Literature DB >> 23721373

Effects of multiple electron acceptors on microbial interactions in a hydrogen-based biofilm.

He-Ping Zhao1, Zehra Esra Ilhan, Aura Ontiveros-Valencia, Youneng Tang, Bruce E Rittmann, Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown.   

Abstract

To investigate interactions among multiple electron acceptors in a H2-fed biofilm, we operated a membrane biofilm reactor with H2-delivery capacity sufficient to reduce all acceptors. ClO4(-) and O2 were input electron acceptors in all stages at surface loadings of 0.08 ± 0.006 g/m(2)-d (1.0 ± 0.7 e(-) meq/m(2)-d) for ClO4(-) and 0.51 g/m(2)-d (76 e(-) meq/m(2)-d) for O2. SO4(2-) was added in Stage 2 at 3.77 ± 0.39 g/m(2)-d (331 ± 34 e(-) meq/m(2)-d), and NO3(-) was further added in Stage 3 at 0.72 ± 0.03 g N/m(2)-d (312 ± 13 e(-) meq/m(2)-d). At steady state for each stage, ClO4(-), O2, and NO3(-) (when present in the influent) were completely reduced; measured SO4(2-) reduction decreased from 78 ± 4% in Stage 2 to 59 ± 4% in Stage 3, when NO3(-) was present. While perchlorate-reducing bacteria (PRB), assayed by qPCR targeting the pcrA gene, remained stable throughout, sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), assayed by the dsrA gene, increased almost 3 orders of magnitude when significant SO4(2-) reduction occurred in stage 2. The abundance of denitrifying bacteria (DB), assayed by the nirK and nirS genes, increased in Stage 3, while SRB remained at high numbers, but did not increase. Based on pyrosequencing analyses, β-Proteobacteria dominated in Stage 1, but ε-Proteobacteria became more important in Stages 2 and 3, when the input of multiple electron acceptors favored genera with broader electron-accepting capabilities. Sulfuricurvum (a sulfur oxidizer and NO3(-) reducer) and Desulfovibrio (a SO4(2-) reducer) become dominant in Stage 3, suggesting redox cycling of sulfur in the biofilm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23721373     DOI: 10.1021/es401310j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Biological perchlorate reduction: which electron donor we can choose?

Authors:  Li He; Yu Zhong; Fubing Yao; Fei Chen; Ting Xie; Bo Wu; Kunjie Hou; Dongbo Wang; Xiaoming Li; Qi Yang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The effect of electron competition on chromate reduction using methane as electron donor.

Authors:  Pan-Long Lv; Liang Zhong; Qiu-Yi Dong; Shi-Lei Yang; Wei-Wei Shen; Quan-Song Zhu; Chun-Yu Lai; An-Cheng Luo; Youneng Tang; He-Ping Zhao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Elevated nitrate enriches microbial functional genes for potential bioremediation of complexly contaminated sediments.

Authors:  Meiying Xu; Qin Zhang; Chunyu Xia; Yuming Zhong; Guoping Sun; Jun Guo; Tong Yuan; Jizhong Zhou; Zhili He
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  Spatial Variability of PAHs and Microbial Community Structure in Surrounding Surficial Soil of Coal-Fired Power Plants in Xuzhou, China.

Authors:  Jing Ma; Wangyuan Zhang; Yi Chen; Shaoliang Zhang; Qiyan Feng; Huping Hou; Fu Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  High-Rate Sulfate Removal Coupled to Elemental Sulfur Production in Mining Process Waters Based on Membrane-Biofilm Technology.

Authors:  Alex Schwarz; María Gaete; Iván Nancucheo; Denys Villa-Gomez; Marcelo Aybar; Daniel Sbárbaro
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-07

Review 6.  Hydrogenotrophic Microbial Reduction of Oxyanions With the Membrane Biofilm Reactor.

Authors:  Chen Zhou; Aura Ontiveros-Valencia; Robert Nerenberg; Youneng Tang; David Friese; Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown; Bruce E Rittmann
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.