; Niccolò Taddei; Massimo Stefani; Fabrizio Chiti
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Improved sequence-based prediction of disordered regions with multilayer fusion of multiple information sources.

Authors:  Marcin J Mizianty; Wojciech Stach; Ke Chen; Kanaka Durga Kedarisetti; Fatemeh Miri Disfani; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Protein frustratometer: a tool to localize energetic frustration in protein molecules.

Authors:  Michael Jenik; R Gonzalo Parra; Leandro G Radusky; Adrian Turjanski; Peter G Wolynes; Diego U Ferreiro
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  AGGRESCAN: a server for the prediction and evaluation of "hot spots" of aggregation in polypeptides.

Authors:  Oscar Conchillo-Solé; Natalia S de Groot; Francesc X Avilés; Josep Vendrell; Xavier Daura; Salvador Ventura
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  21 in total

1.  Resolving the ambiguity: Making sense of intrinsic disorder when PDB structures disagree.

Authors:  Shelly DeForte; Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Small Molecule Enhancement of 20S Proteasome Activity Targets Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  Corey L Jones; Evert Njomen; Benita Sjögren; Thomas S Dexheimer; Jetze J Tepe
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.100

3.  The role of semidisorder in temperature adaptation of bacterial FlgM proteins.

Authors:  Jihua Wang; Yuedong Yang; Zanxia Cao; Zhixiu Li; Huiying Zhao; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  How disordered is my protein and what is its disorder for? A guide through the "dark side" of the protein universe.

Authors:  Philippe Lieutaud; François Ferron; Alexey V Uversky; Lukasz Kurgan; Vladimir N Uversky; Sonia Longhi
Journal:  Intrinsically Disord Proteins       Date:  2016-12-21

5.  Lysophospholipids induce fibrillation of the repeat domain of Pmel17 through intermediate core-shell structures.

Authors:  Jannik Nedergaard Pedersen; Zhiping Jiang; Gunna Christiansen; Jennifer C Lee; Jan Skov Pedersen; Daniel E Otzen
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.036

6.  Digested disorder, Quarterly intrinsic disorder digest (October-November-December, 2013).

Authors:  Shelly DeForte; Krishna D Reddy; Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Intrinsically Disord Proteins       Date:  2015-03-09

7.  The Effect of (-)-Epigallo-catechin-(3)-gallate on Amyloidogenic Proteins Suggests a Common Mechanism.

Authors:  Kathrin Andrich; Jan Bieschke
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 8.  Intrinsically disordered proteins and proteins with intrinsically disordered regions in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Orkid Coskuner-Weber; Ozan Mirzanli; Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2022-06-08

9.  Analyzing IDPs in Interactomes.

Authors:  Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2020

10.  "Protein aggregates" contain RNA and DNA, entrapped by misfolded proteins but largely rescued by slowing translational elongation.

Authors:  Robert J Shmookler Reis; Ramani Atluri; Meenakshisundaram Balasubramaniam; Jay Johnson; Akshatha Ganne; Srinivas Ayyadevara
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 9.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.