Literature DB >> 23720523

To breed or not to breed: endocrine response to mercury contamination by an Arctic seabird.

Sabrina Tartu1, Aurélie Goutte, Paco Bustamante, Frédéric Angelier, Børge Moe, Céline Clément-Chastel, Claus Bech, Geir Wing Gabrielsen, Jan Ove Bustnes, Olivier Chastel.   

Abstract

Mercury, a ubiquitous toxic element, is known to alter expression of sex steroids and to impair reproduction across vertebrates but the mechanisms underlying these effects are not clearly identified. We examined whether contamination by mercury predicts the probability to skip reproduction in black-legged kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) from Svalbard. We also manipulated the endocrine system to investigate the mechanism underlying this relationship. During the pre-laying period, we injected exogenous GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) to test the ability of the pituitary to release luteinizing hormone (LH, a key hormone for the release of sex steroids and hence breeding) in relation to mercury burden. Birds that skipped reproduction had significantly higher mercury concentration in blood than breeders. Endocrine profiles of these birds also varied based on breeding status (breeders versus non-breeders), mercury contamination and sex. Specifically, in skippers (birds that did not breed), baseline LH decreased with increasing mercury concentration in males, whereas it increased in females. GnRH-induced LH levels increased with increasing mercury concentration in both sexes. These results suggest that mercury contamination may disrupt GnRH input to the pituitary. Thus, high mercury concentration could affect the ability of long-lived birds to modulate their reproductive effort (skipping or breeding) according to ongoing environmental changes in the Arctic, thereby impacting population dynamics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GnRH challenge; black-legged kittiwake; intermittent breeding; luteinizing hormone; mercury

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23720523      PMCID: PMC3730643          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  16 in total

Review 1.  Tracking contaminants in seabirds of Arctic Canada: temporal and spatial insights.

Authors:  Mark L Mallory; Birgit M Braune
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Total and organic Hg concentrations in cephalopods from the North Eastern Atlantic waters: influence of geographical origin and feeding ecology.

Authors:  P Bustamante; V Lahaye; C Durnez; C Churlaud; F Caurant
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Luteinizing hormone provides a causal mechanism for mercury associated disease.

Authors:  Dan R Laks
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 1.538

4.  Effects of dietary methylmercury on reproduction of fathead minnows.

Authors:  Chad R Hammerschmidt; Mark B Sandheinrich; James G Wiener; Ronald G Rada
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Estradiol reduces cumulative mercury and associated disturbances in the hypothalamus-pituitary axis of ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Fabíola Raquel Tenório Oliveira; Josione Rêgo Ferreira; Carlos Maurício Corrêa dos Santos; Lano Ermenson Miranda Macêdo; Ricardo Bezerra de Oliveira; José Antunes Rodrigues; José Luiz Martins do Nascimento; Lílian Rosana Ferreira Faro; Domingos Luiz Wanderley Picanço Diniz
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.291

Review 6.  The endocrine effects of mercury in humans and wildlife.

Authors:  Shirlee W Tan; Jesse C Meiller; Kathryn R Mahaffey
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.635

7.  Biomagnification of mercury in selected species from an Arctic marine food web in Svalbard.

Authors:  Iris Jaeger; Haakon Hop; Geir W Gabrielsen
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 8.  Mercury-induced reproductive impairment in fish.

Authors:  Kate L Crump; Vance L Trudeau
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.742

9.  Adverse effects from environmental mercury loads on breeding common loons.

Authors:  David C Evers; Lucas J Savoy; Christopher R DeSorbo; David E Yates; William Hanson; Kate M Taylor; Lori S Siegel; John H Cooley; Michael S Bank; Andrew Major; Kenneth Munney; Barry F Mower; Harry S Vogel; Nina Schoch; Mark Pokras; Morgan W Goodale; Jeff Fair
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 10.  Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and climate change: A worst-case combination for arctic marine mammals and seabirds?

Authors:  Bjørn Munro Jenssen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  11 in total

1.  Demographic consequences of heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants in a vulnerable long-lived bird, the wandering albatross.

Authors:  Aurélie Goutte; Christophe Barbraud; Alizée Meillère; Alice Carravieri; Paco Bustamante; Pierre Labadie; Hélène Budzinski; Karine Delord; Yves Cherel; Henri Weimerskirch; Olivier Chastel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Avian mercury exposure and toxicological risk across western North America: A synthesis.

Authors:  Joshua T Ackerman; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Mark P Herzog; C Alex Hartman; Sarah H Peterson; David C Evers; Allyson K Jackson; John E Elliott; Stacy S Vander Pol; Colleen E Bryan
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-17       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Oxidative stress in relation to reproduction, contaminants, gender and age in a long-lived seabird.

Authors:  David Costantini; Alizée Meillère; Alice Carravieri; Vincent Lecomte; Gabriele Sorci; Bruno Faivre; Henri Weimerskirch; Paco Bustamante; Pierre Labadie; Hélène Budzinski; Olivier Chastel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Mercury alters initiation and construction of nests by zebra finches, but not incubation or provisioning behaviors.

Authors:  Stephanie Y Chin; William A Hopkins; Daniel A Cristol
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Biomonitoring of heavy metals (Cd, Hg, and Pb) and metalloid (As) with the Portuguese common buzzard (Buteo buteo).

Authors:  Manuela Carneiro; Bruno Colaço; Ricardo Brandão; Carla Ferreira; Nuno Santos; Vanessa Soeiro; Aura Colaço; Maria João Pires; Paula A Oliveira; Santiago Lavín
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 6.  Climate change impacts on environmental and human exposure to mercury in the arctic.

Authors:  Kyrre Sundseth; Jozef M Pacyna; Anna Banel; Elisabeth G Pacyna; Arja Rautio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Blood inorganic mercury is directly associated with glucose levels in the human population and may be linked to processed food intake.

Authors:  Renee Dufault; Zara Berg; Raquel Crider; Roseanne Schnoll; Larry Wetsit; Wayne Two Bulls; Steven G Gilbert; H M Skip Kingston; Mesay Mulugeta Wolle; G M Mizanur Rahman; Dan R Laks
Journal:  Integr Mol Med       Date:  2015

8.  Age-related mercury contamination and relationship with luteinizing hormone in a long-lived Antarctic bird.

Authors:  Sabrina Tartu; Paco Bustamante; Aurélie Goutte; Yves Cherel; Henri Weimerskirch; Jan Ove Bustnes; Olivier Chastel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Modulators of mercury risk to wildlife and humans in the context of rapid global change.

Authors:  Collin A Eagles-Smith; Ellen K Silbergeld; Niladri Basu; Paco Bustamante; Fernando Diaz-Barriga; William A Hopkins; Karen A Kidd; Jennifer F Nyland
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

10.  Arctic climate change and pollution impact little auk foraging and fitness across a decade.

Authors:  Françoise Amélineau; David Grémillet; Ann M A Harding; Wojciech Walkusz; Rémi Choquet; Jérôme Fort
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.